Saturday, February 28, 2015

Absolute CARNAGE at Eden Park!

Everyone was waiting for the Australia vs New Zealand match with bated breath. The two host nations and the two favourites to win the World Cup were expected to put on a breathtaking show.

Scores above 300 have become the norm in this World Cup. With the firepower in the Australian and New Zealand batting line ups, coupled with the extremely small boundaries of Eden Park, 300 was expected to be easily reached. Moreover, finally there was a game where people expected the side chasing the total to give a fight unlike the way it has been in previous games.

But, what happened out there was not what anyone expected.

The way Finch and Warner started the attack on New Zealand's opening bowlers, it seemed like 400 was on the cards! Warner and Watson continued in the same manner once Finch departed to a brute of a delivery from Southee.

But then a key move by Brendon McCullum, who is fast becoming the best captain in the game, in the 5th over of the innings, changed everything.

With Australia cruising at 51-1 after 6 overs, McCullum handed the ball to his most experienced campaigner, Daniel Vettori.

It was a huge gamble to give a spinner a go inside the powerplay.

Vettori, however, like the champion he is, delivered beautifully and put the brakes on and then finally removed Watson in the 13th over, and then Smith in the 17th over. In the middle, Southee removed Warner as well.

From 80-1, Australia has slid down to 96-4 after 17 overs. Some damage had been done, but it was still a decent platform with Clarke and Maxwell at the crease and Marsh and Haddin to follow.

But what followed was absolute carnage!

Boult, after an opening spell of 0-24 in 5 overs, returned for his second spell in the 18th over and in the span of 18 deliveries removed Maxwell, Marsh, Clarke, Johnson, and Starc to leave Australia reeling at 106-9!

18 deliveries. 5 wickets. 1 run.

No one could have seen that coming. I wonder what the betters went through. Betbind.com are a site where you to keep track of your betting history. For anyone who bets often, record-keeping is imperative. Without accurate tracking of wins and losses, it is impossible to understand what works and what doesn’t. 

That was the most devastating spell of fast bowling this World Cup has seen. Even better than Tim Southee's demolition of England.

Forget 300, Australia were struggling to go far beyond a 100.

Australia's last wicket pair of Haddin and Cummins tried their best to repair the damage and managed to take Australia to 151.

The Aussies, the best batting line up of the tournament, one of the favourites to win, had been bowled out inside 33 overs!

New Zealand's chase was expected to be a cakewalk but it was anything but that!

Their innings began much like Australia's, with Guptill smashing 10 runs of the first delivery thanks to a Mitchell Johnson no ball.

The kiwis were off to a flier, and despite losing Guptill early, McCullum kept going the way he knows best smashing Johnson to all parts of the ground! In 4 overs, Johnson has been carted away for 52 runs!

McCullum reached his 50 off only 21 deliveries, but then departed soon after with New Zealand at an absolutely smashing 79-2 in 8 overs.

Starc began the 9th over and removed Ross Tayor and Grant Elliot of the first two deliveries, either side of the break, in what would be the first of two times that he would be on a hatrick in the match.

New Zealand were 79-4 when Anderson joined Williamson in the middle, and both went about their task quite easily, before Maxwell struck to remover Anderson in the 20th over. New Zealand were 131-5 and needed only 21 runs to win, which should have been like a walk in the park.

But then Starc returned to cause havoc once more.

In the space of 5 deliveries, Starc removed Ronchi, Milne, and Southee. Cummins added the scalp of Vettori, and New Zealand found themselves 9 down with 6 runs still needed for victory.

New Zealand's number 11 survived two deliveries, and off the first ball of the next over, Williamson finished the game with a six!

In what was supposed to be a high scoring thriller, the match turned out to be one entertaining roller coaster ride.

The match barely lasted a total of 56 overs, but it was one of the craziest games of cricket I have ever seen.

Never have a I seen the battle of dominance between bat and ball to such an extent as I witnessed in this game.

When the bat dominated, the ball disappeared to all parts of the crowd at Eden Park. When the ball dominated, the stumps lay shattered!

There were 26 boundaries and 11 sixes in the entire match; meaning that 170 off the 303 runs that both teams scored collectively came through fours and sixes.

There were as many as 8 batsmen who got bowled in the match.

If there was ever a match that defined the word CARNAGE, this was it.

What a game!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


ICC World Cup 2015: Pakistan must recognize they are the better side against Zimbabwe & Associates

This article first appeared on DAWN.

After a break of over a week, Pakistan will take the field once again in this World Cup on Sunday, which will be the start of a crucial week for Misbah-ul-Haq's side, one that will decide its fate.

In a period of seven days from March 1 to March 7, Pakistan will play against Zimbabwe, UAE, and South Africa. After two big losses, Pakistan could not have asked for a better schedule. The matches against Zimbabwe and UAE are ideal for Pakistan to find some form and rhythm and finally open their account.
However it will be no easy ride given the way Zimbabwe and UAE have so far performed in the World Cup. The coaches of both the sides, Dav Whatmore and Aaqib Javed respectively, are well versed with the strengths and weaknesses of Pakistan; therefore, one can expect Zimbabwe and UAE to be more prepared for Pakistan than they have been for other teams.
Pakistan will also have to contend with Ireland on March 15, in their last group game. The first round exit at the 2007 World Cup, courtesy the Irish, will play on Misbah's mind for sure.
Pakistan's players and fans, though, need to also take inspiration from the past. Their record against the likes of Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, and associate nations in World Cup matches has been largely horror-free. Since 1996, Pakistan have played 12 matches against these countries and have lost only twice.
The key to Pakistan's success against Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, and the associates has been their bowlers' dominance.
While Pakistan have typically batted well in these matches, always posting a total in excess of 250 (except for two instances), it has always been their bowling that has enabled them to dominate the relatively weaker teams in World Cups.
Here are some interesting statistics for these matches, barring the two games that Pakistan lost to Bangladesh in 1999 and Ireland in 2007.
167 The highest score by an associate nation in a World Cup match against Pakistan.

130 The average score for associate nations in World Cup matches against Pakistan.

151 The highest score by Zimbabwe in a World Cup match against Pakistan.

130 The average score for Zimbabwe in World Cup matches against Pakistan.

The number of wins Pakistan has against Zimbabwe in as many completed matches in World Cups.

There is no doubt that bowling is going to be the key for Pakistan in their upcoming matches against Zimbabwe, UAE, and Ireland. The attack has conceded over 300 runs in both their World Cup matches and they will have to improve significantly starting this Sunday. We have already discussed how this is Pakistan's most inexperienced pace attack ever in a World Cup, but Mohammad Irfan, Sohail Khan, and Wahab Riaz have looked good in bursts. They will just need to sustain their performance over the duration of 50 overs.
Shahid Afridi, who was supposed to be Pakistan's strike bowler, has struggled and he will definitely need to pick himself up and be the potent force with the ball that he has been in the past. In hindsight, it was a mistake leaving Yasir Shah out against the West Indies, considering the damage Imran Tahir caused against them. He must play in Pakistan's remaining games as he can undoubtedly be the key with the ball against teams who will most certainly struggle against quality leg spin bowling.
Pakistan have dominated Zimbabwe and associate nations in World Cups thus far, and there is no reason why they can't repeat the dose.
The players can get on to the field on Sunday with some degree of confidence knowing that the Zimbabweans have never beaten them in a World Cup match. They should look to seek momentum with good wins over Zimbabwe and the UAE, which they can then take into the all important encounter against South Africa.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Tuesday, February 24, 2015

ICC World Cup 2015: A contest between top brands


As with many top sporting events, the Cricket World Cup is an opportunity for top brands to fight their way to key exposure. With over 1 billion viewers, it is no wonder that the Cricket World Cup is a top target for advertisers, brands and media groups. If you are wondering whether 1 billion viewers is a lot relative to other sporting events, remember that the Super Bowl typically has around 115 million viewers.

A recent article in the Australian reminded us that this phenomenon is not as new as we would think. In fact, back in 1996, Marqusee commented on what he described as the “subsuming of individuals into corporate identities”. Marxist comments aside, 10 years later, corporations are still fighting to align themselves with the world’s top cricket players.

Who is winning the battle of the sponsorship this year? Well Nike wins the battle of the brands in every domain when it comes to sports. Back in 2005 they chose to sponsor the Indian team exclusively. 10 years later, they have stuck to their guns and the iconic Nike swoosh continues to be exposed proudly on their kit. As Forbes put it, even though India may not be the favourite this year, they are still a brilliant choice because “no nation is more cricket-crazy than India, making the team a veritable goldmine of exposure for any associated brand”. This goes to show that the battle of the brands is not solely based on the sporting abilities of the team; other factors come into play such as the popularity of the sports in that country. In other news, Adidas snapped up England and South Africa, whilst favourite, Australia, was nabbed by Asics.

Beyond sponsorship, although brands have been capitalizing on cricket since the 90’s, what Marqusee did not foresee is the dominance of digital media. Indeed, this year, Facebook has added a specific ad-targeting option so that advertisers can pay to reach an audience of world cup cricket fans. This allows brands to tailor their messages to more precisely than ever before. The Twitter hash tag CWC15 also allows advertising to regroup conversations happening globally in order to better understand what cricket fans want.

Despite the rise of social media however, TV advertising continues to be a very important player. An Indian tech publication valued the advertising slots during matches at around RS1200 to RS 1500 crore. They have predicted that these prices will rise even further for the semi-final and final. This definitely goes to show that these are precious slot on Indian TV and brands are willing to pay millions of rupees to captivate the large audience watching.

Yet, another dimension of battle of the brands is the fight between TV channels to cover the event or gain exclusivity over a specific match. There was a lot of coverage around the UK struggle between BT Sport and Sky Sports over the rights for the ICC’s major tournaments. In the end, Sky Sports came out victor. For the exorbitant price of approx $2.5 billion they were able to secure the rights to 18 major ICC events between 2015 and 2023 (including the 2016 Cricket World Cup). This goes to show that big TV outlets are projecting themselves years in advance when it comes to budgeting for cricket coverage. This type of deal truly proves the prestige and weight of the cricketing industry on a global level.

Lastly, it is no surprise that the Cricket World cup provides a very important commercial platform for betting websites or any associated betting advice forums. At this time of the year, top betting brands like William Hill, Ladbrokes and Betfair are all competing to provide their members with the very best odds, deals and options. Whilst bets on the outcome of each match are offered all year around, large tournaments give more scope to niche wagers. For instance, bets can be placed on the best bowlers or batters, the worst teams or the best team within each group.

All in all, the Cricket World Cup 2015 provides a period of tremendous opportunity for sports brands, social media platforms, TV outlets and betting brands alike.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Saturday, February 21, 2015

ICC World Cup 2015: All Pakistanis, just wait for March!

The worst ever start to an innings in the history of ODI cricket. 1-4.

The largest defeat to the West Indies in the history of ODI cricket between the two teams. 150 Runs.

The largest defeat to any team in a World Cup match in the history of the ODI World Cup. 150 Runs.

Pakistan's worst ever ODI team has hit the bottom of the pit!

There is absolutely no lower they can go than this. Unless ofcourse they lose to UAE, Zimbabwe, and Ireland as well.

But that is not going to happen.

No way sir.

This is Pakistan we are talking about. This is the team that never starts well on foreign tours. This is the team that always takes time to settle into their best XI. This is the team that after hitting the lowest of lows picks itself up and turns into world beaters overnight.

After all, it is the same team that beat South Africa in an ODI series in South Africa for the first ever time in Pakistan's history. Barely a year ago!

So believe you me that this is what is going to happen from hereon...

1. Younis Khan will be dropped and his ODI career will end with a Golden Duck.
2. Nasir Jamshed will also be dropped and we will continue to enjoy his tweets.
3. Sarfraz Ahmed and Yasir Shah will be brought in.
4. Pakistan will beat Zimbabwe in a close encounter on 1st March.
5. They will then steamroll over the UAE on 4th March.
6. Against South Africa on 7th March, they will look like a complete professional unit and will win the game giving their confidence a tremendous boost.
7. They will beat Ireland and qualify for the Quarterfinals on 15th March.
8. They will beat whoever they face in the Quarterfinals. Pakistan will look full off purpose and no one would remember what happened against India and West Indies a month ago.

...

The rest you can finish.

Its no Bollywood story, it is Pakistan cricket. They have done it before and they can do it again. Sorry, they will do it again.

And no, not because they did it in 1992. When everyone was singing praises of #letsredo92 and talking about similarities with 1992, I was the only one who was trying to get people out of their warped timezones.

But I don't understand one thing. When every single fan of Pakistan asked for a repeat of 1992, why are they upset now when that is exactly what they are getting?

It is not 1992. It is 2015. It is the year you will see a major turnaround come March.

Wait for it!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Thursday, February 19, 2015

There's a secret to chasing, and Pakistan knows it

This article first appeared on DAWN.
When India posted 300, the match was as good as over for a majority of people considering how little confidence any of us have in Pakistan's ability to successfully chase totals in ODIs.
But for some, the hope lingered on. It was a flat pitch, the boundaries were short, and Pakistan's 'big hitters' had shown some form ahead of the match. The hope, though, remained just that; hope. Pakistan surrendered meekly, losing their way in the middle, like in so many other chases.
Looking at Pakistan's record while chasing in ODIs since January 1, 2010, there isn't much that one can conclude about their ability to chase. They have won almost as many games as they have lost while chasing in the past five years of ODI cricket. The record reads:
30 Wins

33 Losses

The problem is truly spelt out when one takes a look at ODIs in which Pakistan has been set a target of 250 or more. The record for that since January 1, 2010 is not a good reading. In the past five years, Pakistan has won less than 20% of the ODIs in which their bowlers conceded 250 or more runs. This record reads:
5 Wins

24 Losses

These 5 wins in the past 5 years include:

• Beat Sri Lanka by 4 wickets in Hambantota, August 2014 (Target: 275 in 45 overs [rain-shortened match])
• Beat Bangladesh by 3 wickets in Dhaka, March 2014 (Target: 327 in 50 overs)
• Beat New Zealand by 2 wickets in Napier, February 2011 (Target: 263 in 50 overs)
• Beat South Africa by 1 wicket in Dubai, November 2010 (Target: 275 in 50 overs)
• Beat South Africa by 1 wicket in Abu Dhabi, October 2010 (Target: 287 in 50 overs)
There's an interesting fact about these wins. Except for the win against New Zealand, where the total was chased down in 49 overs, all the other wins were achieved with just one ball to spare. This highlights one very important lesson in chasing: take the game till the end.
There are three key underlying trends in each of these successful run chases that Pakistan can pay attention to in future games.
1. Strong Contribution from an Opening Batsman
Ahmed Shehzad has been an instrumental figure in Pakistan's successful run chases of 250 and above. He played in three of these five ODIs against Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and New Zealand and knocked scores of 49, 103, and 42 respectively. Mohammad Hafeez also featured in a couple of these five wins with scores of 52 and 42 against Bangladesh and South Africa respectively.
While Ahmed Shehzad scored 47 in the loss against India, he got bogged down in the latter half of his innings. Additionally, the other factors that I discuss below did not feature prominently for Pakistan in their unsuccessful chase of 300.
There is no doubt that Shehzad will have to play a key role for Pakistan if they are to have a successful World Cup campaign.
2. Continuously Ticking Scoreboard
Fawad Alam is a proven match-winner for Pakistan, and his absence from the World Cup squad raised eyebrows everywhere. He played an instrumental role in three of these five ODI wins by ensuring that he kept rotating the strike in the middle overs, which has been Pakistan's biggest problem in run chases. Fawad did it brilliantly against Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and South Africa with scores of 62, 74, and 48 respectively. In each of these games he came in to bat between the 16th and the 23rd over and stayed at the crease till between the 42nd and 50th overs.
In the other two games, against New Zealand and South Africa, it was surprisingly Younis Khan who played the same role in the middle overs with scores of 42 and 73 respectively. Younis is the reason why Fawad is not in the squad, and if Pakistan expects him to play the same role in the World Cup then they need to play him at the right spot and not make him open the innings.
If not Younis, then Pakistan will have to find someone else, maybe Haris Sohail, to play the same role if they are to successfully chase down totals that teams are putting up in this World Cup.
3. Sustained Aggression
In one of the matches against South Africa, Pakistan required a run rate of 8 or more in the last 10 overs of their innings to win the match. Such a scenario is only possible if a team has wickets in hand, or someone plays a blinder at the end of the innings. For Pakistan, it has usually been the latter case, however in each of these five games there have been batsmen who have played scintillating knocks with quickfire finishes, and they have been well supported with aggressive late order hitting.
Against Sri Lanka, it was Sohaib Maqsood's unbeaten 89 off 73 deliveries with support coming from Shahid Afridi who remained unbeaten on 14 off 10 deliveries. Against Bangladesh, it was Shahid Afridi's blazing 59 off 25 deliveries and the support came from Umar Akmal who remained unbeaten on 14 off 9 deliveries. Against New Zealand, it was Misbah-ul-Haq who remained unbeaten on 93 off 91 deliveries and his support came from Sohail Tanvir who was unbeaten on 14 off 6 deliveries. Against South Africa it was Abdul Razzaq (33 off 38), Wahab Riaz (18 off 10), and Zulqarnain Haider (19* off 22) who collectively took Pakistan over the finish line. And in that memorable game against South Africa, it was Abdul Razzaq's blinder unbeaten 109 off only 72 deliveries. He didn't need any support!

It doesn't require much science to figure out that a successful run chase is scripted by a strong opening, a constant flow of runs in the middle overs, and a late flurry. In fact, the same is required when setting up good totals. In Ahmed Shehzad, Haris Sohail, Misbah-ul-Haq, Sohaib Maqsood, Umar Akmal, and Shahid Afridi, Pakistan have the personnel to assume those roles, but they need to be defined appropriately.

Pakistan's management and captain need to put their heads down and come up with the right combination that can provide them with desired results. Accommodating Younis Khan in the playing XI will not achieve that. Level headed decisions are the need of the hour and Pakistan cannot afford to be emotional about their senior players. If Shahid Afridi could take the decision to drop Shoaib Akhtar during the World Cup in 2011, there is no reason why Misbah cannot take the decision to leave Younis Khan out.
Ireland demonstrated the other day that totals in excess of 300 are chaseable. Their script was also very similar to what I described above. Paul Stirling provided the strong opening, Ed Joyce kept the scoreboard moving in the middle overs, and Niall O'Brien finished the game off.
If Pakistan are found in the middle of a 'Gayle-storm' on February 21, they will need to all of this and a bit more. But there is still plenty of cricket left in this World Cup and Pakistan has time on their hands to get their act together.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Wednesday, February 18, 2015

ICC World Cup 2015: Pakistan vs India Post Match Thoughts

Another World Cup. Another match against India. Another loss. A 5-0 record that had been spoken about endlessly before Pakistan's opening game of this World Cup now reads India 6, Pakistan 0. It is not a good reading for Pakistan fans, even though they can smile about the fact that Pakistan has won significantly more games than India in the history of ODI cricket between the two sides. For some reason, when it comes to World Cups, it just doesn't work for the Greens.

300 might be a daunting total, but on a flat Adelaide pitch with smallish boundaries, it was definitely chaseable. Pakistan lost the game when they lost 3 wickets for 1 run in 8 deliveries during the middle of their chase. Good catching by the Indians and misfortune combined to end a million Pakistani dreams. Yet Pakistan fans must not lose heart, for this is just the start of the World Cup and it has been proven in the past that a loss to India means nothing in the grander scheme of things. 

The bookmakers though remain unfazed by the result of this first game with Pakistan still remaining at 22/1 to win the tournament outright and India sticking at 8/1, which are the same prices as when the tournament began. Things are likely to change in the market after the second round of matches (especially if Pakistan fail to beat the West Indies).

Odds taken from Bet365 - if you're planning to join read this review to find out what's on offer.

Here are my 5 key post match thoughts.

1. Sohail Khan lived up to his word and proved everyone wrong

The biggest silver lining for Pakistan was Sohail Khan's heartening performance. Sohail received plenty of criticism due to his performances, or rather the lack of, in the matches leading up to this World Cup. The general perception had become that the pace bowler from Karachi was all talk and no action.

However, he was the pick of the Pakistan bowlers against India, and lived up to his word of attacking the Indian batsmen and picking up the coveted wicket of Virat Kohli, whom Sohail had openly targeted before the match.

Sohail Khan became the first Pakistani bowler to pick up a 5 wicket haul in his first World Cup match, and only the third bowler to pick up a 5 wicket haul in a Pakistan vs India World Cup match.


2. Virat Kohli Proves why he is one of the best

The difference between the two teams in my opinion was Virat Kohli. He played a completely unnatural innings and held it together for India. It was not a typical all guns blazing Kohli innings but a more sedate and responsible innings, which was the need of the hour in a crunch game for India. One must remember that Kohli was woefully out of form going into this game and he had not performed at all in the ODIs India played in Australia for their World Cup build up.

But Kohli showed why he is India's and the world's best and brought his best to open India's World Cup campaign with a bang.

Kohli became the first Indian batsman to score a century in a World Cup game against Pakistan. Prior to this game, India's best individual score was Sachin Tendulkar's 98 at Centurion in 2003. Kohli's 107 is now also the highest individual score by any batsman from either side in a Pakistan vs India World Cup match.


3. Pakistan's Spin Twins Fail

Pakistan had high hopes from Yasir Shah who has been in wicket taking form since the beginning of the season. There is definitely something about Yasir, who is regarded by Shane Warne as the best leg spinner in the world currently; but he failed to deliver today. He was Pakistan's most expensive bowler in the game with his 8 overs going for 60 runs. Much was expected from Shahid Afridi as well who was supposed to be Pakistan's ace given the lack of experience of Pakistan's pacers. But he too failed with the ball.

Perhaps, everyone forgot how good Indian batsmen are against spin. Pakistan's 20 overs of spin, 8 each from Yasir and Afridi and 4 from Haris, cost them 136 runs and got them no wickets. While their 30 overs of pace resulted in 6 wickets for just 162 runs.


4. How long will Pakistan persist with Younis Khan?

I fail to understand what Pakistan's fascination with Younis Khan is. Everyone knows that he is a world class test batsman. The world's best in my opinion. But everyone one also knows that he is an utter failure as an ODI batsman. He was not supposed to be a part of Pakistan's World Cup plans, yet a public outburst and a significant amount of test runs, resulted in his inclusion at the completely unfair expense of Fawad Alam.

Fine, he made it into the squad, but why is Pakistan persisting with him in the playing XI when he is continuously failing. Pakistan's middle order of Haris Sohail, Misbah Ul Haq, Sohaib Maqsood, and Umar Akmal pretty much selected themselves. Yet Pakistan were so desperate to include Younis Khan in the XI that he was asked to open, a role that he has never done internationally or domestically. That too in a World Cup match.

I wonder what Pakistan would have done if Hafeez was still around. How would they have fit in Younis Khan then?

With Sarfraz Ahmed and Nasir Jamshed, two batsman who have opened for Pakistan, on the bench, it made absolutely no sense to open with Younis Khan. The reason given for dropping Sarfraz from the XI was that he has been unable to score runs in NZ and Australia in the build up to the World Cup. Well how many runs has Younis Khan scored?


Opting for Younis over Sarfraz meant that not only were Pakistan already playing with one wicket down, they also lost their specialist wicket keeper. Sure Sarfraz has lost a bit of form in new conditions, but he is a valuable player. He can take the attack to the opposition, and is also a safer bet behind the stumps than Umar Akmal.

If Pakistan are serious about this World Cup then they need to get their XI right and they need to stop reeling under the pressure from a senior player who insists on playing with total disregard to what is good for the team. If Shahid Afridi could drop Shoaib Akhtar during the World Cup in 2011, there is no reason why Misbah Ul Haq cannot do the same to Younis Khan.

5. Umar Akmal does not deserve criticism

Umar Akmal was the last of the three wickets that Pakistan lost in the span of 8 deliveries and he has been severely criticized; not only for getting out for a duck, but also for dropping Virat Kohli when he was on 76. I don't think Kohli's drop at that stage made much of a difference; India would have still got to 300 had they lost Kohli then.

Regarding U Akmal's batting; I have said it before and I will say it again, he is a proven performer. He played crucial knocks, 39 off 41 and 65 off 66, in both of Pakistan's successful chases in the warm up matches against Bangladesh and England respectively. He has consistently scored runs for Pakistan in limited overs cricket, and he will continue to do so.

On top of all that, I also believe that he got a harsh decision. The snicko hardly moved from its baseline. I am not sure what Steve Davis saw and how he thought that the evidence on screen was conclusive enough to overturn the on field umpire's decision. When the big screen showed "OUT", it shocked not only the viewers, but also the commentators. It was a shocking decision in my opinion.

As I mentioned in the beginning, a loss to India means nothing in the grander scheme of things. Pakistan lost to them in 1992 yet won the World Cup. They lost to them in 1999 yet played the Final. They lost to them in the Asia Cup in 2012 yet won the Asia Cup title. They beat them in the Asia Cup in 2014 but lost the Asia Cup Final.

The tournament has just begun and Pakistan's campaign has a long road ahead. With a little bit of tweaking of the XI, the Greens can rise again. 

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Who is Australia's next great all-rounder - James Faulkner or Mitchell Marsh?

With Shane Watson struggling for form with both bat and ball, the arguments will have already started around water coolers across the country about who our next all-rounder will be to play Test, One Day International (ODI) and Twenty20 cricket for the next decade.

It’s hard to compare all-rounders of the modern era with those of the past such as Richie Benaud, Jack Gregory and Keith Miller due to the enormous amount of 50-over and Tweny20 cricket played around the world today. But given Australia has produced only one truly great all-rounder in Miller, and we’ve enjoyed considerable success in all forms of the game throughout history, there’s an argument to suggest we don’t even need a great all-rounder, just a very good one.

We also happened to be blessed with a wonderful fast bowler who can bat a bit, so do we even need a very good all-rounder to fill the hole that will be eventually left by Watson in the short term? Mitchell Johnson has scored almost 2,000 Test runs (including a century) and almost taken 300 Test wickets, a feat, when achieved, that will put him in rare company. In the shorter forms of the game, his batting average is obviously much less, but he has scored many handy lower order runs at about a run a ball. But he is 33, and surely time isn’t on his side either.

In the shorter versions of the game, the requirement for a genuinely excellent all-rounder or two in the line-up in obvious, and Australia have an embarrassment of riches. Shane Watson, James Faulkner and Mitchell Marsh are three outstanding talents at varying points of their cricket careers, and no country comes close to having this sort of depth in this World Cup. And that’s without mentioning Glenn Maxwell who can bowl some handy spin and has 28 wickets at an average of 38.03 in ODIs.

Shane Watson is almost 34, has a checkered history with injury, which admittedly has been less frequent in his later years, and his light is slowly dimming on what has been an excellent international career. If he doesn’t have long to go, and all indications are he’s near the end, which of Faulkner or Marsh could step into the all-rounder role in all forms of the game?

Faulkner is just a year older than Marsh at 24, but it seems like he’s been around the state and international scene for a lot longer than his main rival. He has been Tasmania’s best player during their recent wonderful period of success, winning the Sheffield Shield competition in 2010/11 and 2012/13. During those three seasons, which included a losing Shield Final in 2011/12, he won three consecutive Ricky Ponting Medals.

He made his international debuts in both ODI and Twenty20 formats in 2013 and has been ever-present since. He has played 38 ODIs, with a batting average of 48.12 at a strike rate of 111.11, and has 50 wickets at 32.36. By anyone’s standards, they are quite simply remarkable figures. He has only played the one Test match, making 23 and 22 runs while taking six wickets, including 4-51, at an average of 16.33. It’s obviously early days in the longer form of the game, but that is a very good start.

From a young age Marsh was destined for the Australian team. His father was an Australian opening batsmen, playing 50 Tests and 117 ODIs, before coaching the national team to the 1999 World Cup title. Mitch grew up in the Australian dressing room, and went on to captain the Australian under-19 team to victory in the 2010 World Cup in New Zealand. He played state cricket for the first time at 17-years-of-age, the youngest player ever to play domestic one-day cricket in Australia. He made his Twenty20 international debut as a 19-year-old in 2011, before making his Test debut in 2014 against Pakistan in the UAE, making 47 and 87.

At 23, Marsh has a long time ahead of him in the game. In 15 ODIs, he averages 36.91, and has taken 11 wickets, while his Test and Twenty20 international careers have only just begun having played just four and three games respectively. He is young and raw, but with an incredible amount of talent and the world at his feet. In the first game of this World Cup he smashed 23 runs off just 20 balls, and then took 5-33 to send England packing in an ominous warning to the rest of the competition.

Given his experience you’d have to think James Faulkner is the heir apparent to Shane Watson’s title of Australian cricket’s number one all-rounder, if he isn’t there already. But in Mitchell Marsh he has an understudy who has the talent to forge his own long and successful international career in all forms of the game. It’s going to be interesting, and a lot of fun, to see which of these two young, exciting all-rounders emerges as the number one over the next 10 years.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Saturday, February 14, 2015

ICC World Cup 2015: Why Pakistan will finally turn the tables on India

This article first appeared on DAWN.

Pakistan versus India is not just a game. It is an event of epic proportions keenly watched by over a billion people around the world.
The battle between the two teams is always anxiously anticipated, and when it happens in a World Cup, the stakes are at another level altogether. On February 15, 2015, Pakistan and India will take the field once again and open their World Cup campaigns on the back of a less than ideal build up.
Both teams have been under significant pressure entering the tournament. India have had a horrendous two and a half months during which they have lost all their international matches in Australia. Pakistan, on the other hand, have had a disastrous year of ODI cricket where they have not been able to win a single series.
India, ranked number two in ODIs, despite their less than favorable run up to the World Cup, will enter the field on the 15th as firm favorites. On paper, India's team is significantly stronger; man for man each one of their top 6 batsmen is arguably better than Pakistan's. The Indians have been playing in Australia and are accustomed to the conditions; Pakistan's entire squad comprises of only three players (Younis Khan, Shahid Afridi, and Umar Akmal) who have previously played an ODI in Australia.
And above all, the mother of all statistics, the dreaded number 5. Pakistan have never beaten India in the five times they've faced off in World Cup encounters.
Despite all this, there are enough reasons to believe that this time round, Pakistan will finally turn the tables.
1. The last time a Pakistani batsman hit a 6 in the final over against India to win the game by one wicket, it scarred an entire generation in India, which could not recover for a decade and a half. I don't need to remind anyone what happened in the last ODI played between these two teams. Two words: BOOM BOOM.
2. It might be 5-0 in India's favor but it is 3-3 in the past four years since the last World Cup. Pakistan just need to hone in on the fact that India is winless in Australia, apart from their warm up win against Afghanistan, for about 10 weeks and keep reminding them about that.
3. India's mighty batsmen don't look all that mighty when the play in Australia, or against Pakistan. MS Dhoni is the only one who has maintained some level of consistency across all three: Career, in Australia, and against Pakistan.
4. Sohail Khan said the famous words "Kohli wohli hoga woh apne ghar me" (Kohli is a champion only in his backyard). That may sound like an empty threat considering that a relatively unknown pacer is sledging one of the world's best batsman. But it really isn't that empty a threat.

5. Pakistan's pace attack is the most inexperienced in this World Cup with their five fast men combining for an ODI experience of 97 matches. In terms of combined average, economy rate, and strike rate, they rank pretty low low as well. But the only team in this World Cup that ranks just above them is India.

6. SHAHID AFRIDI. Not only is he Pakistan's biggest match winner ever in ODIs (32 man of the match awards), he is also the team's key bowler in this world cup given the inexperience of the pace attack and absence of Saeed Ajmal and Mohammad Hafeez. Afridi has always performed exceptionally well with the ball in ICC tournaments and the bounce he will get in Australia will make him even more dangerous.

7. Nasir Jamshed is back for Pakistan, and even though he has not had a good time in international matches of late, he has absolutely dominated India every single time he has played against them. India will be wary of him at the top of the order.

8. Misbah-ul-Haq and Shahid Afridi were at the wrong end of the result in the final of the World T20 in 2007. They were on the losing side again in the semi-final of the World Cup in 2011. This is their last chance to redeem themselves and give the Pakistani fans what they have been waiting for for 23 years!

It is going to be a gargantuan task but the Green shirts are up for it. They are more determined than they have ever been before and we all know what the Pakistanis are capable of when they have their backs well and truly to the wall.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


ICC Cricket World Cup Infographics Part 2: 1996-2011

Click on the centre to view an enlarged picture






These infographics are brought to you by Asiabet


Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Friday, February 13, 2015

ICC Cricket World Cup Infographics Part 1: 1975-1992

Click on the centre graphic to to get an enlarged view






Inforgraphics via Asiabet

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Ahmed Shehzad - Pakistan's Greatest Opener Ever?

The past year (2014), was the year when Ahmed Shehzad stamped his authority and made one of Pakistan's opening positions his own across all formats of the game.

After making his debut in 2009 as an 18 year old opening batsman, Shehzad found himself on the sidelines after his first ODI series for Pakistan. He remained on the sidelines for two years before briefly returning to international colours just before the World Cup in 2011. A tour of New Zealand, a World Cup in India and Sri Lanka, and a tour of West Indies later, he was gone again. No one really knew why considering he had opened for Pakistan and knocked a century in New Zealand and another one in the West Indies. Despite a disappointing World Cup, he did not deserve to be dropped.

Rumours were that he was punished for his closeness with Shahid Afridi who was at loggerheads with the PCB Chairman at the time and had announced his retirement from the game.

Shehzad was the best opening batsman in the country but he was still not a part of the team. He continued to pile on the runs in domestic cricket, and finally made another return to the side in the middle of 2013 on another tour to the West Indies.

18 months since then and Shehzad has undoubtedly become a mainstay of the side, one of the few players who is key to the team's success across all formats, and is well on his way towards becoming the best opener produced by the country.

After establishing himself as Pakistan's opener in the limited overs formats, Shehzad made his test debut at the start of 2014 in the series against Sri Lanka. In his 5th test innings, he produced a magnificent 147, and followed that up with two more test tons during the year against Australia and New Zealand.

In March 2014, he recorded his first ever T20I century, becoming the first Pakistani to score a hundred in the T20 format, and only the 7th batsman in the world (at the time) to record a century in each format of the game. (Faf du Plessis became the 8th batsman earlier this year).

2014 was truly the year that brought Ahmed Shehzad to the world stage. He is only 23 and has an entire career ahead of him. He has already achieved so much and one can just start to imagine what he may be able to achieve going forward given his immense talent and potential.

He has scored runs against all comers and in all conditions. His international centuries have not only come in the subcontinent and the UAE, but also in South Africa, New Zealand, and the West Indies. He is yet to play international cricket in England, and the upcoming World Cup will be his first international outing in Australia.

After just 57 innings as an opener in ODIs, he is already the 8th highest run scorer for Pakistan in that position. His 6 ODI centuries as an opener are bettered only by Salman Butt (8), Rameez Raja, and Pakistan's best opener ever, Saeed Anwar (20).


What I find even more impressive is the fact that he has 6 ODI centuries in only 58 ODI innings; that is a remarkable conversion rate with Shehzad scoring an ODI century every 9.7 innings. Comparing that with innings:centuries ratios of Pakistan batsmen who have scored at least 5 ODI centuries, shows that only Zaheer Abbas scored ODI centuries at a faster rate.


There are only 10 batsmen in this world among the top 8 ODI teams who take less than 10 innings to score their next ODI century; Ahmed Shehzad is one of them!


Sure we are still in the early stages of Shehzad's career and the challenge for him lies in maintaining the stature that he has already achieved, but there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that he is well on his way towards greater things.

Shehzad's best days are still ahead of him. When you think of the best ODI batsmen to have played the game you think of Sachin Tendulkar, Ricky Ponting, Virat Kohli, Hashim Amla, and AB De Villiers to name a few. Not all of them started off on the same note that they achieved later in their careers.

Sachin Tendulkar did not score his first century in ODIs till his 76th innings! Yet he went on to score more ODI centuries than anyone in the history of the game.

Shehzad's career stats compare well against those of some of the greatest ODI players at the same stage in their career; i.e. after 58 ODI innings. Only Amla, among the batsmen shown below, stands out from the rest. All the other batsmen have pretty much the same figures at the same stage in their careers.


Only Hashim Amla had more centuries against his name than Shehzad does after 58 ODI innings. There is an uncanny similarity between the careers of Pakistan's greatest opener ever, Saeed Anwar, and Shehzad after 58 ODI innings.

And there's not much difference between what Ponting and De Villiers had achieved at the start of their ODI careers and what Shehzad has achieved.

As I already mentioned, the challenge for Shehzad is to maintain this same form throughout his career. There is no doubt in my mind that he has the ability and the will to do so.

There is also no doubt in my mind that he will.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Is this Pakistan's weakest ever pace attack?

This article first appeared on DAWN.

Junaid Khan's injury and his subsequent ouster from the World Cup was quite depressing for Pakistani fans. Misbah-ul-Haq's side was going to Australia and New Zealand without their premier strike fast bowler with the team already hampered due to the bowling bans on Saeed Ajmal and Mohammad Hafeez.
A bowling attack that could have read Irfan, Junaid, Afridi, Ajmal, Hafeez now looks extremely barren.
Though Ajmal has been cleared by the International Cricket Council since then, his continued omission from the squad despite injuries to a couple of members of the World Cup squad remains bewildering.
The inclusion of Rahat Ali (in place of Junaid Khan), who has only played one ODI in his entire career, means that three of Pakistan's frontline bowlers in Rahat, Sohail Khan, and Ehsan Adil have a collective experience of 10 ODIs. This is not only Pakistan's most inexperienced bowling attack ever in a World Cup, but arguably the most inexperienced bowling attack ever fielded by any of the Test playing nations in a World Cup.
Pakistan's pace attack comprises of Mohammad Irfan, Wahab Riaz, Ehsan Adil, Sohail Khan, and Rahat Ali. Collectively, the five pacers have played 97 ODIs and picked up 126 wickets. This is the most inexperienced pace attack among the 10 Test playing nations in this World Cup. Even the lowly-ranked Bangladesh and Zimbabwe have a more experienced pace attack than Pakistan.
Not only that, but each one of the Test playing nations, except India and West Indies, have included at least one pace bowler who has played more ODIs and taken more ODI wickets than Pakistan's five pacers combined!
Pakistan's pacers have not only played the least number of ODIs and picked up the least number of wickets, but they rank low in terms of average, economy, and strike rate as well. Among the 10 Test playing nations competing in this World Cup, Pakistan's pacers' bowling average is better only than Zimbabwe's. In terms of economy rate, they are better than India's and Zimbabwe's, and their strike rate only pips Bangladesh's and Zimbabwe's.
I think we can safely say that barring Zimbabwe, Pakistan has the worst pace attack in this World Cup among the 10 Test playing nations.
Not only is Pakistan going into this World Cup with the worst pace attack, Pakistan is also going to be fielding their worst pace attack ever in their history of their World Cup appearances since 1992.
A comparison of Pakistan's pace attack in this World Cup with that in previous World Cups since 1992 yielded the following results.
(Figures for bowlers before the start of the World Cup; e.g. Wasim Akram's figures used for 1992 are those that he had achieved before the start of World Cup 1992)
Not only is this pace attack lacking in experience, but also in performance. Their economy rate is the worst of all previous World Cup attacks that Pakistan has had, and their average is better than only that of the attack in 2007. Only slightly.
It is indeed a sad state of affairs when Pakistan, which has traditionally been spoilt for choices, struggles to field a competitive pace attack. A country that has possessed some of the finest pace bowling talent in the world for over six decades is now the worst in the world. The mind keeps going back to the time when even totals as low as 200 were easily defended. Currently, the side failed to save the game even after scoring 313, that to against a New Zealand Board's Presidents XI.
Bowlers used in this analysis:
From the 2015 World Cup Squads:
Australia: Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, James Faulkner, Pat Cummins
Bangladesh: Mashrafe Murtaza, Al-Amin Hossain, Rubel Hossain, Taskin Ahmed
England: James Anderson, Stuart Broad, Steven Finn, Chris Jordan, Chris Woakes
India: Mohit Sharma, Mohammad Shami, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Umesh Yadav, Stuart Binny
New Zealand: Tim Southee, Kyle Mills, Trent Boult, Mitchell Mclenaghan, Adam Milne
Pakistan: Mohammad Irfan, Wahab Riaz, Sohail Khan, Ehsan Adil, Rahat Ali
South Africa: Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel, Vernon Philander, Wayne Parnell, Kyle Abbott
Sri Lanka: Lasith Malinga, Nuwan Kulasekara, Suranga Lakmal, Thisara Perrera, Dhammika Prasad
West Indies: Jason Holder, Kemar Roach, Jerome Taylor, Andre Russell, Sheldon Cottrell
Zimbabwe: Elton Chigumbura, Tendai Chatara, Solomon Mire, Tawanda Mupariwa, Tinashe Panyangara
From Pakistan's World Cup Squads:
1992: Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, Aaqib Javed, Wasim Haider
1996: Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Aaqib Javed, Ata-Ur-Rehman
1999: Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Shoaib Akhtar, Abdul Razzaq, Azhar Mahmood
2003: Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Shoaib Akhtar, Abdul Razzaq, Azhar Mahmood, Mohammad Sami
2007: Umar Gul, Mohammad Sami, Rana Naved Ul Hasan, Azhar Mahmood, Yasir Arafat, Iftikhar Anjum
2011: Shoaib Akhtar, Umar Gul, Sohail Tanvir, Wahab Riaz, Abdul Razzaq, Junaid Khan

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,