Thursday, March 31, 2016

Women’s World Twenty20: What Happened England?

The England Women Cricket team was destined for greatness in the inaugural Twenty20 tournament that took place in 2009. In the final match, they faced a consistent New Zealand team who were the host nation but, through Katherine Brunt, who had an opening spell of 3 for 6 bowled out New Zealand for 85. England was too strong for New Zealand, especially with Claire Taylor, who was in inspired form, led them to a comfortable six-wicket victory. But this marked their only Women’s World Twenty20 victory. In the 2010 event, England was bundled out at the group stage: the next two Women’s World Twenty20 events were agonising as they finished runners-up in the 2012 and 2014 games beaten by their arch rivals, Australia. In this year’s event, for the third time in a row, England’s race for the World T20s was cut short by Australia at the semi-final stage: this is a hurting defeat.

This was not a strong versus the weak type of encounter. Both Australia and England were regularly found wanting, especially in the initial ten overs in the field. England showed the first signs of complacency when they bowled a touch that was too wide for the incredible Lanning, who had a classy half-century as a result of her high-quality shots played through the off side. Australia too was complacent with the ball, but Megan Schutt was in the form of her life with incredible inswingers.

The key players for Australia came in the shape of Megan Schutt, Alyssa Healy and captain, Meg Lanning. It is the captain who hit a composed 55, while Alyssa Healy recorded a rapid 25 as Australia accumulated 132-6. For the England team, Tammy Beaumont and Edwards had a perfect start of 133 off to continue their excellent partnership that went to new heights in this year’s Women’s World Twenty20. They played well together to add 67 for the first wicket inside ten overs.

England came into the Women’s World Twenty20 semi-final against New Zealand after winning four of their group matches, but the signs of fragility had been showing especially with the bat. Against India, England lost their nerve and showed poor decision making by dropping from 42-1 to 92-8, it was Anya Shrubsole, the number 10 who dropped the ball before she lashed with the winning runs through backward point. England’s lack of concentration was also evident when they faced West Indies and collapsed from a 59-0 to 109-9, in this game, Merissa Aguilleira was the most culpable when she lost her cool and ran for the stumps with ball in hand allowing Rebecca Grundy to come in and steal the last ball of the innings.

In the semi-final against New Zealand, England failed to pick up on the momentum started by Beaumont and Edwards. With only seven overs remaining, they just needed 45 with nine wickets in hand, but panic got the better of them leading to their ultimate defeat. It all started when Beaumont was caught over after playing an unnecessary slog, Natalie Sciver bowled an overambitious scoop and bowled third ball and then Erin Osborne was smacked by Heather Knight for a long on. England laid their hopes on Sarah Taylor who was badly out of form: she played a dismal reverse sweep that was caught to sum up their shallow thinking and ultimately, sealed their fate.

The one area that England should improve is to learn to build on their early momentum. If they managed another five runs, they would have had a super over but they failed to capitalise. They also need to learn how to hold their nerve, avoid fumbles and play tactical and smart cricket. With this record, would you
bet on England for the next Twenty20? Let us know in the comments below.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: ,


How Good is Virat Kohli?

This article first appeared on DAWN.

Virat Kohli’s masterful chase against Australia a few days ago excited the cricket world beyond boundaries. Everyone is talking about how great Kohli is and how he compares to other batting legends. Headlines have hailed how he is better than Sachin; Sambit Bal tweeted that he is to Pakistan what Miandad used to be to India; and social media forums are in a frenzy over discussions comparing Kohli with Viv Richards, Ponting, ABD, and others.

There is no doubt that he is an exceptional talent and a phenomenal batsman. There is no doubt in my mind that his unbeaten 80 odd against Australia was the best T20 knock I have ever witnessed. Kohli has played similar outstanding knocks in ODI cricket as well and he definitely is the king of all chases. No one chases a target like Kohli; no one builds an innings in a chase like Kohli; no one has won matches for India like Kohli has; no one has won matches for anyone like Kohli has.

He really is exceptionally good. But how good really?

It is not only difficult but probably wrong to compare batsmen of different eras. Limited overs cricket has changed so much in the favor of batsmen that averages and strike rates are inflated in these modern times. Shorter boundaries, bigger bats, field restrictions, bouncer limitations, better pitches, and many other one-sided rules have resulted in a plethora of batsmen averaging above 50 in ODIs, which was unheard of in the 80s and 90s. Plus, batsmen these days don’t face Wasim, Waqar, Garner, Marshall, Lillee, Thomson, Ambrose, Donald and the likes.

Currently, there are 7 batsmen who average above 50 in ODIs and only one of them (Bevan) made his debut in the 90s. In T20 cricket, there is only one batsman who averages above 40 – Virat Kohli – he averages 55.42 !!! The next best T20 average is 38.96.

In terms of numbers there are other modern day ODI batsmen that are as good as Kohli is; however there are none in T20 cricket. No one even comes close! His T20 average is 16 runs more than the next best. That is a significant difference and shows how well Kohli has mastered the art of batting in the shortest format.

While compare averages and strike rates across eras cannot be compared, I think there is one factor that can be definitely compared – the match winning ability of batsmen. I believe that we can fairly compare a batsman’s contribution to wins irrespective of era, conditions, rules, and opposition.

There are 50 batsmen that have scored around 4,000 runs in ODI wins. Sachin Tendulkar and Ricky Ponting are right at the top of this list with both scoring over 10,000 runs in wins. In terms of average, Virat Kohli’s 67.5 in wins is third on the list, behind Hashim Amla’s 68.3 and Ms Dhoni’s 73.1. These numbers individually represent greatness; however the only way to compare the overall impact of a batsman in wins for his country is to develop an index that can take out biases with respect to era, conditions, rules, and opposition. While some bias may still remain, I tried to take into account 4 key factors to come up with the Match Winning Index (MWI); which is calculated as an average of these 4 factors:

Percentage of Innings played in wins;
Percentage of runs scored in wins;
Percentage of centuries in wins;
Percentage of not outs in wins.

(Key Note: When you take a percentage, you automatically rule out the absoluteness of a number. For example scoring 8-10 ODI centuries in the 80s is equivalent to about 15 centuries in the 90s and 25 centuries or more in the post 2000 era. However how many of them were scored in wins eliminates this bias. Moreover, a percentage of not outs is considered in order to eliminate the bias towards top order batsmen who have more opportunity to score centuries than lower order batsmen who may contribute a valuable 30 or 40 in a winning cause)

Here are the Top 20 match winning batsmen in ODIs.



Sir Viv Richards right at the top!

That should put to rest any discussion on whether Kohli is better than the best ever ODI batsman or not. Kohli ranks 16 on this list; however among Indian batsmen he is at the top. No other Indian batsmen has contributed to wins as much as Kohli has with only Gambhir and Sehwag coming close to him. It is also fair to say that Kohli still has majority of his career ahead of him so we will surely witness this modern day great reach greater heights.

While Kohli may not be as good as Viv Richards was, nor as good as many other modern day batsmen as an ODI match winner, he is the best India has produced. For comparison, Sachin (MWI of 0.655) ranks 43rd on this list.

It is interesting to note the high number of Australians at the top end of the table. As many as 6 of them played as part of the same team also. No wonder they won so many ODIs and lead the tally of most World Cup wins.

For Pakistan, Mohammad Yousuf and Saeed Anwar stand out; but it is also interesting to see that Saleem Malik (0.728), Younis Khan (0.714), Shahid Afridi (0.711), Ijaz Ahmed (0.698), and Inzamam Ul Haq (0.687) were great contributors to ODI wins for Pakistan, and hence the dominance in the 90s.

Coming back to Virat Kohli; it is a different story altogether when you compare the MWI for batsmen in T20 Internationals.



Barring Afghanistan’s animated Mohammad Shahzad, Virat Kohli is the best in the business when it comes to winning T20 matches for India. He has the best ever T20 average, he is the only batsman to average above 40 in the format, and he has the best ever T20 average in wins. Virat Kohli is a T20 giant and a master of the format.

I can understand the euphoria created by that explosive and perfectly executed innings against Australia. We also tend to live in the moment and forget about other greats that have played the game. It is fair to say that Kohli is the best T20 batsman out there and the biggest T20 match winner the world has seen. It is also fair to say that he is the best ODI match winner produced by India; however he is some distance away from being the best in the world.


Kohli may well end his career as the best limited overs batsman ever and he may well be counted among the test greats one day as well; but there is some time till that happens. For now, we should just enjoy his mastery and the effortless ease with which he bats.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Sunday, March 27, 2016

Pakistan is not a decade, rather only 20 odd runs, behind...

Our "legends" Javed Miandad and Wasim Akram have been harping on about how Pakistan cricket is a decade behind the rest of the world.

Really guys? You think we are so stupid that we will listen to your lame comments and believe that we suck?

Come on.

Firstly, which rest of the world are you talking about? South Africa? Sri Lanka? West Indies? Bangladesh? Australia?

It does not take a genius to look around and figure out that it is really only New Zealand that is playing exceptional T20 cricket at the moment. Every single other team has struggled at one moment or the other.

The likes of ABD, Amla, Steyn, de Kock could not take a team to the semis, and you expect that Afridi, Shehzad, Akmal, Wahab would have? Even a team comprising of Warner, Maxwell, Watson, Finch, Faulkner is on the verge of being knocked out. As is a team comprising of Kohli, Dhoni, Sharma, and Ashwin!

It was a World T20 tournament. Sure we such at ODIs too, but at least we are among the best test teams in the world, if not the best. Isn't that the real cricket everyone keeps talking about?

So please don't exaggerate and make the public believe that we are so bad that we require your useless services to get out of this rut.

We don't need you, thank you! We all know what you are capable of, or not, so please you may be legends in your own right, but PAKISTAN is NOT 10 YEARS BEHIND OTHER TEAMS.

If anything, we are about 20 odd runs behind.

We lost to New Zealand by 22 runs. We lost to Australia by 21 runs. We lost to India and had we scored another 20 odd runs the result might have been different.

So we are really only 20 odd runs behind. And that is definitely not equivalent to 10 years!

And those 20 runs can easily be brought about by replacing a couple of batsmen in the T20 line up.

One doesn't need an overhaul for that.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Friday, March 18, 2016

MS Dhoni, Rich on and off the Field

Mahendra Singh Dhoni is widely considered to be one of the world's best finishers, on top of that he has been included in Time 100's list of the 'Most Influential People in the World', and a Bollywood biopic entitled MS Dhoni: The Untold Story, is currently in the making.

The captain of the Indian cricket team is among the best paid athletes on the planet, bringing in more money per year than the likes of FC Barcelona's Neymar, Formula 1 star Kimi Räikkönen and the fastest man in the world, Usain Bolt. He is also the only cricketer to appear in last year's Forbes top 100 highest paid athletes and his net wealth is estimated at over $100 million.

Despite cricket's global appeal, the sport trails behind the likes of soccer and American Football in terms of money within the game, so just how has MS Dhoni catapulted himself above people like Neymar and Wayne Rooney when it comes to income?

First off, MS Dhoni is a giant of the game. He is widely regarded and believed to be the best Indian captain of all time. Aside from his prowess as a player, he has been noted for his leadership skills, making bold decisions when it came to player selections.

He was the ICC ODI player of the year in 2008 and 2009, has featured in the ICC World ODI team 6 years in a row and was awarded the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna, the most prestigious award in Indian sport. This alone made Dhoni a hugely valuable commodity, but there is more behind MS Dhoni's wealth than his prowess on the pitch.

All of the world's biggest sports stars are the face of advertising campaigns, and Dhoni is no different. In 2015 he brought in $27 million from sponsorship alone. He is the face of international Pepsi and Reebok deals, and in 2014 he signed a very lucrative deal with Spartan Sports. Outside of this he also fronts a number of advertising campaigns within India.

In 2010 he signed a $42 million deal with Rhiti Sports, who now manage his image and continue to further his brand inside and outside of India. A keen footballer in his youth, he has since taken up a position as co-owner of ISL side Chennaiyin FC, and has his hand in several other companies.


This means that while his playing career may be drawing to a close, his presence as an international figure will remain, especially if the Indian Super League grows at its predicted rate.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: ,


Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Australia set out in search of their first World Twenty20 Title


"STEVE SMITH" (CC BY-SA 2.0) by NAPARAZZI

With the World Twenty20 now under way in India, there are a number of sides vying to lift the trophy of this young tournament for the first time. Although Australia have dominated the cricket world in nearly every respect over the years, they have thus far failed to make their mark on this modern, fast-paced version of the game. This could be the year in which that is about to change.

Belief

There is plenty of belief within the Australian squad, with the ambitious captain, Steve Smith, stating that they are here to try and claim the elusive title once and for all. The Baggy Greens are coming into the tournament on the back of a T20 series win over South Africa, and this should give them a confidence boost and allow them to take some momentum into the tournament. At the time of writing, Smith and his teammates are 9/2 with 32red Australia and Unibet to win the tournament, while the hosts, India, are priced at around 3/1.

For a nation with such a rich cricketing history, and a sense that cricket runs through the blood of the country’s inhabitants, it seems strange that they haven’t conquered the game in this format. The players and the fans are now starting to believe that this is long overdue, which could spur the team on to try harder and claim the title this time out.

Squad
Many found the squad selection for this World Cup to be a rather mysterious one. Some big names were left out and lesser known players were included. The selectors have argued that it is too hard to pin down Australia’s best T20 squad, and that is the reason behind the controversial selections. Although there has been debate over whether the players selected are the best available, there is certainly enough quality there to get the job done.

Peter Nevill will take over behind the stumps, and this decision to bring in the nation’s best wicketkeeper for this tournament has been hailed as a smart move. To have a specialist keeper in the squad also emphasises the selectors’ faith in the strength of the batting line-up.

They have some of the world’s best hitters in the team, with David Warner at 14/1 with 32red and 10bet to be the tournament’s leading batsmen. Smith, Usman Khawaja, Shane Watson, and Aaron Finch, make a considerably strong top order on paper.

Josh Hazlewood will lead the bowling attack but it could come down to Australia’s young spinners, Adam Zampa and Ashton Agar, to make the difference in favourable conditions for turn.

Opponents

The Baggy Greens will have been elated upon hearing the news that the hosts of the tournament and favourites to win the title were beaten by New Zealand in the opening match. The Kiwis pulled off a shock 47-run victory over India and now the hosts face a challenge to top their group and put this early defeat behind them.

Another of Australia’s main rivals are South Africa, who are 4/1 to win the tournament with Unibet, 32red and Betway. If Australia progress from the group stage they may well encounter these able foes on the route to the final. Although Russell Domingo’s players suffered a demolition at the hands of England in the recent Test series at the turn of the year, they bounced back and pulled off convincing victories in the following One Day and T20 series. They have one of the world’s most dangerous batsmen in their ranks with AB de Villiers, who, at 9/1 to be the top tournament batsman, is a force to be reckoned with on his day. Many are anticipating him to enjoy a devastating return to form on the world stage.

Australia will also have to contend with their closest rivals, New Zealand, in the group stage. With only two teams progressing from each group, it could be a fierce battle between the two teams to claim one of the top places in the “Group of Death”.  


Australia certainly have the ability within their ranks to produce a victory in this tournament, and at a time when their main rivals seem to be faltering they could well take advantage. But first they must claw their way out of this tough looking group.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Monday, March 14, 2016

ICC World T20: Stop making a mockery of everything Shahid Afridi says

So Shahid Afridi has done it again!

He has made a statement and the media from Pakistan to India has gone haywire.

The statement in all its essence was a simple one, "we get a lot of love in India, in fact the love we receive here is more than what we get in Pakistan also".

Why can't we perceive such statements for their positivity and diplomacy?

Why does the Pakistani media need to label such a statement as blasphemous?

Why are Pakistani TV anchors sending laanat towards Afridi?

Why does the Indian media have to read into it as a statement made to lick their underbelly in return for an IPL contract?

Doesn't everyone know the drama that ensued in the build up to Pakistan's arrival in India for the World T20? 

Threats from ATFI, threats from Shiv Sena, threats of protests outside the stadium, threats of digging up the pitches in Dharmashala and Kolkata, statements from ministers in Dharamshala stating they won't provide security, threats of hand grenades...

Despite all these threats, the authorities worked round the clock to ensure Pakistan make it for the global event.

On the face of such threats, all Afridi is doing is sending across a message that majority of the Indian public adores them and adores them more than their own Pakistani public. What is so wrong with that?

Why is it so offending?

It is a message to those making threats to back off.

It is a call out for support from the Indian public who is being swayed away by extremists.

And what is wrong about the statement? Ask the players, or just be around them in Kolkata to witness the love they are receiving.

The hotel staff, hotel guests, bus drivers, waiters, shop keepers, general public, everyone around them are all Indians and they are treating the Pakistan team players like heroes. 

So seriously, calm down, chill out, and stop making a mockery of a diplomatic statement given by Pakistan's captain in the wake of significant threats to the team.

And if you think about it with a cool head, you will realize that Afridi was just doing simple maths!




Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, March 9, 2016

ICC World T20 2016: The Teams to Watch

For any cricket lover the most exciting time for watching cricket is the World Twenty20 and 2016 is no different. There are always certain teams that are just the teams to watch.The first groups for the tournament have been announced and everyone is really looking forward to the excitement.  Here are the top five contenders that you should be keeping an eye on.

India

Right on top of the list is India and they really are a team to watch during the World Twenty20. India is not only to be the host this year they have also been ranked the number one team. India is standing at a rating of 127 with 3169 points after 25 matches. Playing on home ground is one of the biggest advantages in cricket and with Indias young and energetic team, they are sure to keep everyone on the edge of their seats. They have extraordinary batting talents and they have excellent bowlers. They usually play a strong game from the beginning to the end. 

West Indies

Second on the list is West Indies, and despite winning back in 2012 they really are going to have to play hard to win against India. Currently trailing at nine ratings behind. They are standing at a rating of 118, with 2249 points after 19 matches. Their major strength comes from their batters and they are usually just behind India when they meet in tournaments.

South Africa

The third team to watch is South Africa, standing at a rating of 118, with 3428 points after 29 matches. South Africa seems to be a wild card when it comes to the T20s. They have come close to winning on many occasions with just some bad luck missing it each time. They are a team to watch because you never know how they are going to play and what their outcomes are going to be.

New Zealand

Fourth on the list is New Zealand at a rating of 116, with 2787 points after 24 matches. With an impressive batting order whether its the top or middle, they are undoubtedly strong. An all-rounded team in both batting and their bowling which could earn them a important wins early on in the competition.

England

Fifth on the list is England, standing at a rating of 112, with 2462 points after 22 matches. Even though England is a strong cricket team they can easily lose focus when they are put under a lot of strain. Their performance often fluctuates in matches, often easily winning and sometimes spiraling out of control. You will need to keep an eye on them to see what happens.


Whether you are a fan of these top five or prefer to support other teams with one of these bonus codes, you should definitely keep an eye on the action. 2016s World Twenty20 promises to be one the most exciting and nail biting cricket tournaments that we have seen in a while.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Sunday, March 6, 2016

Where is the Accountability in Pakistan's Selection Process?

Mukhtar Ahmed was selected to open for Pakistan in T20s. In his first 3 matches he scored 37, 83, and 62. Then in the next 3 matches he was dismissed for 2,4, and 4. After 6 T20s for Pakistan, Mukhtar averages more and has a higher strike rate than any opener for Pakistan in T20s. Why did the selectors discard him after 3 bad innings?

Sami Aslam was selected in Pakistan's test and ODI squads. In 2 tests, he could not score more than 20. In his only ODI he scored 45. Why was he dropped from the ODI squad?

Ahmed Shehzad, in his first 8 tests, scored 3 centuries and 2 fifties. He averaged 48. In his next 3 tests he had scores of 9, 43*, 1, 69, 21, 0; and then he was dropped from the test team. Sure he has not been up to the mark in ODIs and T20s but why was he dropped from the test team?

Since 1st January 2015, Mohammad Hafeez has played 22 ODIs for Pakistan and has piled up 900 runs (including 2 centuries and 6 fifties) at an average of 42.85 and strike rate of 86.12. In the same period he has played 7 tests where he has scored 710 runs (2 centuries and 2 fifties) at an average of 59.16. Whereas, in 15 T20s during this period he has only 1 fifty; in his other 14 innings he has crossed 25 only once. Why does he continue to play T20 cricket for Pakistan?

Khurram Manzoor did well in one day games against the England Lions. He also performed well in the National One-Day Competition. Why was he selected in a T20 squad?

Sherjeel Khan made his ODI and T20 debut for Pakistan at the end of 2013 and played both formats for 6 months. After an impressive 61 on ODI debut, he failed miserably in his next 10 ODIs. In 3 T20s during the same time he had scores of 18, 34, and 50. Why was he dropped from both formats after that and didn't continue playing only T20s?

Fawad Alam has an ODI and Test average of over 40. He was Pakistan's leading run scorer in ODIs in 2014. He made a century on test debut. He keeps piling on the runs in domestic cricket. Why is he continuously ignored?

Anwar Ali has played 22 ODIs and 16 T20s for Pakistan. He has been a permanent feature of the team for the past 2-3 years. He averages 52 and 35 with the ball respectively in ODIs and T20s. Why does he continue to get selected?

Sohaib Maqsood had a very impressive start to his ODI career scoring 50s in his first 2 ODIs. He continued to do well in ODIs leading Pakistan to some memorable victories. In 25 ODIs he averaged 32 and had a strike rate of 84. During the same time, he didn't do well in T20s at all with a highest score of 37 in 15 T20s and an average of under 15. After the World Cup in 2015 he got injured. Since his comeback he has played T20s only, where he failed, and eventually got dropped. Why hasn't he played ODIs since his injury? Why wasn't he dropped from T20s long before?

Junaid Khan has picked up 78 wickets in 52 ODIs at an average of 27 and an economy of 5.27. He also has 71 wickets in 22 tests including five 5-wicket hauls. Why hasn't he played a single international game for Pakistan for almost a year?

Mohammad Nawaz has an impressive List A and First Class record as a batsman. He opened for NBP throughout last season and performed admirably. In the PSL he batted at 4 or 5 for Quetta Gladiators and impressed everyone with his aggressive batting. He was more than a handful with the ball and was also among the top wicket takers of the league. Primarily a batsman, why was he played only as a bowled in the recent Asia Cup? Why wasn't he included from the get go to bat in the top 6?

Imad Wasim has 7 wickets from 8 T20s at an average of 22. He also has 7 wickets from 6 ODIs at an average of 29. His economy is phenomenal, 6.1 in T20s and 4.7 in ODIs. Sure, he had a poor PSL but why didn't he play a single game in the Asia Cup?


*                     *                    *

I know there are many more examples that I can include here. There is an endless list. But the above is enough to understand that Pakistan's selectors are mindless and totally incapable of maintaining any sort of continuity.

Can someone please explain why Pakistan's selectors and team management are so inept? Why are they incapable of understanding something as basic as performance? Why can't they differentiate across formats? Do they not understand cricket that well? Do they not understand a player's temperament and ability in each format? What are the basis for the decisions they make? Why is there no accountability for the school-boy errors they make on a continuous basis? Why do they make decisions based on emotions rather than logic, rationale, and performance? Does no one look at the data?

It really makes me wonder if Pakistan's selectors have any sort of sense at all.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Thursday, March 3, 2016

Why was Ahmed Shehzad dropped in the first place?

Imran Farhat, Shahzaib Hasan, Awais Zia, Imran Nazir ... Pakistan has had a number of mediocre openers in the past. The list is endless.

But there have been none worse than Khurram Manzoor.

Just like Sami has for the bowlers, Khurram has set the bar really really low for Pakistan's openers!

If reports of Ahmed Shehzad being recalled for the World T20 to replace Khurram are true, then I could not have woken up to better news.

Sure Shehzad has had a bad year in international cricket. He has been woefully out of form. However; he did well in the PSL. If Sharjeel Khan and Khalid Latif can be selected due to their PSL performances then there was no reason to drop Shehzad in the first place.

Despite his recent bad form, Ahmed Shehzad has been Pakistan's most trusted opener, along with Mohammad Hafeez, across formats in past 6 years. There is absolutely no reason why Shehzad and Hafeez should not be opening for Pakistan across formats.





If only Pakistan's selectors smoked a little less pot and paid more attention.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Sami's no ball changed everything!

I have so many thoughts after Pakistan's loss last night to Bangladesh that I don't even know where to start.

Even though Pakistan has won the Asia Cup only twice, they did manage to reach the final of the past two tournaments in 2012, which they won, and 2014. And no one really expected them to be knocked out by Bangladesh; I guess therein lies the problem.

Pakistan were clean sweeped by Bangladesh just a year ago, so the result should not be a surprise.

But it hurts.

It really really hurts.

We could have still won it had Sami not turned up half stoned in the 19th over. Sure the batsmen had failed, 129 was never going to be enough, and Soumya Sarkar had almost taken the game away in the first 10 overs. But Pakistan had fought back well. Irfan, Aamer, and Afridi were exemplary with the ball and kept Pakistan in the hunt. Even Sami's first 3 overs were spot on and kept the runs in check.

If it was not for that no ball of the 4th delivery of the 19th over, Pakistan would have sneaked through.

Think about it.

Had Sami landed his foot behind the popping (no pun intended) line, Mashrafe Murtaza would have holed out and Bangladesh would have had to get 15 off 8 with 4 wickets left.

Instead they required 12 off 9 with 5 wickets in hand.

That one delivery lost the game for Pakistan.

Mohammad Aamer got banned for 5 years for bowling one no ball. Sami should be banned for 10!

Because if we don't Pakistan's mindless selectors will recall him again and again and again ...

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, March 2, 2016

ICC World T20 2016: Betting Preview

According to the betting markets, India are the favorites to win the ICC World T20 2016.

Considering that they are the number 1 ranked T20 team, they clean sweeped Australia 3-0 in the recent T20 series, they are looking like the strongest team in the ongoing Asia Cup T20, and that the World T20 will be played in their back yard, the betting markets are quite right.

For punters the markets are also offering wagers on the leading batsman of the World T20 with Virat Kohli the favorite among all batsmen. Rohit Sharma and AB De Villiers are also near favorites.

With the way Kohli has been scoring in the past two months, it is hard to imagine anyone out scoring him in the World T20.

Likewise, it is going to be tough to beat India at home, where they are typically invincible.

If there is any team that can realistically stop the Indian juggernaut, it is New Zealand or Australia; however the latter are not favored by the betting markets.

Check out Pokies Palace for odds on a number of bets that you can place for the World T20.

You can place bets on likely semifinalists, likely stage a team will exit the tournament, the top batsman for each team, the likely position of each team in their respective group, and many others.

Cricket always offers punters a wide variety of betting options.

These are all pre-tournament bets; when a match gets underway it increases the number of things one can bet on.

Every ball is like an event. You can bet on each single ball of the match!

World events like the World T20 are boom time for the betting markets, which witness a significant increase in betting activity during the World Cup and World T20.

I know of people who have already taken a punt on the likely winner and on where certain teams will end in the tournament.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Shahid Afridi still deserves to be in the team

No one divides emotions among Pakistanis the way Shahid Afridi does. There are fans who still believe that he is the only match winner the team has, and then there are critics who believe he is well past his sell by date and should have hung up his boots some time ago.

I am not sure why our fans go into a hyper frenzy mode before every world event. Our lead up to the ICC World Cup 2015 revolved around wanting Misbah to leave ODIs and let Afridi captain. Our lead up to the ICC World T20 2016 is about removing Afridi as captain and replacing him with God knows who!

Why?

Since the World Cup 2015, Pakistan's record in ODIs and T20s has been as follows:

vs Bangladesh: LOST ODIs 3-0; LOST T20s 1-0
vs Zimbabwe: WON ODIs 2-0; WON T20s 2-0
vs Sri Lanka: WON ODIs 3-2; WON T20s 2-0
vs Zimbabwe: WON ODIs 2-1; WON T20s 2-0
vs England: LOST ODIs 3-1; LOST T20s 2-0
vs New Zealand: LOST ODIs 2-0; LOST T20s 2-1

ODIs: WON 8 LOST 11
T20s: WON 7 LOST 5 TIED 1

Our ODI team and T20 team have mirrored each other in the series that Pakistan has played since the World Cup 2015. Both teams have been under performing. However, our T20 team has won more than it has lost and it has done relatively better than the ODI team.

But somehow, all that seems to be Afridi's fault.

How?

So why hasn't the ODI team improved after the departure of Misbah and Afridi? Weren't they the biggest problem the team had?

Logic is always thrown out the window the moment Pakistan cricket fans try to become analysts.

Now let us turn our focus to Afridi's performance as a player. A number of critics believe that his current form is not good enough for him to be in the team.

Really? I wonder where these critics are when Afridi is winning games for Pakistan.

Here's a look at the 13 T20 matches Pakistan has played since the World Cup 2015, barring the ongoing Asia Cup.

Pakistan vs Bangladesh

Only T20: Scored only 12 and conceded 0-25 in 3 overs. Pakistan lost.
FAIL

Pakistan vs Zimbabwe

1st T20: Scored 4* of the only ball he faced and conceded 0-28 in 3 overs. Pakistan won.
NEUTRAL

2nd T20: 7(3) and 1-36 in 4 overs. Pakistan won.
FAIL

Pakistan vs Sri Lanka

1st T20: Came to bat in the last over and scored 8(4); and 0-31 in 4 overs. Pakistan won.
NEUTRAL

2nd T20: Came to bat with Pakistan 40-5 in 7.2 overs while chasing 173. Scored 45(22) and set up the chase for Anwar Ali and Imad Wasim to finish it off. 1-30 with the ball. Pakistan won.
PASS

Pakistan vs Zimbabwe

1st T20: Came to bat in the last over and scored 2(3). 0-23 with the ball as Pakistan defended 136.
PASS

2nd T20: Came to bat in 17th over and scored 2(2). 0-26 with the ball as Pakistan defended 136.
PASS

Pakistan vs England

1st T20: 0 and 0-33. Pakistan lost.
FAIL

2nd T20: Came to bat at 120-6 in the 17th over while Pakistan were chasing 173. Scored 24 off 8. Pakistan lost by 3 runs. Pick of the bowlers with 3-15.
PASS

3rd T20: Came to bat at 65-5 in the 12th over while Pakistan were chasing 155. Scored 29 off 20 as Pakistan tied the game. Pick of the bowers again with 2-19.
PASS

Pakistan vs New Zealand

1st T20: 23(8); 2-26; 4 catches; 2 run outs; Pakistan won; man of the match.
PASS

2nd T20: 7(3) and 0-38. Pakistan lost.
FAIL

3rd T20: 8(8) and 1-27. Came to bat at 55-5 as Pakistan collapsed to 101 all out.
FAIL

So then in 13 T20s in the past year, Afridi has given a good (PASS) performance in 6 matches; he has given a fair (NEUTRAL) performance in 2 matches; and he has failed (FAIL) in 5 matches.

Based on this performance will you kick him out of the team?

No seriously tell me, does this mean his place in the team is not justified?

Even if you consider those 2 neutral performances as a fail, it means he did well in 6 matches and failed in 7 matches.

Is that not good enough for you?

For the past week, since an interview was published where Shahid Afridi was quoted as saying that there was a lot of pressure on him from friends and family to continue playing T20 cricket for Pakistan even after the World T20, every single facebook group, whatsapp group, and social media platform has been abuzz with the Afridi debate.

I am tired of arguing and I hope to God that this can at least show the haters / critics that no Afridi is not past his sell by date. nor is he a liability on the team. He has performed over the past year and deserves his spot in the XI on current form.

And that interview was just an honest statement from a man who doesn't mince any words. Surely there are many people out there who don't want Afridi to retire. They want to see him play forever. That's all he said. He never said he is not going to retire.

Our fans have a knack of dramatizing everything. Emotional qaum hai, kya karein.

Afridi will retire at the end of the World T20. Till then he is our T20 captain.

Till then it will be great if we can remember him fondly and remember what he has done for Pakistan, rather than talk about what he hasn't.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Misbah was not the issue in ODIs; Afridi is not the issue in T20s !

Every time Pakistan loses a match, the fans blame the captain; and this seems to escalate every time a world event is around the corner.

Misbah was not good enough to lead the ODI side. Azhar Ali is not good enough to lead the ODI side. Shahid Afridi is not good enough to lead the T20 side.

Then who the hell is good enough?

Just like Misbah copped an unfairly huge amount of criticism for Pakistan's abysmal ODI performances under his captaincy, Shahid Afridi is the man that the entire Pakistan seems to be after.

What everyone fails to realize that whether it has been Misbah, Hafeez, or Afridi at the helm of our ODI or T20 teams, Pakistan has been in a constant decline in these formats for the past 5 years. The reasons for this decline are plenty, but the choice of captain is not one of them.

The same Misbah led Pakistan to the top of the test rankings. The same Misbah led Pakistan to the bottom of the ODI rankings.

So no, it was not Misbah's captaincy. He was the most consistent batsmen our ODI team had. And no, it is not Shahid Afridi. He is the only match winner our T20 team has.

The problem has always been our batting and that will not change even if you bring back Imran Khan to captain our ODI and T20 teams.

The only reason our test team has been so successful is because we have had the same set of batsmen in stable batting positions. Hafeez, Azhar, Younis, Misbah, Asad, and Sarfraz have been a constant, while the likes of Taufeeq, Khurram, Shan, Shehzad have rotated in the second opener's position. This has been the case for the past 5 years.

Take one look at the ODI and T20 teams and it is a model of inconsistent selection. Players are chopped and changed, their batting positions are moved around. Nothing is stable.

I just can't understand why the team management can't apply the same success formula. The same consistency of selection and the same stability to the batting line up.

And for God's sake stop criticizing Afridi. He has got a month of international cricket left in him. Support him and let him retire in peace.

Hadh hoti hai!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,