Cricketers take charge in Pakistan
All of a sudden it seems that former test cricketers are finally getting together to run cricket in Pakistan.
Better them than the bureaucratic administrators who had been doing the job thus far.
While Intikhab Alam and Ijaz Ahmed will get together to watch the Pentangular Cup match (read: Shoaib Akhtar) between Punjab vs Federal Areas match in Islamabad from Friday, a host of former cricketers have been invited by law minister Farooq Naek on Saturday to join the 15-member committee that is reviewing the constitution of the PCB.
Javed Miandad, Wasim Akram, Saleem Malik, and Rameez Raja have been included in the existing committee, which also includes Najamuddin Khan, who as Sports Minister had tried to nominate himself as the PCB Chairman before Ijaz Butt was nominated by Zardari.
Farooq Naek is the Chairman of the committee, while Shoaib Malik and Misbah-Ul-Haq have been its members since it was formed.
So my question - what happens to Ijaz Butt once the constitution has been reviewed? What if the committee decides that the Chairman should be elected through a democratic process involving the state associations?
If the committee is serious about improving the constitution then Ijaz Butt's appointment seems to be an interim one as further changes can be expected when the new constitution is put into place.
But then this could very well be a dragged and long drawn process - it took this constitution 8 years to get drafted!
So how long it will take the new one and how many Chairman the PCB will have during this time is something I don't even want to think about.
Though I hope that Farooq Naek and his committee are more serious than the previous men who have tried to do the same.
I've heard that this committee has been reviewing the constitutions of the cricket boards in India, Australia, and South Africa in order to gain ideas on improving the PCB's constitution.
This committee is also trying to come up with idea on how to restructure domestic cricket in Pakistan.
Hence the inclusion of Miandad, Wasim, Malik, and Rameez makes sense. But why not Imran Khan who has been talking about changing the domestic structure for the last 4 decades?
Will these men be able to change what has been there for as long as cricket has existed in Pakistan?
Including making Shoaib Akhtar perform without breaking down?
Better them than the bureaucratic administrators who had been doing the job thus far.
While Intikhab Alam and Ijaz Ahmed will get together to watch the Pentangular Cup match (read: Shoaib Akhtar) between Punjab vs Federal Areas match in Islamabad from Friday, a host of former cricketers have been invited by law minister Farooq Naek on Saturday to join the 15-member committee that is reviewing the constitution of the PCB.
Javed Miandad, Wasim Akram, Saleem Malik, and Rameez Raja have been included in the existing committee, which also includes Najamuddin Khan, who as Sports Minister had tried to nominate himself as the PCB Chairman before Ijaz Butt was nominated by Zardari.
Farooq Naek is the Chairman of the committee, while Shoaib Malik and Misbah-Ul-Haq have been its members since it was formed.
So my question - what happens to Ijaz Butt once the constitution has been reviewed? What if the committee decides that the Chairman should be elected through a democratic process involving the state associations?
If the committee is serious about improving the constitution then Ijaz Butt's appointment seems to be an interim one as further changes can be expected when the new constitution is put into place.
But then this could very well be a dragged and long drawn process - it took this constitution 8 years to get drafted!
So how long it will take the new one and how many Chairman the PCB will have during this time is something I don't even want to think about.
Though I hope that Farooq Naek and his committee are more serious than the previous men who have tried to do the same.
I've heard that this committee has been reviewing the constitutions of the cricket boards in India, Australia, and South Africa in order to gain ideas on improving the PCB's constitution.
This committee is also trying to come up with idea on how to restructure domestic cricket in Pakistan.
Hence the inclusion of Miandad, Wasim, Malik, and Rameez makes sense. But why not Imran Khan who has been talking about changing the domestic structure for the last 4 decades?
Will these men be able to change what has been there for as long as cricket has existed in Pakistan?
Including making Shoaib Akhtar perform without breaking down?






I think this moment is the most appropriate Ganguly moment. It is something that defines him and describes the kind of competitor he was / is.


Its good to know that despite all the media speculation regarding the seniors and all this talk about replacing them with juniors, the cricket authorities still show them the respect that they deserve.
One such reporter was doing just that when he started about how Australia was playing mind games with India.
Requiring 14 to win of the final over, Misbah lost the strike of the 3rd ball and Ahmed Hayat could not get any of the next 3 deliveries away as Sohail Khan gave away only 5 runs in the crucial 20th over of the innings.

.jpg)

