Showing posts with label Shiv Chanderpaul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shiv Chanderpaul. Show all posts
Monday, October 22, 2018

Chanderpaul on the Unique Art of Batting

Most sports people get the chance to immediately put their mistakes right.

Nobody remembers, for example, that Andy Murray surrendered a 40-0 lead as he served for his first Wimbledon title in 2013 before eventually overcoming Novak Djokovic.

Nor is it now relevant that Sergio Aguero squandered two good goal scoring chances against QPR before stealing the Premier League title in stoppage time for Manchester City in 2012.

Similarly, when Andrew Flintoff dismissed Ricky Ponting with the seventh ball of his ‘Greatest Over’ in the second Ashes Test of 2005, there weren’t many in the feverish Edgbaston crowd ruing the earlier no ball that had forced him to run in again.

Yet had Murray, Aguero, Flintoff or countless others made such telling errors as batsmen – when one faulty piece of footwork, lapse in concentration or slight misjudgement can prove terminal – they might never have had the chance to atone.

It is why, according to Steve Bull, who was the England men’s team psychologist between 1997 and 2014, batting as a sporting discipline is “as close to unique as you can get”.

Bull formed part of the backroom team for the famous Ashes victories in 2005 and 2010/11, but was also present for lows such as the 5-0 reversal Down Under in 2006/07. He knows the intricacies of the game, having witnessed first-hand the effect that they can have on world-class players.

“A slight error of technique and you are out,” says Bull. “One mistake. The margin is so ridiculously small, and the consequences of a mistake are so huge.

“The knock-on effect is that after two or three low scores, the rest of the mechanisms kick in and the confidence starts to go.

“It can take you into the abyss.”

This is not news to Shiv Chanderpaul, a West Indies legend at international level, where flaws are exposed most brutally and scrutiny is most intense.

Chanderpaul is the fifth-most capped player in Test-match history, scoring 11,867 in 164 Tests at an average of 51.37, putting him eighth on the list of all-time top run scorers.

Yet he was still a victim of those same demons.

Chanderpaul spoke to Betway and here are some excerpts from that interview.

“He’s perfectly spot on there,” says Chanderpaul, when asked whether he agrees with Bull’s assertion.










































“These days bowlers study you more – it’s not that easy. Bowlers can tell when you’re struggling.

“In difficult conditions, you might be able to leave a few, but one or two you might nick off. It depends how long you’re able to stay out there, if you can get lucky and miss those balls.”

Luck is an element of the game that the standard observer can struggle to compute: it is intangible and incompatible with the narrative of failure that comes to define cricket teams. 

As Bull explains, a batsman can do “everything absolutely right” and still end up back in the hutch, an arbitrary feature of the game that can dictate the trajectory of a player’s career.

“There are many walks of life where, if you take control, if you’re confident, resilient and conscientious, it will take you far,” he says.

“In cricket, you can get that piece of bad luck, and that hard work comes to nothing.

“Conversely, if you’re in bad form and get dropped at second slip, then things go your way and you score a hundred: bingo. If that catch had gone to hand, that’s another failure.”

Cashing in when things are going your way was perhaps the key to Chanderpaul’s exceptional longevity.

“I would always go out and play a bit harder if my place wasn’t on the line,” he says.

“I would just fight as hard as I could, try and bat as much as I could. You don’t want to be in that situation when you’re being put under pressure.

“You feel a little more relaxed, but you dig in.”

Chanderpaul’s record meant that his place in the team was rarely at risk, though not everybody was convinced at first. His unusual technique – standing square-on to the bowler before shuffling into a sideways position as the ball is delivered – was long treated with suspicion and, in theory, gave bowlers a better chance of dismissing him.

“There wasn’t a coach telling me what I have to do, or where I have to be,” he says.

“But you still have to remember the basics – eventually getting into a side-on position. Remember these things, and go out there and try and use them to help you through whatever period you have to go through.”

The challenge is for batsmen who don’t yet have the statistics of a distinguished career to back them up to show the same mental strength.

“You can’t have a situation where your confidence is dictated by how many runs you’ve scored,“ says Bull. “That’s not a good state of affairs.

“That means that if you’re scoring well, you’re confident, and if you’re not, you’re not.

“Better players are resilient and tough players. They say: ‘I’m taking control of this. I’m going to feel confident. I’m feeling good in the nets, hitting the ball well, moving my feet.’

“That’s good psychology. If you are more of a worrier, very negative and very analytical, it can take you deeper into trouble.”

That is why Bull encourages several of his clients just to relax – “it’s a cliché, but sometimes the best thing you can do is take a break and switch off” – by going out for a drink or a day out.

“It is very much player-dependant,” he says.

“There were some players who liked structured thought and process-orientated strategy to get ready. With other players, the best they could do was to forget it.

“It takes you to a sports psychologists’ favourite maxim: control the controllable.

“When a player is worrying about whether they are going to get picked or not, they have no control. You’ve got to come to the next session completely refreshed and start again.”

Chanderpaul managed to combine that approach with avoiding the desire to step away from the game when unhappy with his form.

“If I was struggling, I would be in the nets, hitting some balls,” he says. “If I don’t feel good about it, I’ll do the work until I start feeling good.

“If I feel OK, I’ll ease off, take a breath, and not stress about it.”

That last point, according to Bull, is the key.

“Don’t let that voice in your head take over,” he says.

“Every day: start afresh, control the controllable, here we go.”

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Saturday, March 21, 2009

26 in 6!

4 6 4 4 4 4

And we thought Chanderpaul was a test player.

Well I guess when its Harmison bowling at you, anyone will fancy their chances.

Those were some cracking strokes!

46 from 30! You don't expect that stuff from Chanderpaul.

KP would be pleased to know that Chanders will be on his side come the IPL.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Sunday, May 25, 2008

New Zealand 1 - West Indies 1

England are chasing 294 against the Kiwis.

Australia are defending 286 against the Windies.

The 2009 Ashes are going to be very competitive!

With the way the English have batted during this series, they can probably play out the 180 overs over the next 2 days and draw the match.

They have been quite abysmal thus far and will do well to chase down that score against Vettori, who already has 6 wickets in the match, on a turning wicket.

Ross Taylor top scored in the match for the Kiwis earning me a point in Sportsfreak's tipping competition for bloggers for the 2nd test.

If England win and Vettori doesn't take anymore wickets I'll get a few more points for predicting the right winner and Panesar picking up the most wickets in the match.

But I don't see that happening. I see another Vettori 5-for and the Kiwis going 1 up with 1 to play.

The Aussies got to 431 in their 1st innings, which was more than what I thought they would get considering there was no Hayden, no Clarke, no Gilchrist.

In the 2nd innings the Aussies were bowled out for 167 a few moments back. That was lower than what I thought they would get.

The Windies must fancy their chances of chasing down 287 in a day and a half. If they can play out McGill, I think they should be able to get there.

Chanderpaul is in outstanding form, while Sarwan is, more often than not, at his best when chasing a total.

An exciting day and a half of test cricket awaits us. And the results of the 2 matches could surprise us all.

And then they said no one will watch the tests because of the 20-20 popularity.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


The IPL Test Centurions

Jacob Oram, Ross Taylor, Ricky Ponting, and Shiv Chanderpaul all had short stints in the Indian Premier League and all 4 hit test centuries during the last week.

Brendan McCullum who also appeared in the IPL made a run a ball 97 in last week's 1st test between New Zealand and England.

McCullum has a test strike rate of 65.07. He is still topping the IPL strike rate table, during which he scored at a rate of 204.34. His 97 came of 97 balls - 34.93 more than his career strike rate.

Oram's 101 in the 2nd innings of the same test was scored at a strike rate of 83.47, which is 32.48 more than his career strike rate of 50.99. His rate of scoring in the IPL was 150.00.

Taylor's unbeaten 154 in the 1st innings of the ongoing 2nd test between New Zealand and England came at a strike rate of 87.50. That is 29.02 more than his career strike rate of 58.48. His IPL strike rate was 183.95.

To put things into perspective, Micheal Vaughan scored 106 in the same test in which McCullum and Oram played these innings. Vaughan, who did not play in the IPL, scored at a rate of 49.53 runs per 100 balls.

Ricky Ponting and Shiv Chanderpaul had relatively less successful IPL stints than the New Zealanders mentioned above. They hardly got going and managed strike rates of 73.58 and 80.64 respectively.

Ponting's 158 in the ongoing 1st test between Australia and the Windies came at a strike rate of 70.53 (12 more than career SR), while Chanderpaul's 118 in the same test came at a strike rate of 42.75 (almost similar to career SR).

Out of the 5 test centurions and near test centurion that appeared in the IPL, only 1 scored at a strike rate less than his career strike rate. The other managed to score well above their career strike rates.

Is this a trend that will be more apparent going forward? Or is it just a one off coincidence?

Or maybe its just something about the Kiwis. They managed scoring rates that were faster by 30 runs or more than their career strike rates.

Have the Kiwis started playing more aggressive cricket? Or has the IPL had an impact on them?

I know it is too early to speak about how the IPL or 20-20 cricket has affected scoring rates in test matches but the trend above could go on to be an indicator of the times ahead.

Whoever thought that 20-20 cricket and leagues would kill test cricket. Think again.

I think it will make test cricket more exciting!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,