My weekend trip to Karachi coincided with 3 incidents involving the Pakistan cricket team.
While I was on my way to the airport on Thursday, I got a call from a friend telling me that charges against Mohammad Asif had been dropped and he would be flying back to Pakistan soon.
While at the airport, I got an sms saying that Kamran Akmal had been dropped from Pakistan's list of probables for the Asia Cup.
When I landed in Karachi, I found out that Pakistan's 20 probables for the Asia Cup had also landed there earlier for a 3-day training camp.
All items are news worthy, but I'll start with the intrigue surrounding Mohammad Asif.
Since the release contradictory statements have been flying around from the different parties that were involved with the case.
Gulf News, UAE's leading daily newspaper, was one of the firsts to release the story on
Asif's release, and the Public Prosecutor who handled the case had this to say:
"The case has been dropped against Mohammad Asif due to insignificance ...
he will be deported as soon as the police finalise the procedures. It is
definite that he committed the crime of smuggling and possessing 0.24 grams of
opium as he was caught red-handed ... however at certain cases and for a faster
litigation process the Public Prosecution drops a case due to insignificance and
deports the suspect."
What exactly is insignificance? Any lawyers out there who can explain this.
It definitely does not imply towards an an insignficant quantity of the drug as I know that people carrying 0.1g of the substance have been sentenced to 4 years in the past.
Asif was sent back to Pakistan on Friday and on arriving in Lahore
he said:
“I have never used any wrong substance or drugs and that is why all my tests
taken by the Dubai authorities were negative... a small quantity of a herbal
medicine was in my wallet about which I was ignorant. I did not use that
medicine”
What bothers me is that he continues to call it herbal medicine when the prosecutors in Dubai have tested the substance and claimed that it was in fact opium.
This is the Chief Prosecutor's
statement:
"Dubai Police's forensic laboratory results have confirmed that the
contraband substance that was discovered in Asif's wallet is opium. The suspect
faced charges of smuggling and possessing drugs."
So I guess the hakeem gave Asif some opium, which Asif thought was herbal medicine.
The question here is that, why did Asif require some herbal medicine? PCB Chairman, Dr. Nasim Ashraf
answers that question:
“I met Asif today and he told me that the authorities found a small
substance from his wallet, which his herbal expert (hakeem) gave to him as a
pain-killer,”
Now now, a pain killer then.
If I understand WADA's regulations correctly then opium is banned substance because it helps relieve muscle pain, which helps in increasing stamina.
A pain killer relieves muscle pain.
So can the WADA ban Asif now for carrying a banned drug?
If news reports are to be believed then Asif was tested thrice during the Indian Premier League and his tests turned out negative. His tests turned out to be negative again when he was tested in Dubai.
So he can't be banned for consuming a banned substance.
However, there is a WADA regulation that states that smuggling banned drugs is an offence.
That is exactly what Asif did. But he didn't get charged. Can he still be banned given that he did actually smuggle the drug?
The other contradictory statement was regarding Asif's deportation from the UAE.
The Public Prosecutor's statement above clearly states that Asif was deported from Dubai. Deporation means that Asif will never be allowed to enter the UAE again.
All those who get deported get their finger prints and eye-scans taken by the police and airport authorities who make sure that they don't enter the country ever again.
Asif also provided his
finger prints and eye-scans.
The report clearly spells out that Asif was deported and can never enter the UAE without special permission from the interior minister.
Over in the Pakistan newspapers,
DAWN and
The Nation, Nasim Ashraf has been claiming:
"Asif was neither charged by the Dubai authorities nor he was deported.
Instead he was repatriated"
Repatriated means that Asif is not banned from entering the UAE, even though the UAE's newspapers are claiming otherwise.
Whose right?
Knowing what happens to the drug related offenders, I'm quite sure that Asif was deported. Thats what happens to all of them whether they go through the 4 years imprisonment or not.
So why is Nasim Ashraf claiming otherwise? To get a clean slate from WADA?
What next then?
Another one of the PCB's ever famous 3-man committees has been formed and they will grill Asif and prepare a report, which will be submitted to the ICC.
A
2-week timeframe has been given for the report to be completed.
Another report has Nasim Ashraf claiming that Asif would be asked to pay the legal expenses incurred during the case.
Having full faith, or rather a lack of, I can safely say that Asif would be given a free slate with a fine amounting to how much was spent on legal fees, and he would be playing for Pakistan in the next few months.
The PCB will also find a way to keep WADA away from all of this.
Labels: Drugs, ICC, Mohammad Asif, Nasim Ashraf, PCB, Q, WADA