Thursday, December 26, 2013

Record Breaking Series for Shehzad, Hafeez, and Pakistan!

Pakistan sealed their second successive ODI series win after defeating Sri Lanka comprehensively by 8 wickets in the 4th ODI.

It was Sri Lanka's tormentor-in-chief, the one and only, Pakistan's professor Mohammad Hafeez who once again notched up an unbeaten century, his third of the series, to take Pakistan to a comfortable victory with over 8 overs to spare.

A Pakistan innings without Misbah walking out to the middle has been a rarity for a long time considering the number of times he has had to save Pakistan from a collapse. Last night, it happened for the second time in 4 ODIs thanks to the tremendous form that Mohammad Hafeez and Ahmed Shehzad have been in.

Hafeez' has had a rollicking year in ODIs during which he has knocked 5 centuries, more than what he managed in his previous 9 years of international cricket (ODIs only).

The Pakistanis have established many interesting feats during this series that they have dominated.

1. Misbah overtook Virat Kohli as the leading run scorer in ODIs this year. His tally of 1,322 runs is well ahead of Kohli and with 1 ODI to go against Sri Lanka he can gain a significant lead and end the year as highest run scorer in ODIs.

2. The only man who can overtake Misbah is his Vice Captain, Hafeez, whose third century in four ODIs has taken his tally for the year to 1,260 runs.

3. Hafeez became only the 6th batsman overall and 2nd Pakistani batsman to score 3 centuries in a bilateral ODI series. He has scores of 122, 140*, and 113* in this series.

4. Hafeez has hit 5 centuries in ODIs this year, which is the most ODI centuries hit in 2013. Shikhar Dhawan also has 5. Hafeez has 1 more innings left and is in with a chance to break several more records.

5. Ahmed Shehzad scored his 4th ODI century in the 2nd ODI of the series against Sri Lanka. At 22 years and 26 days, Shehzad became the youngest Pakistani batsman to hit 4 ODI centuries, beating Salman Butt's record of reaching the feat at the age of 23 years and 35 days.

6. Ahmed Shehzad also became the fastest Pakistani batsman to hit 4 ODI centuries when he got there in only his 37th ODI innings, beating Saeed Anwar's record who hit his 4th ODI century in his 38th innings.

7. Both Ahmed Shehzad and Mohammad Hafeez started this series with their career batting averages below 30. Now they average 33.39 and 30.95 respectively.

8. When Pakistan won the 3rd ODI of the series against Sri Lanka, it was their 78th ODI win at the Sharjah Cricket Stadium. They equalled the record for most victories on a single ground, which is held by Australia with 78 wins at the Sydney Cricket Ground.

Interestingly, both Pakistan and Australia have a W:L ratio of 2.10 at the respective cricket grounds.

Pakistan's record reads: P 116, W 78, L 37, T 1; While Australia's reads P 120, W 78, L 37, NR 5!

Let's wait for Friday and see what more Shehzad, Hafeez, and Pakistan can achieve.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Sunday, December 22, 2013

Junaid Khan - One of the Best Fast Bowlers in the World!

In the summer of 2009, Pakistan unleashed a teenage left arm fast bowler on the international stage who took the world by storm. By the end of the summer of 2010, with his international career barely a year old, Pakistan's teen sensation had shocked the world with the disgrace he brought to his country.

Mohammad Amir's career stocks fell just as fast as they had risen.

It has been more than three years since Amir played for Pakistan, yet hardly a match goes by without the fans missing his presence in the Pakistan XI. Till date majority of the Pakistan fans miss him, would like to see him play for Pakistan again, and are eagerly anticipating his return in two years, if not sooner.

Amir has created such a euphoria with his spellbinding performances that his aura continues to remind fans of what could have been.

This euphoria is also the reason why the rise of another left arm fast bowler from Pakistan, who came on to the international scene about a year after Amir left it, has gone unnoticed.

Junaid Khan has now been playing for Pakistan for over two years, and he is by far the best fast bowler to play for them for a long time. He has been spearheading Pakistan's pace attack for a while now and some of the performances that he has given, especially in ODIs, deserve special praise.

Something that I feel he has not been given enough of.

Junaid Khan is an inspiration for up and coming young pacers. He is not only the best fast bowler in Pakistan, but arguably one of the best in the world currently.

Junaid's performance in the second ODI against Sri Lanka in Dubai left me awestruck. He bowled with intensity, with the firepower once associated with the two Ws, and single handedly brought Pakistan back into the game.

The performance also got me wondering just how good is Junaid Khan.

A comparison with Mohammad Amir shows that Junaid has been just as good, if not better, than the disgraced teen sensation, and yet he has not been applauded the same way that Amir was.


Junaid has definitely been superior in ODIs for Pakistan. One can only wonder how it would have been if these two left armers were currently spearheading Pakistan's attack.

A comparison with Pakistan's greatest fast bowlers, including the two Ws, Shoaib Akhtar, and Imran Khan, shows just how well Junaid Khan's career has progressed in ODIs.



Only Waqar Younis took more wickets than Junaid has in 39 ODIs; only 4 more wickets. And only Waqar Younis had a better strike rate than Junaid has after 39 ODIs; only 2 fewer deliveries required to pick up a wicket.

Junaid's relatively higher average and economy rate can be attributed to the playing conditions these days, which are far more conducive to high scores than in previous times.

Based on just this, Junaid is surely one of the best fast bowlers to emerge from Pakistan. He is only 23, and if he can sustain this form and fitness then he will have a long career, which will place him among the very best produced by Pakistan.

To put this into perspective at the global level, Junaid Khan's ODI bowling average of 22.93 is only bettered by Saeed Ajmal (22.87) and Ajantha Mendis (20.82) among the current ODI players with over 50 wickets.

There is no pacer in the world among the current players who has a better average than Junaid Khan.

Those players include Dale Steyn (25.49), Steven Finn (27.74), James Andersen (29.11), Lonwabo Tsotsobe (24.96), Morne Morkel (23.54), and Mitchell Johnson (25.37) - the fast bowlers part of the ICC rankings' Top 10 ODI bowlers.

Does this not make Junaid Khan one of the best fast bowlers in the world right now?

If you still need convincing, hear this...

Junaid Khan's strike rate of 27.6 in ODIs is the second best strike rate in ODIs ever (only Shaun Tait's 27.2 is better) for all bowlers who have taken a minimum of 50 ODI wickets.

While Amir might have taken the world of fast bowling by storm, it is Junaid who is slowly but surely making it his own!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, December 12, 2013

Shahid Afridi - What a Superstar!

Shahid Afridi did not bat like Shahid Afridi today.

He has played a number of good knocks in ODIs and T20s, but the calmness he showed at the crease today in the first T20 between Pakistan and Sri Lanka has been rare in majority of Afridi's innings.

The Afridi who came out to bat today was the Afridi of 2009 who led Pakistan to World T20 glory in England. The same responsibility was seen in his presence at the crease against Sri Lanka.

He picked up singles, punished the bad deliveries, and took Pakistan home with ease.

During the course of his unbeaten match winning 39, Afridi took his tally of T20 runs past 1,000 runs. He became the first cricketer to score 1,000 runs and pick up 50 wickets in T20 Internationals.

That is another feather in a cap that surely has no place for more feathers with the number of records Afridi holds in limited overs cricket.

Afridi's match winning performance, which included an unbeaten knock of 39 and figures of 1-20 of 4 overs, got him his 9th man of the match award in T20s, which is now the most MOM awards for any cricketer in T20 Internationals.

He went past both Shane Watson and Mohammad Hafeez with whom he was level on 8 MOM awards.

Don't forget that Afridi also holds the record for most man of the match awards by any Pakistani cricketer in ODIs with 31 MOM awards, which is also the 5th most MOM awards among all cricketers.

Not to mention that Afridi is the only cricketer to score more than 7,000 runs and pick up more than 350 wickets in ODIs.

What a player! What a hero! What a superstar! What a match winner!

Boom Boom Afridi!



Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, December 4, 2013

What could have been for Pakistan...


Kevin Pietersen recently played the 100th test of his career. It took him 8 years and 4 months to reach the 100 test landmark, just a month short of the record held by Andrew Strauss, who reached the landmark in only 8 years and 3 months.

The current England captain, Alastair Cook, will play his 100th Test at Perth, which will be the third test of the ongoing Ashes series. Cook will surpass his former captains and become the only man in the world to reach the landmark in less than 8 years. It would have taken Cook 7 years and 9 months to play 100 tests.

Those figures suggest that these English players play 12-13 test matches in a year.

Michael Clarke will also play his 100th test at Perth, making it a unique scenario where both captains of the opposing teams would be playing their 100th test. Clarke will reach the landmark in 9 years and 2 months, implying that he's played approximately 11 tests a year.

Pietersen, Clarke, Cook are considered as the leading test batsmen of this era, along with the likes of Hashim Amla, AB De Villiers, and Kumar Sangakkara.

When I say this era, it is the one after the era of Sachin Tendulkar, Ricky Ponting, Brian Lara, and Jacques Kallis, whose careers are over (or about to be in the case of Kallis).

I wonder though how much the English and Australian batsmen have benefited from playing a large amount of test cricket.

11-13 tests a year is a lot of test cricket.

Ricky Ponting played less than 10 tests a year during the course of his 17 year career. In comparison Sachin Tendulkar played only 8 tests a year. Brian Lara also played 8 tests a year, while Kallis plays an average of 9 per year.

The worst possible case however, is that of Younis Khan, who made his debut in 2000 - 13 years and 7 months ago - and has till date played only 86 tests, i.e. less than 7 tests a year.

That is due to a combination of the low number of tests that Pakistan plays, team politics, and Younis Khan's own erratic behaviour.

Whatever the reasons, one must wonder where Younis Khan would have been today had he played as much test cricket as Cook, Clarke, and Pietersen.


A comparison of all the above mentioned batsmen after 86 test matches, the amount that Younis has played till date, shows that only Lara and Sangakkara scored more runs; only Sachin, Ponting, Kallis, Sangakkara, and Clarke (marginally) averaged higher; only Sachin and Cook scored more centuries; and only Clarke and Lara have a higher personal score.

Can you imagine how many runs Younis would have scored had he played as much as Sachin, Ponting, and Kallis?

The three players have played double the amount of tests than Younis had. Sure they have had longer careers, but in Kallis' and Ponting's case, only 4-5 years longer. Even if Younis plays for another 4-5 years he would not get to 160 odd test matches.

Hell it would take him another 2 years to get to a 100 tests!

Younis Khan reached 7,000 test runs in 147 test innings. Faster than Pietersen, Clarke, and Cook got there; and only 1 innings later than Lara, and 2 later than Ponting.

The likes of Sachin, Sangakkara, Dravid, and even Sehwag and his country man Mohammad Yousuf got there significantly faster (7-10 innings lesser) but it tells you where Younis Khan stands.

Above the current batting greats, and at par with the all the modern day batting greats.

No Pakistani test batsman has scored 10,000 test runs.

The fastest batsmen to reach 10,000 test runs are Sachin, Lara, and Sangakkara, who got there in 195 test innings. Ponting took 196, Dravid 206, while the comparatively slower to that landmark include Steve Waugh who took 244 innings and Chanderpaul who took 239.

Javed Miandad, Pakistan's leading test scorer, did not even bat in 190 test innings in his career. Inzamam batted in 200.

There is no doubt that Pakistan's players suffer due to a lack of test cricket. Not only from creating records, but also from gaining more experience in the format. It is no secret that the more you play they better you become. How will our batsmen ever learn if they don't play enough?

Younis Khan is not the only batsman from Pakistan whose career can be tagged as "what might have been"; Mohammad Yousuf is also in a similar position.


Again it is a combination of Pakistan's test schedule, team politics, and Yousuf's own doing that he didn't play more or longer for Pakistan.

That record after 86 tests shows that Yousuf was well ahead of the pack of all batting greats. Only Sangakkara and Lara scored more runs in that many tests, and only Sachin scored more test centuries.

Yousuf's career ended after only 90 tests played over a period of 12 years and 6 months. That included a year of no test cricket for Pakistan, right after the year when Yousuf had surpassed Sir Viv Richards' record of the most test runs scored in a calendar year.

Pakistani batsmen are not the only ones who have been impacted by the low number of tests played by them; the bowlers have too.

Saeed Ajmal started his test career very late. He played his first test 4 years ago, a few months before his 32nd birthday. Since then he has played only 30 tests; only 7 tests a year.

He would have played another 20 in this time if he were from Australia or England.


Comparing Ajmal to other leading spinners in test cricket after 30 years shows that no other spinner even got close to the number of wickets Ajmal has taken; only Swann had a better strike rate; only Warne and Kumble had a better average; and no one picked up as many 10 wicket match hauls.

Can you imagine where Ajmal would have been had he played as much as Swann? Or where he would have ended if he played as many tests as Warne, Kumble, and Murali?

I can understand that some teams, including Pakistan, don't get their fair share of test cricket according to the FTP that is drawn up by the ICC every few years. They haven't played a 5 test series since 1992!

I also know that financial constraints make PCB schedule more ODIs on tours than test matches.

But are these reasons good enough to deny promising players from being considered as world's greatest?

They surely could have been.

It is a mixture of reasons why the likes of Ajmal, Younis, and Yousuf have not played as much test cricket as they ideally should have, but the foremost reason is the bad management controlling the PCB.

Till the board is sorted out and stronger leaders start to represent Pakistan on the global stage (for cricket and other things), players will continue to be impacted adversely.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Thursday, November 28, 2013

Pakistanis win Hearts all over again!

"In other words, submission. Because, finally, what Pakistan are doing in these moments is asking you to submit. They are asking you, opponent and spectator, to submit to their reality, their chaos, their unplanning, their spur of the moment, their pox, their talent, their wretchedness, their beauty, their spirit." - Osman Samiuddin

Last night's second one day international between Pakistan and South Africa was an unbelievable game of cricket.

It was a game that reminded the Pakistani fans of their wins in the 90s when Wasim and Waqar would bring the team back from no where.

It was a game that reminded the Pakistani fans to believe again.

It was a game that made the Pakistani fans fall in love with their cricketers again.

To beat South Africa in South Africa in any form of the game is an achievement. To beat them in a series is a bigger achievement. And then to think that you have become the first ever team from the subcontinent to win a series in South Africa, is just overwhelming!

That is an achievement and a half for this Pakistan team, which not very long ago was being thrashed by South Africa in ODIs and T20s.

It has been an amazing comeback for the Boys in Green!

Everything worked yesterday for Pakistan.

A century partnership between Ahmed Shehzad and Sohaib Maqsood at a run rate of almost 6 per over provided them with a platform to fire from. Umar Akmal and Bilawal Bhatti, who very soon will move above Afridi in the batting order, finished the innings perfectly.

262 in 45 overs was a daunting target. It was going to be difficult for South Africa, especially considering that they were up against an in form bowling unit.

Junaid Khan gave Pakistan the perfect start, removing Smith early and keep the run rate in check. Even though Amla and De Kock kept it together for South Africa, their scoring rate of 4-4.5 an over never threatened Pakistan.

When Afridi came on to bowl, Amla and De Kock were well settled but the required run rate was steadily creeping towards 7 an over. Afridi, who has been superb with the ball against South Africa, applied more pressure and accounted for De Kock and Kallis in quick succession.

119-3 in 26. 144 required in 19 overs at 7.58. Game Over?

It looked like it, but AB De Villiers had different things in mind.

ABD went about his job and made the chase look like a cake walk.

The only time South Africa looked like they were in the hunt was when ABD was out there in the middle.

He smashed the bowling around, toyed with Pakistan's premier spinner, hit out against Pakistan's most economical bowler, and looked to take the game away from the Greens.

During the course of his innings, ABD brought down the run rate from over 7.5 to below 5.5.

It was a crushing match winning knock by the South African captain. But only just.

When ABD fell to a good catch by Afridi on the boundary, South Africa were left with only 36 runs to get from 38 deliveries with 6 wickets in hand. Amla was batting on 86 and JP Duminy was walking out to the crease.

It should have been like a walk in the park for South Africa. And it seemed it would be as Amla and Duminy went about their business with ease.

The match seemed lost for Pakistan.

35 from 36, 31 from 30, 26 from 24, 20 from 18, 11 from 12.

Just when it looked like it was game over for Pakistan, Saeed Ajmal delivered a counter punch like no other in the penultimate over of the match.

Amla and Duminy managed only two singles off the first 3 deliveries, and then Ajmal bowled two dot balls.

9 needed from 7. Pressure on South Africa. Ajmal had bowled beautifully.

Off Ajmal's final delivery, Amla went for the big one towards mid wicket. The ball was in the air and two Pakistani fielders were charging towards it. Misbah looked anxiously as Hafeez positioned himself to take the catch, which he held on to. It was a difficult one, but Hafeez remained calm and sent Amla back for a well made 98.

9 needed from the final over of the match.

Junaid Khan had the ball. David Miller was on strike. Duminy at the other end.

Now, it was any body's game.

Miller managed a single of the first delivery and then Duminy heaved the second ball towards mid wicket in the hope of getting a big one early in the over.

Umar Amin ran towards the ball and dived to take a catch inches from the ground. It was a superb effort to catch that in a pressure situation. I know the scorecard says Anwar Ali, even the commentators said Anwar Ali, but it was Umar Amin who caught that ball to send Duminy back.

8 from 4. Pakistan were truly and surely back in it.

Junaid Khan bowled a beautiful final over. His yorkers were spot on and he gave the batsmen no space at all. Reminded me of Wasim bhai. The Pakistani fielders were prowling the boundaries and the square like tigers. The catching was immaculate.

Junaid gave nothing away and Pakistan scraped home with a 1 run win!

A 1 run margin does justice to the sort of cricket that was played last night. But it doesn't do justice to the magical final over bowled by Junaid Khan. The final delivery went for 4 byes, which is why the end result was a 1 run victory.

The last two overs was what Osman Samiuddin has termed "The Haal of Pakistan". According to Osman, the Haal of Pakistan is described in the following words:

"In other words, submission. Because, finally, what Pakistan are doing in these moments is asking you to submit. They are asking you, opponent and spectator, to submit to their reality, their chaos, their unplanning, their spur of the moment, their pox, their talent, their wretchedness, their beauty, their spirit."

It was truly unbelievable. Pakistan pulled of an amazing win. One that should have been easier had it not been for some superlative batting by AB De Villiers.

In either case, it was a magical victory for Pakistan who became the first ever team from the subcontinent to win a series in South Africa.

Reliving the events from last night, and it still feels like pure magic.

Maza aa gaya Pakistaaaan!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, November 19, 2013

It is all Misbah's Fault!

Yesterday there was an interesting blog post on the Express Tribune. It was titled: 6 reasons why Misbah Ul Haq should not be blamed.

The author of the article, Mr. Noman Ansari, provides us with 6 anti-Misbah notions (or assumptions as he calls them), which are publicly held by the vast majority of Pakistan fans and then dismisses them.

The 6 "assumptions" are:

Assumption 1:  We have a team of lions
Assumption 2:  the rest of the team tries to bat like Misbah
Assumption 3: Misbah should bat at number three and lead from the front
Assumption 4: Pakistan needs Inzamamul Haq as the batting coach
Assumption 5: Saeed Ajmal would be a better captain than Misbah
Assumption 6: Misbah only makes runs for himself, and not the team

I find it really hard to agree with Mr. Ansari. Imran Aslam, one of our regular followers and an avid fan of Cricket and the Pakistan team also disagrees with Mr. Ansari's viewpoint.

I am going to take a look at each of these assumptions one by one. I will first provide with a gist of what Mr. Ansari wrote; then I will provide Imran Aslam's point of view, and then my own opinion.

1. We have a team of lions

Mr. Ansari: ...the Pakistani cricket team is certainly not packing lions. Our opening batsman is Mohammad Hafeez, who going by his scores is more of a duck than a lion. The other openers such as Nasir Jamshed and Ahmed Shehzad are promising, but still far from consistent. Sohaib Maqsood could be our next big thing, but needs grooming and apparently has a history of fitness issues. Meanwhile, our last next big thing, Umar Akmal, although supremely talented, bats like he had been dropped as a baby by his nurse. This could have been the same hospital where Shahid Afridi was born... we are less a team of lions, and more like a misfit zoo with old animals.

Imran Aslam: his first argument here is about Hafeez being a duck and not a lion - completely agreed. However, is it my fault that Hafeez continues to bat in the top 3 despite having proven very successfully that he is not capable of this or might Misbah have something to do with deciding the batting order? Then he talks about Shahzad and Jamshed - how come these 2 bat with a completely different intent in T20s? and then Afridi, again is it my fault that our team combination was such that Afridi was batting at 7 when everyone and their dog knows that he should not be batting above 8.

Q: If Hafeez is a duck then should Misbah not be blamed for keeping a duck in the team? Remember that the selectors finally put their foot down when they dropped Hafeez from the test squad for the series against South Africa, despite resistance from Misbah. Misbah has been instrumental in developing the clout that Hafeez now enjoys within the management and board. I am actually a Hafeez supporter; I think that through his bowling he commands a position in the limited overs teams. However, given his batting, he should be batting down the order. But again isn't Misbah to blame for maintaining Hafeez' position in the top order?

Dropping Nasir from the ODIs in SA, giving him a dressing down during the Champions Trophy, and playing with his confidence are all Misbah's fault. Ahmed Shehzad has been superb at the top of the order; please remember that Shehzad was kept away from the ODI side for the longest time by Misbah because he preferred the likes of Imran Farhat and did not want an Afridi supporter in the team. 

How can you let Misbah get away with his treatment of Umar Akmal? He first kicked him out of the domestic team that they both play for. Then he got him dumped from the ODI team, despite Umar being the highest ranked ODI batsman Pakistan had. Umar Akmal has been the best ODI batsman for Pakistan in the past 3-4 years, yet because of Misbah we find him batting at 6 or 7 and burdened with the wicket keeping duties.

Unbelievable.

Shahid Afridi should be kept away from batting discussions. But if we are talking about lions, then the team doesn't have a bigger one than Lala. What a player.

Mr. Ansari, field pe dekhen kaun shero ki tarah shikar dhoond raha hota hai. It ain't Misbah!

2. Rest of the team tries to bat like Misbah

Mr. Ansari: Recently, Mohammad Yousuf told a few jokes when criticising Misbah. The first was that our batsmen are following Misbah as a role-model, which is why they are unable to score runs and thus win matches. If anyone has seen Misbah at the crease, they know that he is patient, disciplined and tries to play a long innings. Clearly, this is the exact problem with Umar Akmal, Shahid Afridi, Nasir Jamshed, Mohammad Hafeez and rest of the batsmen. Obviously, they are trying too hard to emulate Misbah by occupying the crease. Why, just the other day I was screaming at Shahid Afridi and Umar Akmal for playing patiently like Misbah, rather than trying to irresponsibly hit the ball out of the park.

Imran Aslam: First of all Shahid Afridi is NOT a batsman and should not be considered in any argument which involves the word batsman. Look at Jamshed pre and post being dropped by Misbah; is there any difference in the way he plays and might that have something to do with the captain? Yes U Akmal does not try to bat like Misbah but he gets rewarded by being played below Sohail Tanvir and Afridi in the batting order!!!

Q: Misbah is not a role model. He cannot inspire his batsmen. Javed Miandad, Inzamam Ul Haq, and even MoYo to an extent were all inspirational and brought out the best in younger batsmen. Misbah cannot do the same.  

3. Misbah should bat at 3 and lead from the front

Mr. Ansari: This is another joke courtesy of Mohammad Yousuf, who says that our batsmen’s technique is poor is because Misbah doesn’t have the guts to come at the number three batting position. First of all, let’s think of all the times that Mohammad Yousuf as Pakistan captain came in at one down. Under his captaincy, Pakistan’s batting also struggled, and although the fans begged MoYo to come in at number three, he stuck to his favorite position in the middle order. So please, as great a batsman as you were Mr Yousuf, practice what you preach. Secondly, Misbah coming in at one down is only a stop gap solution and won’t improve any cricketer’s technique. Our batsmen have always had deep technical flaws that come from our terrible grassroots standards. How can one blame Misbah for that? 

Imran Aslam: If MoYo did not take on the responsibility and bat at no. 3 Misbah should not either? Brilliant logic indeed!!! Oh and btw, MoYo just captained Pakistan in a grand total of 8 ODI's with 4 of those instances coming in 2003-04 when he was deputizing for Inzi - so he effectively captained in 4 ODIs (against Australia) when the batting was struggling and he did not promote himself.

Q: This is typical of blaming the critic of not doing something instead of defending the person being criticized. So what if MoYo did not take the responsibility? The fact itself is untrue however. Mohammad Yousuf batted at number 3 in 45 innings in ODIs, compared to Misbah who has batted at that position only once!

4. Pakistan needs Inzamam Ul Haq as the batting coach

Mr. Ansari: I would say that Yousuf and Inzamam adversely affected Pakistan cricket by introducing a needless religious focus in the dressing room. Now, Yousuf is lobbying for Inzamam to become Pakistan’s new coach. While Inzamam was a great batsman, his technique wasn’t fabulous in testing conditions. One has to look at Inzamam’s World Cup record, where aside from 1992, he was a huge disappointment. Furthermore, Inzamam's record in Australia and South Africa, where the conditions really test a batsmen’s technique, was quite ordinary. In Australia he averaged a mediocre 30, while in South Africa, he scored at an average of 31 runs per Test match innings.

Imran Aslam: Inzi has been one of the very best batsmen produced by Pakistan (if not the best) and if our batsmen need a good batting coach and a local one Inzi is probably the best option out there. Yes he did not average very high in Aus and SA but batting conditions in England are equally hard (maybe tougher due to the swing and seam) and I remember Inzi producing some gems out there. As for his WC record - I remember Inzi doing well in the 96 WC and reasonably well in the 99 WC as well (his 81 against Australia being a treat to watch).

Q: Mr. Ansari has completely confused me here. In trying to defend Misbah, he has suddenly shifted focus to criticizing the best batsman ever produced by Pakistan. His technique was not fabulous? You gotta be kidding me! Not a good record in World Cups? Ha! He played an instrumental role in guiding Pakistan towards World Cup glory in 1992. He averaged 48 in the 1996 World Cup, and he was our second highest run scorer, behind Saeed Anwar, in the 1999 world cup.

If there is anyone who should be coaching Pakistan's batsmen it should be one of Hanif Mohammad, Javed Miandad, or Inzamam Ul Haq. But even they would not be able to change Misbah's mindset.

5. Saeed Ajmal would be a better captain than Misbah 

Mr. Ansari: both Yousuf and Akhtar are insisting that Ajmal would be a better captain than Misbah... the complaints Yousuf and Akhtar have about Misbah involve his batting. Well, newsflash, Ajmal can't actually bat. On the field, Misbah is a decent captain. His field settings are on the mark and he attacks new batsmen by blocking singles and employing close in fielders. He is certainly a better captain than Yousuf ever was. If the complaints about Misbah’s captaincy are about his approach to batting, why replace him with a bowler and at what cost? Will Ajmal continue to bowl as well under the pressure of captaincy? Will this appointment create rifts in the dressing room? Keep in mind, Misbah was the one who brought Ajmal into the team, so it would surely create friction in the dressing room.

Imran Aslam: Misbah being a better captain than MoYo does not make Misbah a good captain (again also remember MoYo was never a long term captain). The complaints against Misbah are for both his batting and his captaincy and these are 2 separate chains of complaints. Saying Saeed Ajmal can't replace Misbah as captain because Saeed Ajmal can't bat is probably the most ridiculous thing I have heard in a very long time. Regarding his field placings and attacking captaincy, I wonder what cricket this author has been watching because in the version I got to see there have been blatant mistakes in his captaincy, starting from team selection, going on to batting order, bowling changes and field placings. Promoting Sohail Tanvir in the middle of a crucial chase, not playing JK, not utilizing Hafeez enough as a bowler when the pacers are being taken to the cleaners are just a few recent examples.

Q: Whoever said that a bowler can't be a captain? Remember Courtney Walsh? Waqar Younis? Misbah the captain and misbah the batsman, both have flaws, but both problems are not interlinked. Speculation of what Ajmal's captaincy will result in are baseless. Why would it create a rift if Misbah and Ajmal are that close? Once again, attacking MoYo will not change the problems that are inherent in Misbah.

6. Misbah only makes runs for himself, not the team

Mr. Ansari: This is a theory that comes less from experts and more from some members of our public. Cricket is a team game and one cricketer can’t win a match alone. I remember when Sachin Tendulkar was India’s only good batsmen; he would score countless runs, but often end up on the losing side. Was this Sachin’s fault, or the fault of the rest of his team? Keep in mind that Misbah almost always comes to bat in a crisis, where he is forced to drop anchor. Does the Misbah propeller spin slowly because it is designed that way or because it has to carry the work load of 10 other propellers?

Let’s look at one of the few matches where Misbah did not come in under pressure. During the first Test match against South Africa, Misbah came in after a fantastic opening stand and scored an excellent century that was fairly aggressive by his standards.

Imran Aslam: First of all, lets not talk about test matches suddenly in the middle of an ODI related discussion because these are 2 very different games. Secondly, if Misbah does come in to bat in a crisis every single time, why does he not assess his top order and see the reasons behind him coming in a crisis? Having said that, I dug out some stats a couple of days back in response to some post and saw that from all the times Misbah has batted at no 5, he has come in to bat with less than 50 runs on the board only 25% of the time or so. 

Q: Why is the example one of a test match innings? Neither I, nor majority of the public, have an issue with Misbah the test captain or Misbah the test batsman. That is where he belongs and that is where he should stay. My sole issue is with his presence in the ODI team. He is not good for the ODI team.

To conclude, I would just like to ask Mr. Ansari and the public one question - over the past 3 years, our test performances and T20 performances have been very good. However, in ODIs, we have been quite pathetic. It is quite obvious to me that there are issues within the ODI team that are not prevalent in the Test or T20 setup. It is obvious to me that despite his batting form, Misbah, has not been able to bring out the best in his team in ODIs. Why isn't someone willing to do something about this?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


What We Love About the BBC's Ashes Test Match Special

At the time of writing, it is a little over 48 hours until the first ball is bowled in this classic sporting battle of two old foes. The Ashes has few parallels in modern sport in regards to its gruelling competitiveness and rivalry, but as with many contests, it is the quality of the coverage that its success relies on.

Test Match Special (otherwise known as TMS) has been providing ball-by-ball commentary of England cricket since 1957, and in that time it has developed a huge fan base (just shy of 50k Facebook likes currently), as well as a reputation as one of the finest sports broadcasts in the world.

But what is it about TMS that we find so compelling?

Wit and Humour

There's a lot of cricket to be played during one day of a test match, but even so, there is plenty of quiet moments which need to be filled. This is where the TMS team excel, delivering moments of great hilarity. Take this unintentional double entendre by TMS presenter Jonathon Agnew:

http://youtu.be/PtvYt28hD8I

Geoffrey Boycott's commentary can be especially entertaining, with his no nonsense and uncompromising Yorkshire personality leading to a Take-No-Prisoners approach to cricket analysis that is frankly some of the best around.

Expert Cricket Analysis

The banter of TMS is one of its unique selling points, but it still requires that expert analysis to paint a vivid picture of what is happening on the pitch. The TMS team are made up of former pro's that include some of the finest players to have graced the sport, all of whom can speak eloquently about even the most minor of details without losing the audience.



The commentary teams change around on a regular basis - perhaps every 20 minutes or so -  and yet retain the same impeccably high standards of analysis at all times. Talk about strength in depth.

As Relaxing as it is Enthralling

The final overs of an epic test may well have you on the edge of your seat, but for long periods of the match it can be quite sedate, but far from descending into boredom, TMS ensures that when the action isn't quite so intense you can sit back and relax as you enjoy pure audible ambrosia.

There is something especially comforting about listening to a broadcast from the sunshine of Australia on a cold British night, transporting you to the other side of the world and - in spirit at least - into the warmth of the Ashes down under.

What do you think it is about cricket commentary that sets it apart from analysis of any other sport? Let us know in the comments.

This guest blog was written by John Rooney

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Sunday, November 3, 2013

Shahid Afridi ... Tu Mera Hero!

It has been 17 years since Shahid Afridi made his ODI debut for Pakistan.

It has been 17 years since I have been an Afridi fan and vocal supporter. 

So much so that I have endlessly argued with the world about his value to the Pakistan ODI team on Well Pitched, Boys in Green, and on several other forums in the online world.

The first ODI against South Africa gave the Afridi critics another chance to blame the man who is a darling for the masses.

And blame him for what? For smashing a half tracker straight into the hands of deep mid wicket when Pakistan required only 7 runs to win.

Everyone forgot that Pakistan lost its last 6 wickets for 17 runs. Afridi was one of the six. There were 5 others and all of them got out to bad batting.

Magar gaaliyan to sirf Afridi ko hi deni hain na.

Everyone had also forgotten that Afridi, along with Saeed Ajmal, had been instrumental in restricting South Africa to 180 odd. A target that the Pakistan batsmen should have achieved.

Lekin nai. Gaaliyan to sirf Afridi ko hi deni hain na.

Well, nothing really shuts up the critics more than a match winning performance.

And Afridi produced just that in the 2nd ODI against South Africa in Dubai on Friday.

26 valuable runs. 3 crucial wickets. Man of the Match. Boom Boom!

Since his return to the national team, Afridi has played 10 ODIs against West Indies, Zimbabwe, and South Africa, for the following return:

17 wickets at an average of 18.23
194 runs at an average of 24.25
2 Man of the Match Awards

What else do you want?

Aur maangta kya hai Afridi se?

Is that not enough? 

It is a fact that Shahid Afridi is the largest Superstar in Pakistan right now. One of the most exhilarating experience of watching cricket in a stadium is to witness the roar that welcomes Shahid Afridi to the pitch.

It is deafening.

Every time Afridi walks out, har bache se leke buddhe tak ka dil karta hai Boom Boom.

Besides being the largest Superstar in Pakistan currently, Afridi is also Pakistan's biggest match winner in ODIs.

On Friday, it was his 31st Man of the Match Award.

Only 6 players have won more MOM awards, and no one has won more for Pakistan. Another 2 MOM awards and Afridi will have the third most MOM awards in the history of ODIs.

Sure he's played a lot of ODIs - 364 of them, but his 31 MOM awards means that Afridi wins a MOM award at the rate of 1 in every ~12 ODIs (11.7). That is exactly the same rate as Ricky Ponting! (32 MOM in 375 ODIs).

Only Saeed Anwar has a better rate of winning MOM awards for Pakistan than Afridi (among players with more than 15 MOM awards for Pakistan in ODIs).

I don't think Pakistan has seen a bigger match winner than Shahid Afridi in limited overs cricket.

He is only 35 wickets away from becoming only the 5th bowler in history to take 400 ODI wickets.

Superstar, match winner, top bowler, and as my friend Fatima says "tu mera hero" !

Aur kya chahye Pakistanio ko?



Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Friday, October 25, 2013

Monty still Important to England Hopes

Alastair Cook has admitted every member of the England squad must do their bit to keep Monty Panesar in high spirits during the Ashes after a tough year for the spinner.

While the popular bowler has found himself behind Graeme Swann in the pecking order over recent years, Panesar has still remained in and around the Test squad and could win his 50th cap during the tour of Australia this winter.

Panesar was named in England’s touring party for the upcoming Ashes series despite a number of disciplinary issues over the past six months.

Moreover, while Betfair pundits have suggested that the left-arm spinner will most likely be used as back-up to Graeme Swann over the next couple of months, Cook has made it clear Panesar could still play a crucial role for England during this tour.

Cook admitted he was aware that the 31-year-old might need special attention during the tour of Australia, where the English are looking to clinch the urn for a fourth successive time.

"We have got to make sure we look after him off the field. Sometimes you take a second spinner on tour and you know you might not play games. It can be very hard to carry the drinks at certain times.

"Clearly he had a tough summer, and probably tough year or so. We need to get Monty in the right frame of mind so if he's called upon,” said the captain ahead of his team’s departure for Australia.

While Panesar does not pose the Australian batsmen the same level of threat a fully fit Swann does now, fans who gamble with betfair know that Monty is still a very useful option to have during a long tour.


However, the tourists will need to make sure the bowler can get his focus on cricket now he’s in Australia after a turbulent summer in England.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Friday, October 18, 2013

Pakistan - The Giant Killers

It has been 12 hours since Pakistan defeated South Africa in the first test of the two match series in Abu Dhabi, and the feeling that what a great achievement the win is for Pakistan has started to sink in.

There could not have been a more stark contrast between the test record of the two teams coming into this match.

South Africa - undefeated in 15 tests prior to this one, ranked world number 1, and boasting the presence of the top two ranked test batsmen and the top two ranked test bowlers in their XI.

Pakistan - 1 test win in their last 8 tests that too against lowly ranked Zimbabwe, ranked number 6, and coming fresh of a test defeat to Zimbabwe.

South Africa were clear favourites. No one really gave Pakistan a chance.

Except for those quietly confident eternally optimistic fans who believed that the UAE always brings about special performances from Pakistan.

It was just last year, in the UAE, that Pakistan had clean swept the then world number 1 test team - England. However, since then Pakistan had been poor in tests. They had lost a series to Sri Lanka, were whitewashed in South Africa, and drew a series 1-1 in Zimbabwe.

Pakistan, who had risen to number 4 in the test rankings, had fallen to 6 this year.

The slide was unfathomable for the fans.

Yet for the quietly confident eternally optimistic fans, it was just a matter of time before those fortunes swung again.

Pakistan might have become poor travellers, but they are a super power at home. They have not lost a single test match in the UAE since it became "home" for them in 2010.

Even prior to that, Pakistan's home record was second to none. They have the best W:L ratio among all teams in test matches played at home.



Pakistan's record in the UAE prior to this match against South Africa was also enviable. Played 12, Won 6, Lost 2, Draw 4.

Despite the fact that South Africa were favourites going into the first test in Abu Dhabi, I am sure that there were others like me who thought that Pakistan could not be counted out.

Yet to achieve a victory like Pakistan did was a big achievement.

Forget the fact that Pakistan defeated the world number 1 test team. Think about the fact that Pakistan managed to bowl out a team, whose batting line up comprised of the names Hashim Amla, Jacques Kallis, Graeme Smith, AB De Villiers, JP Duminy, and Faf Du Plessis, not once but twice for less than 250 inside 4 days.

Those 6 names are synonymous with feats like chasing 414 to win a test match in Australia and batting out 148 overs to save a test match in Australia. Two of those names sit pretty at the top of the test batsmen rankings.

The fact Pakistan's 4 man attack bowled them out for 249 and 232 on a relatively good batting surface highlights the enormity of Pakistan's achievement.

Every bowler chipped in. Mohammad Irfan softened the batsmen upfront and got the initial breakthroughs; Junaid Khan troubled the batsmen with his swing and got the prized wicket of Kallis twice in the match; the debutant Zulfiqar Babar bowled rippers and asked questions of the batsmen in every over; and the magician Saeed Ajmal continued to cast a spell ending the match as the leading wicket taker among both teams.

Pakistan's bowling has delivered time and again in the past and it did so again. What made Pakistan count in this match was its batsmen, who stood up to be counted, and almost ensured that Pakistan would not have to bat again.

There are numerous examples of test matches in which Pakistan's batsmen have thrown away the advantage that their bowlers have created for them.

That did not happen this time round.

Besides the two centuries and a solid 75 by the debutant opener, the highlight of Pakistan's batting performance was the running between the wickets. There was assurance and confidence in the manner the Pakistan batsmen ran.

The strike was rotated constantly and there was hardly any time in their innings that one felt that the Pakistanis were embroiled in meaningless defence for prolonged periods.

That allowed them to score at over 3 an over (3.18 for the innings). There were even long periods of the game when Pakistan was scoring at over 4 an over. In contrast, South Africa's run rate in its two innings was 2.67 and 2.80.

Pakistan have a lot to be proud of after this win and there are many feats that they will treasure and take with them into the next test match in Dubai.

  1. Khurram Manzoor's 146 was the highest score by a Pakistan batsman in a test match against South Africa.
  2. Khurram Manzoor and Shan Masood's 135 run opening partnership was the second highest opening partnership for Pakistan against South Africa. They fell short by two runs of the record partnership, which was between Taufeeq Umar and Imran Farhat in 2003.
  3. The opener's century stand was Pakistan's first after 10 tests. The last century opening stand came 22 innings ago.
  4. Misbah, with scores of 100 and 28*, became the leading run scorer in all international matches played in 2013.
  5. Asad Shafiq scored his 7th test 50 while batting at number 6. That is now the highest number of test 50s for a number 6 batsman in tests in the past three years (since 1st November 2010). Angelo Matthews and Ian bell have 6 fifties each at number 6 during this period. Asad Shafiq also has 3 centuries at this position during this period; Only Michael Hussey with 5 centuries has more. Asad Shafiq needs 101 more runs to over take Hussey and become the leading run scorer at the number 6 position in tests since 1st November 2010.
  6. Misbah became the oldest man to score a test century for Pakistan.
  7. Dale Steyn's opening spell of 5-0-31-0 was his most expensive opening spell ever in test cricket.

UAE is fast becoming Pakistan's fortress, while Pakistan is fast gaining the reputation of being Giant Killers. This was their fourth consecutive win in the UAE against the number 1 test team.

Additionally, in the past two years they have managed to:

Beat England (World #1 Test Team) 3-0
Beat India (ODI World Champions) 2-1
Beat West Indies (World T20 Champions) 2-0

This win against South Africa is no surprise. Not for the quietly confident eternally optimistic fans. However, it is one big achievement and all Pakistani should be proud.

Especially Misbah and his men.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, October 17, 2013

Pakistan's 4th Consecutive win against the World's Number 1 Test Team, in the UAE



Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Friday, October 4, 2013

Why no Compton?

With the return fixture of the Ashes quickly approaching, all eyes were on the selectors when they announced the squad for the trip. The inclusion of Michael Carberry over Nick Compton certainly raised a few eyebrows among Betfair punters.

Before being usurped by Joe Root, Compton was trailed as England’s opening batsman. He played nine tests for England and managed to score 479 runs at an average of 31.93 runs an innings; during this time, he managed to hit two hundreds and one fifty.

Although not better than Root, Compton is a safe back up to have; he was named one of the five Wisden Cricketers of the year in 2013.

Michael Carberry played for England in the subsequent one day internationals after the conclusion of the Ashes but has only ever played one test for England. During the one-day internationals, Carberry did little of note to warrant selection over Compton. He hit a score of 63 in one match but did little else.

Many people who gamble with Betfair view Carberry as a one-day player and not a test-match cricketer.

Away from the international stage, the two are fairly similar at county level. Compton (Somerset) has a batting average of 43.94, while Carberry’s is 43.29. Carberry (Hampshire) has played more games at county level and has more hundreds than Compton: 28 to 20. Compton scored 1001 in this year’s County Championship while Carberry playing in the division below has managed only 687.


Why England have opted for Carberry over Compton remains a mystery. Compton has more experience on the international stage, plays at a higher level of cricket than Carberry, and is a better run scorer, as well as being a Wisden Cricketer of the year.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Tuesday, October 1, 2013

The Cricout iPhone App is Here!

Cricout has been in the making for some time now. This year has been big for the website, which provides users an integrated platform to follow live cricket in a social networking environment.

Since the website's launch earlier this year, Cricout has provided online followers of the game an alternative online source to follow live ball-by-ball commentary of cricket matches being played around the world.

The team at Cricout has worked hard to provide cricket fans with that something extra, which includes value additions like:

  • A social networking environment where you can interact and share news, pictures, and videos with your friends.
  • Cricket experts, who provide their expert views on live cricket matches, who you can follow.
  • Newsfeed that provides all the latest cricket news, posts by your friends, and posts by the cricket experts that you follow.

As the website continues to grow, Cricout has released its iPhone application, which is now available on app store. You can download the app from here.

Cricout is a whole new social experience of following cricket online, and the new iPhone app allows you to do that on the go!

It is your one stop destination for live ball-by-ball commentary, expert comments, social interaction with friends and cricket experts, and your daily dose of cricket news delivered in a personalized feed.

Cricout is the new age of live ball-by-ball commentary and a must use for all online followers of the game.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Wednesday, September 25, 2013

What's Wrong with Pakistan's Test Team?

I think rather than wondering how the hell Pakistan lost a test match to Zimbabwe, we should be praising Younis Khan for ensuring that Pakistan came out of the series with a 1-1 draw instead of a 2-0 loss, which was sure to happen had Younis not come out with a scintillating double hundred.

Losing to Zimbabwe in any form of the game is embarrassing for a top cricket nation. But losing to them in a test match is worse than that. The players should find it difficult to show their faces in public. They should find it difficult to speak to the media. They should be at a loss for words. They should feel humiliated.

The upcoming series against South Africa brings this Pakistan test team full circle since Misbah took over in 2010. Misbah's first series as test captain was against South Africa in the UAE in November 2010.

During his first 18 months as test captain, Pakistan did not lose a single test series. In fact in the 15 tests they played between November 2010 and February 2012, Pakistan lost only 1!

Under Misbah, Pakistan's test team had an enviable test record - Played 15, won 9, lost 1.

They won test series against England, Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Zimbabwe, and Bangladesh and drew them against South Africa and the West Indies.

The pinnacle of this period was the clean sweep over the number 1 ranked test nation - England, which helped Pakistan rise to number 4 in the test rankings. Their highest test ranking for a decade.

And then suddenly something went horribly wrong.

Since clean sweeping England, Pakistan have not won any test series. They lost 1-0 to Sri Lanka, were embarrassed 3-0 by South Africa, and humiliated in a 1-1 draw with Zimbabwe, which could have easily been a 2-0 loss.

In the 18 months since the win over England, Pakistan has played 8 tests under Misbah, winning only 1 of them, that too against Zimbabwe.

While Misbah's overall test record is still pretty good - Played 23, Won 10, Lost 6 - his W:L ratio has gone down from a record 9:1 to 5:3.

So what went wrong? When did Pakistan become such a bad test team? The same set of players clean swept England. The same set of players helped Pakistan reach number 4 in the test rankings. What has gone wrong?

Pakistan's Test XI against South Africa in 2010 was Hafeez, Taufeeq, Azhar, Younis, Misbah, Asad, Adnan, Rehman, Gul, Wahab, Ajmal.

Pakistan's Test XI against Zimbabwe in 2013 was Hafeez, Khurram, Azhar, Younis, Misbah, Asad, Adnan, Rehman, Ajmal, Junaid, Rahat

Besides an opener and two pacers, Pakistan's test team is exactly what it was three years ago.

In all the test series during the past three years, Pakistan has been consistent with its test team selections. There has been no chopping and changing.

Yet, a winning pattern has changed into a losing one.

Why?

If you take a look at the overall performance of the batsmen during the three years that Misbah has been in charge, it actually shows that they have been quite solid.


I do not think that Pakistan has ever had a top 6 that has been as consistent as this one. Pull out the batsmen averages for any 3 year period, I doubt that any 6 will have given a better cumulative performance over a sustained period.

The bowling has been spearheaded by the world's bets spinner, Saeed Ajmal; and his supporting cast been quite strong.


However, there is a stark contrast between the performance of the players in the first 18 months of Misbah's test captaincy and that in the next 18 months.

The dip in performance of the batsmen is significant.


While three of Pakistan's batsmen averaged above 50, with two averaging well above 60, between November 2010 and February 2012, none of them averaged above 50 during the period between March 2012 and September 2013.

There is a clear dip in form of Azhar Ali, who stood like a rock at number 3 during the first half of Misbah's captaincy tenure. While Younis Khan has continued to be a dominating force even in the latter period, there is a big difference from his superlative performance during the initial period. Much like Misbah.

There are two clear reasons for this drop in performance levels.

Out of the 15 tests in the initial period, Pakistan played 8 of them in the UAE, which even though is not home for the batsman, it is somewhat home and favorable batting conditions. Additionally, out of the 7 away tests in this period, 3 were in Bangladesh and Zimbabwe.

Over the next period, Pakistan played all of the 8 tests in testing foreign conditions of Sri Lanka, South Africa, and Zimbabwe.

Not playing at "home" has not helped Pakistan's test batsman and they have not been able to translate their super home surface success in foreign conditions.

The other reason is scheduling ofcourse.

While Pakistan played 15 tests in 16 months between November 2010 and February 2012, they played only 8 test over the next 19 months!

Cricket is a rhythm game; the more flow you are in and the better you play. There was a gap of 4 months between Pakistan's successful test series against England and their next test series against Sri Lanka.

Additionally, there was an elongated gap of 8 months between that series and their next test series against South Africa, earlier this year.

Then they waited another 6 months to play tests against Zimbabwe.

Such scheduling helps no one. You can blame the ICC or other cricket boards all you want for not giving Pakistan a good schedule as per the FTP, but the only one to hold accountable for this is the PCB.

I understand that Pakistan cricket is suffering because they can't host any team in their own country, but that does not mean that the administrators cannot lobby with other boards to arrange more tours. Especially when the board has witnessed a rise in the team's test performance.

Players like Azhar Ali, who only play test cricket, suffer even more as they are kept away from international cricket for long periods of time. Azhar has been a pillar for Pakistan in tests and a key component of their success in the earlier part of Misbah's captaincy tenure; however he failed miserably in the series against Zimbabwe.

Can you really blame him? He played no cricket at all besides some meaningless domestic ODI games between March and August of this year.

Only the PCB is to be blamed for that.

The fans will continue to cry and complain about Misbah's captaincy, Hafeez' non-performance as an opener, the lack of flair of Azhar Ali and Asad Shafiq.

But the truth of the matter is that Pakistan cricket is suffering the most because it is not playing enough. It is not touring enough.

Pakistan can't host cricket at home, which effects the amount of revenues the board can generate. That impacts the number of development tours that an Under-19 team or a Pakistan A team can make to gain experience of foreign conditions. A lack of international cricket at home means that players wait for long periods between tours making them lose their flow.

A greater reliance is put on ODIs to generate funds, which impacts the number of tests Pakistan plays. This has impacted players like Aamir Sohail and Mohammad Yousuf in the past, and now it is impacting the careers of batsmen like Azhar Ali and Taufeeq Umar.

Amir Sohail once hit 205 in a test against England at Old Trafford. The commentators likened him to the great Sir Viv Richards. After that series, Pakistan did not play a test for another 6 months.

Mohammad Yousuf hit the most runs in a calendar year in the history of test cricket in 2006. He played only 6 tests over the next 30 months!

So yes while a defeat against Zimbabwe is sad and embarrassing and humiliating, the players are really not at as much fault as it is being portrayed.

The board, the domestic structure, the international isolation of the country are big reasons for our downfall. The fact that we even manage to win in these times is an achievement.

Hopefully the upcoming tours at "home" in the UAE will bring some smiles back on the faces of Pakistan cricket fans.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Boyd 10/1 to be top Rankin bowler

BOYD RANKIN is just 5/2 to play in the first Ashes test according to Ladbrokes.
As the former Ireland player is confirmed as a member of  the series squad, the bookies give him a far better chance of making a first test appearance than the recalled Monty Panesar, who is 10/1 to play. Rankin is a 10/1 chance in the top England wicket-taker market leaving Panesar as the 25/1 outsider with Jimmy Anderson (2/1) and Stuart Broad (9/4) favourite and second-favourite respectively. 

England are the 6/4 favourites for the first test with evens the price they win the series, leaving them as odds-on (1/2) favourite to retain the Ashes. It's 33/1 the away side complete a 5-0 whitewash with 50/1 the price the home team pull off the feat. 

Alex Donohue of Ladbrokes said: "We're keen to keep Rankin on our side when it comes to top England series wicket-taker. He comes in with a good chance of making an immediate impact."


Ashes 2013/14

Australia 6/4
England evens
Drawn series 9/2

England to retain the Ashes 1/2

England to win 5-0 33/1

Australia to win 5-0 50/1

1st Test 

2/1 Australia
6/4 England
2/1 Draw

B Rankin to play in the 1st Test 5/2

M Panesar to play in the 1st Test 10/1

Top England Series Runscorer

A Cook 2/1
K Pietersen 7/2
I Bell 9/2
J Trott 9/2
J Root 5/1
J Bairstow 16/1
M Prior 20/1
M Carberry 20/1
G Ballance 20/1
B Stokes 33/1
S Broad 66/1
G Swann 150/1
Anderson 500/1
M Panesar 500/1
S Finn 500/1
B Rankin 500/1
C Tremlett 500/1

Top England series wicket-taker

Anderson 2/1
S Broad 9/4
S Finn 7/2
G Swann 7/2
B Rankin 10/1
C Tremlett 10/1
B Stokes 20/1

M Panesar 25/1

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,