Friday, July 31, 2009

Why Hughes, Why not Hussey?

Since making his debut, Phil Hughes has played 5 tests; 3 against South Africa and 2 against England in the on going Ashes series.

His scores in those 5 tests read:

0, 75, 115, 160, 33, 32, 36, 4, 17

In those same tests Michael Hussey's scores read:

4, 0, 50, 19, 20, 39, 3, 51, 27

Moreover, we all know what a nightmare Hussey has had before these string of scores.

Then why does he continue to retain his place but poor Hughes, who was touted as the next big thing in Australia, gets benched?

If Shane Watson just had to play then he could have easily come in for Hussey.

Why drop Hughes and put Watson in a make-shift position?

I would have surely preferred Hughes, Katich, Ponting, Clarke, North, Watson instead of the line up Australia have gone in with for this 3rd Ashes test.

And what did Hussey do today - another first ball duck!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Umar Akmal Has Got to Play

Pakistan's middle order at the moment looks extremely congested with big names like Younis Khan, Mohammad Yousuf, Misbah, Fawad Alam, Shahid Afridi, and Abdul Razzaq.

Even Shoaib Malik and Kamran Akmal are part of that when they are not opening.

Then how does a new and upcoming promising batsman like Umar Akmal make his way into the side?

It is not easy but at times tough decisions need to be taken.

The names mentioned above are big ones; most of them senior and experienced cricketers who have served Pakistan for a long time.

But when things are not going right, something has got to give. Pakistan cannot keep hanging on to these tried and tested players just for the sake of seniority.

Misbah's ODI form has been patchy for a long time now; Mohammad Yousuf's brief absence actually gave Pakistan a much better balanced ODI outfit.

Then why is Pakistan hell bent on continuing with these batsmen?

Particularly when someone like Umar Akmal is waiting for his chance.

Umar has been in awesome form and this is the best time to give him a taste of international cricket.

In his last 6 first class and List A games against Australia A and Sri Lanka A, Umar has smashed 4 centuries.

Form like that cannot be ignored; moreover his exuberance and aggression can do Pakistan a lot of good, especially when the current middle order is failing to fire.

Come to think of it, it should not even be such a hard decision to take.

If Younis Khan is thinking 2011 then he should not be thinking of Yousuf and Misbah as a part of those plans. I believe it is time for Yousuf and Misbah to concentrate on test cricket and be told that there was no longer a place for them in the ODI team.

That way Umar Akmal can come into the middle order; as can Shoaib Malik with either one of Nasir Jamshed or Imran Nazir partnering Kamran Akmal at the top.

Pakistan should not repeat the same mistake they did with Fawad Alam by keeping Umar on the bench for two years before giving him a proper chance.

Umar Akmal has got to play tomorrow!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


The Shock in London

So far London has been good to me.

Everything from the chest x-ray at the airport to the customs, the cab ride, and the DLR train ride, have been smooth sailing.

The weather was a bit fickle but not something that made me think "why am I here?".

However, the fact that there was no coverage of the 1st ODI between Pakistan and Sri Lanka, made me think that!

Can you believe that?

I mean this is England, the "home of cricket", and a cricket series is not being covered on TV.

Sure the Ashes are going on and all of England is busy following that, but that does not mean that they ignore all the other cricket being played.

The Ashes are being shown in the UAE and Pakistan and India, then why isn't the Pakistan vs Sri Lanka series being shown here?

With that shock, I was given another when I opened the scorecard of the 1st ODI on Cricinfo.

I was shocked to see that Pakistan had won the toss and chosen to field first.

I was shocked to see that after having Sri Lanka down at 131-6, Pakistan let them get to 232.

I was shocked to see that Muralitharan smashed 32 off only 15 deliveries.

I was shocked to see that Shoaib Malik opened the batting.

So let me understand this; Malik does not open in the tests and a debutant in Fawad Alam is thrown at the deep end. Then when Fawad does well, he is pushed back down the order, while Malik is sent to open.

Does anybody see the logic in this?

And if this was the plan then why have Nasir Jamshed and Imran Nazir in the squad.

The failure of Malik, Yousuf, Younis, and Misbah did not shock me.

What did though was that Umar Gul and Mohammad Aamer put on 62 runs for the 9th wicket in only 43 deliveries!

Come to think of it, it was a match for the tails.

Both Sri Lanka's and Pakistan's last 4 wickets added 101 runs to the total.

When are the batsmen from both sides going to put their hands up to be counted?

It is high time!

For the batsmen to fire and for England to somehow get this series on TV!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Flying Start in England

I landed in London this morning and as I stepped out of Heathrow, I was greeted by rain.

It took me over an hour to get to where I was supposed to; when I got there I found out that the morning session of the 3rd Ashes test had also been greeted by rain.

I waited all afternoon for play to start; when it finally did, I was shocked.

I was shocked to see the news that Phil Hughes dropped from the side!

Hughes had a dream debut series against South Africa and after just two below par performances in this Ashes series, he finds himself dropped.

I never thought that the Australian team could act like the Pakistan one who have hardly shown patience with their openers in recent times.

Having said that, Australia got off to a great start courtesy Shane Watson and Simon Katich.

Maybe Hughes would not have provided a similar start but I still don't think he deserved to be dropped.

His replacement however, Watson, was impressive. He played a few lovely strokes. Katich's cameo was a surprise though; I have never seen him play so aggressively. In test cricket atleast.

Australia are off to a flying start in this 3rd test; while I am too with my first day in the UK giving me a taste of both the rain and the bright sunshine.

It is amazing how quickly the weather changes within minutes here. Almost as quickly as Pakistan's cricketers change shades!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Thursday, July 30, 2009

Keep this person in your thoughts

A club cricketer here in the US is fighting for his life after being hit by lightning. Apparently this was his first game for his club. Hope he makes it through.
Patrick Gibson, 41, was barely breathing and his legs were badly burned after the Marine Park lightning strike, witnesses said.

"His pants were burned. His tongue was out of his mouth and his eyes were rolled back in his head," said Kenneth Charles, 38.

Gibson was playing in his first game for the Brooklyn-based Stars United team when the wild weather chased players off the field at Avenue S and E. 32nd St. just after 4 p.m.

Friends said the Brooklyn man had lagged behind the group to collect equipment when he was hit.

"It started raining. The thunder cracked, and he just fell," said witness Dominic Audain, 22, a cricket player on the opposing team, Middlesex Cricket Country Club.

"I thought he was stunned or shocked," Audain said. "Ten seconds passed and he wasn't moving. That's when we ran over."


More at: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2009/07/26/2009-07-26_cricket_player_struck_by_lightning.html

Please keep him in your thoughts. And, most importantly, please get indoors the moment you see lightning/storms approaching. Take no liberty with nature's fury.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Shahid Afridi to Lead Pakistan

This 2009 has been some rollercoaster of a year! For me as well as for the Pakistan cricket team.

I'll save my personal ride for some other time; Pakistan's ride has been nothing short of dramatic.

Captaincy change, a first home test series in 17 months, an attack on a visiting cricket team, an ODI series against Australia for the first time in half a decade, return of the ICL rebels, a World Cup win, retirements, a first test tour in 17 months, sensational debuts, unexplainable collapses, and what not.

Pakistan cricket has gone through a lot.

During this time, we at Well Pitched have been around riding this roller coaster with them.

Today as I get ready to shift base from the UAE to the UK, I leave with the news that Shahid Afridi has been announced captain of Pakistan's Twenty20 team.

How awesome is that!

Since the day Well Pitched came online about 2 years ago, I have been writing about two key things that I want to see happen.

One was the permanent inclusion of Fawad Alam in the Pakistan XI in all forms of the game.

The second was the elevation of Shahid Afridi to the position of Pakistan captain.

2009 has seen both those wishes come true.

Couldn't have asked for more, could I?

What's best is that this is just the beginning for Fawad Alam and Shahid Afridi the captain!

Surely better and bigger things are yet to come!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Pakistan Have a Selection Problem

And for once, it is a good one!

The problem I'm talking about is the one regarding the selection of the playing XI for the upcoming ODIs against Sri Lanka.

With the return of the ICL rebels into the international fold, Pakistan's 16 man squad looks very strong on paper.

I believe the squad provides Younis Khan with a lot of options; he and the team management have a lot of thinking to do.

Who is going to open?

Will it be the specialists, Imran Nazir and Nasir Jamshed? Will it be Kamran Akmal who had a great impact in the position during the World T20? Or will Fawad Alam continue in his new found role?

If Fawad Alam does not open, does he have a spot in the XI?

With Yousuf's return, the middle order seems packed with him, Younis, Misbah, Malik, Afridi, Akmal, Razzaq; will Fawad continue to be ignored?

Where will Shahid Afridi bat?

Will he continue in the lower order where he has batted in ODIs for the last 3 years? Will he be used as a floater? Or will he come up the order where he rediscovered his batting form during the World T20?

How will Mohammad Yousuf fit back into the ODI team?

With Yousuf out, Pakistan had the luxury to play with 6 bowling options; with Yousuf back, will they revert to using Malik as the 5th bowler? Or will Misbah or Malik make way for Yousuf?

How will Abdul Razzaq fit into the ODI XI?

Razzaq has not played an ODI for over two years now; does he still have a place in the team? If specialist openers are used with Malik, Afridi, and Akmal in the lower order then where does Razzaq fit in?

There are just some of the questions that Younis Khan and Co. should be looking to answer.

They better be thinking about it.

I surely am and I have still not been able to figure out what the best XI should be.

I always prefer to have 6 bowling options in ODIs; 5 is too big a risk in my view.

At the same time, I am extremely excited about watching a potentially explosive opening pair in Imran Nazir & Nasir Jamshed.

However, if that happens it would leave only 5 bowling options considering that Younis, Yousuf, Misbah, Malik, Afridi, and Akmal are almost garanteed a spot in the XI.

Unless Younis considers himself as the 6th option, which he should going by the way he bowled in the tests.

Given that, who fills in the final 3 spots?

3 pacers? Or Saeed Ajmal and 2 pacers? If Ajmal plays then does Razzaq still make the team as the 2nd pacer?

See the problem I'm talking about. I think it has been a while since Pakistan faced so many options with the selection of an XI.

This is the XI I would look to play.

Q's XI: 1. Imran Nazir 2. Nasir Jamshed 3. Shahid Afridi 4. Younis Khan 5. Shoaib Malik 6. Fawad Alam 7. Abdul Razzaq 8. Kamran Akmal 9. Umar Gul 10. Mohammad Aamer 11. Saeed Ajmal.

Though I don't think that will happen. There is no way Younis Khan will drop Yousuf and / or Misbah.

I believe he should.

Which XI will you play?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, July 23, 2009

Open Letter to Pakistan's Selectors

Dear Selectors,

It has been brought to my notice that you have announced the Pakistan squad for the ODIs against Sri Lanka.

As always, you have surprised me; both pleasantly as well as otherwise.

Firstly, I would like to congratulate you on finally putting Salman Butt out of his misery. You have done yourselves proud and I am sure that the entire country is unanimously happy with this decision of yours.

Even moreso because this brings Imran Nazir back into the fold!

We all just love him, don't we?

Although I feel that he is more of a T20 batsman, but anyone instead of Salman Butt is a welcome change.

You have also done well in maintaining your faith in Nasir Jamshed.

I understand that it is not your fault that he has had several injury problems in recent times; it is clear to me that he is your first choice ODI opener and I am glad to see this continuity.

But where is Ahmed Shehzad?

He had a good debut ODI series against Australia and now he is off the radar and doesn't even find himself a place as a reserve opener?

Why?

But coming back to the good things, I was pleased to see Umar Akmal's name in the 16-man squad that you announced.

That really made me feel good.

I had been talking about Umar's outstanding performances for Pakistan A during their tour to Australia; I had also mentioned that his inclusion in the Pakistan team was not far off.

This time you exceeded my expectations by inducting him in the senior side so quickly.

Great work!

But then where you guys display great decisions, you also display some strange ones.

Why is Rana Naveed back in the team?

When he was dropped two years ago he was clearly out of form and not even close to the kind of bowler he was during that India tour in 2005-06.

His bowling had become wayward, he had lost his swing, he had lost his hair, and he looked more like a club bowler.

So what has changed since then? Why are we going back to him?

Where is Sohail Tanvir? Where is Sohail Khan? Where is Mohammad Talha? Where is Anwar Ali?

Why didn't you guys look to blood a promising, young, upcoming fast bowler instead of Rana?

Overall, however, I believe you have given Younis Khan a very good squad. It is up to him now to find the best XI and take them on to the field.

I feel it will be a difficult task chosing an XI from the squad, but that is something for another post.

Yours Faithfully,

Q.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Shane Watson to Open?

The Australians cannot be serious!

I read this and then wondered how it could even be an option.

And its not only Shane Watson who is willing to open; apparently Tim Nielsen is backing him to do so as well.

Why?

Phil Hughes has scores of 36, 4, and 17 in this Ashes series so far.

Is that all it took for the Aussies to contemplate dropping the man who was going to be their run scoring machine this summer?

Has Hughes' awesome debut in South Africa already been forgotten?

Michael Hussey has been failing repeatedly; why don't they replace him with Shane Watson?

Surely a batting order that reads Michael Clarke at 4, Marcus North at 5, and Shane Watson at 6 makes more sense if Watson is to come into the team that is.

I have no issues with Watson coming into the XI; but I have a problem deciphering how anyone could think of dropping Phil Hughes.

Not that Hughes is indispensible, but already?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Doing an Ijaz Ahmed

If this was Galle or Colombo, from 67-4 Pakistan would have folded for 120.

Or maybe 94.

Wait. This was Colombo. But it wasn't the P Sara.

At the SSC, Pakistan recovered from a self-destructing position of 67-4 to post 300-5 at the end of the day.

So what happened then? Why did Pakistan not collapse?

Ijaz Ahmed happened!

Despite being a talented batsman, Ijaz was known to hit a century in the last match of every series after failing in all the matches preceding that.

Every series, whether ODI or test, would have the same pattern for Ijaz. He would fail in every innings and then when the last match would come around and it would be his last chance, he would come out with a knock that would keep him in the team for the next series.

Shoaib Malik, and to some extent Misbah and Kamran Akmal, did an Ijaz Ahmed today.

All 3 were heavily criticized for their performances in the first two tests.

Many even claimed that this was probably the last chance for both Malik and Misbah.

But today they rose to the occasion.

They got Pakistan out of a precarious situation, they grinded their way through the day, they did not look ordinary, the footwork was there, even the new ball was countered, they denied Pakistan another collapse, and they have almost ensured Pakistan a face-saving victory.

So then, what does Pakistan do now?

Do they still leave them out of the test team in the future or do they let them off the hook, like Ijaz Ahmed, and allow them to fail again for a series till the last match comes around?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Unbelievable!

I've been running around but I've caught some cricket in between; I caught England's 75-year-misery-wiping-out win at Lord's and also some of the action from the 3rd test between Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

Here's some stuff that I found quite difficult to believe.

  1. England's win at Lord's.

  2. Michael Clarke's century, which came with hardly any runs on the board. Was that a first?

  3. Andrew Flintoff's 5-for. I know he is good; I did not think he still had it in him. Awesome display!

  4. Stuart Broad going for under 4 an over.

  5. Graeme Swann picking his first wicket of the series on Day 9.

  6. Pakistan losing their last 8 wickets for 96 runs. Well not unbelievable really but after 3 collapses they surely should have been more wary.

  7. A batsman shouldering arms to Younis Khan and getting bowled. Just brilliant!

  8. Danish Kaneria looking threatening. Is it really him or is it just the Sri Lankans?

  9. The number of bad umpiring decisions in both these tests; where is the review system?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Monday, July 20, 2009

Is the ICC waking up?

The 8 best teams in the world.

2 groups of 4 teams each.

Top 2 in each group go to semis.

2 weeks total.

That's the format of the Champions Trophy, and it rocks! This is what an ODI tournament should be all about. Short, simple, sweet, and to-the-point.

The Champions Trophy is certainly an endangered tournament. But a good, short tournament will ensure it stays. I think it's a good addition to the calendar in this form. Two weeks every two years is not a bad deal at all.

Between the T20 and a revamped Champions Trophy, is the ICC actually waking up? Now all they have to do is revamp the World Cup to make it shorter and more meaningful. No hope for any changes in 2011, but perhaps beyond that.

And if you are wondering about the groups, they are:

Group A: Pakistan, India, Australia, West Indies.
Group B: South Africa, Sri Lanka, England, New Zealand.

No way to predict anything because all teams are strong...that's the way it should be.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Will Pakistan's Drought End?

10 Tests, 30 months.

That is how long it has been since Pakistan has won a test match.

I don't think that I have ever waited longer than this in my lifetime for Pakistan to win a test match.

I'm not sure but maybe this is also the longest drought in Pakistan's test cricket history.

And I believe its about time Pakistan bloody well ends it!

Out of the 7 days of cricket played during this test series against Sri Lanka, Pakistan have had the upper hand on 4.

In a few hours, if they can do that continiously for a few days, they will manage to close and end this prolonged period of no test wins.

Sri Lanka will not be easy though.

Their batsmen will be looking to put in better performances; Chaminda Vaas, in his last test, will want to go out on a high; and the entire team would want to give a fitting farewell to Vaas.

The Lankans are not going to be complacent. They want a sweep.

Pakistan, on the other hand, will have to rise to the occasion.

Can they do it or will we witness yet another collapse?

If you take a look at their last 3 innings they have managed 8-46, 10-90, and 9-35.

They surely can't do worse than this!

If they do then Pakistan will experience their first ever clean sweep at the hands of any team that is not Australia or South Africa.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Sunday, July 19, 2009

Ashes Day 10: How is it Going to Pan Out?

Remember this?

Pakistan ended day 4 with only 53 runs ahead and only 4 wickets in hand.

On day 5, they not only added another 240 runs, they also declared their innings to have a crack at India for 20 overs.

Remember this?

South Africa ended day 4 with another 187 runs to get with 7 wickets in hand.

On day 5, they lost only 1 wicket and got to the target.

So then.

Do you see any reason why Australia can't get another 209 runs tomorrow?

Do you see any reason why Michael Clarke and Brad Haddin can't continue in the same vein?

Do you see any reason why Mitchell Johnson can't join them to see Australia to the target?

Unless you are an optimistic Australian or a pessismistic English person, your answer should be yes.

I am neither, yet my answer is not that.

75 years of misery is way too long a time to wipe out in a matter of 5 days.

Every English fan will be thinking that; every England cricketer will be thinking that.

Boy aren't we lucky we are not in their shoes.

Can you even begin to imagine what they will go through if Australia manage to chase 522?

I can't. I don't want to.

The two largest chases in test cricket have come against Australia; maybe it is time Australia sets that record straight!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Well Pitched is Moving

It is not really; Well Pitched is staying right here.

It is I who is moving.

I am currently counting down my last 10 days in Dubai & Abu Dhabi (home for the last 26 years), before I move to the UK for the next two years, or maybe longer.

Manchester to be exact.

Old Trafford, here I come!

Manchester Business School may not be happy to hear that but I guess I'll be found more at Old Trafford than at MBS.

This move could not have come at a better time considering that I am shifting to a country that the Pakistan cricket team is going to call home for the next few years.

The timing is just apt.

I fly out in 10 days from Dubai for a week's visit to London and a 10-day trip to the US; before I reach Manchester around mid-August and settle in.

Why am I telling you all this?

Well just to let you know why there may be a lack of activity on Well Pitched during this time.

Although the glassy post on Pakistan cricket generated a lot of buzz, I have posted only once since then in the last 4 days and have hardly commented on any other blog, which is very unlike me.

I've been pressed for time taking care of things before my move; the next 10 days will be even more hectic. Plus, while travelling it might get difficult to keep up with all the cricket, write about it, and comment.

That in no way means that Well Pitched will not continue to roll. It will and I will be writing; maybe just not as often.

Regular service should resume once I am in Manchester in about a month, unless the MBA starts taking a toll on me.

I doubt that though for you can take me away from the cricket, you can't really take the cricket away from me!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Saturday, July 18, 2009

Ashes Days 6 & 7: What the Hell Happened?

I snoozed off without any cricket for the weekend in Dubai for a few farewell parties and I come back to see England leading by over 300 runs with 8 wickets in hand!

What the hell happened?

To say I was surprised to see the scorecard would be an understatement.

From what I looked at initially, this is what went through my mind:

  1. Andrew Strauss, another 100, what a year he is having.

  2. England got only 425 despite the openers putting on almost 200; I'm telling you they need a batsman at 6 and Prior at 7. No Flintoff.

  3. What were the Aussies doing getting bowled out for 215? Looks like Anderson was swinging it and they also got their first taste of Onions in England.

  4. I have no idea how Stuart Broad managed 2 wickets; he still went over 4 an over, which is shit!

  5. Why didn't England enforce the follow on?

  6. Shocking that the Aussie pacers could not bounce back in the 2nd innings, particularly after what Anderson and Onions did.

  7. Looks like England is going to wipe out 75 years of misery at Lord's!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Is the Glass Half Full or Half Empty?

For me it is always Half Full.

I am generally an optimist; one who always thinks about the positives rather than one who dwells on the negatives.

There have been varied reactions to Pakistan's test series loss to Sri Lanka, but one reaction, which has come from several quarters, is the one regarding the different factions within the team.

Former players have spoken about it, a former captain has voiced his concern regarding it, a former chief selector who recently resigned has made his views public regarding the factions, and a few bloggers also feel the same way.

I believe all of this talk regarding factions is a load of bullshit.

I also believe that the people talking about these factions are those who consider the glass half empty.

They need a reason to point fingers at the players that failed, they need excuses for the defeat, they need someone to be held responsible for the manner in which Pakistan collapsed.

Why I ask.

Why do you need to point fingers at anyone? Why do you need excuses for the pathetic batting display that Pakistan put up?

It was a collective team failure, a failure to counter the swing of the new ball, a failure to play left arm spinners, a failure to play well under pressure.

It is as simple as that; and it is nothing new.

These problems relating to batting collapses, succumbing to the swinging ball, and looking clueless against left arm spinners have plagued Pakistan for as long as I have watched cricket.

There is nothing new about this.

I am not denying the fact that Pakistan are 2-0 down in a series, in which they could have easily been 2-0 up.

The fact that they are not is only due to them; them as a whole team and not due to certain individuals or factions.

Moving on, why dwell on these negatives?

Instead of talking about the atrocious shot that Younis Khan played to get out, why not talk about the captain's knock he played, the record partnership that he was involved in, the good position that he got Pakistan to?

Instead of talking about the factions and giving excuses for a bad performance why not talk about the great comeback of Mohammad Yousuf.

Or the awesome debut of Fawad Alam.

Or the launch of the promising test career of Mohammad Aamer.

Or the effort of Saeed Ajmal in the two tests.

Or the effort that Umar Gul put in on the 2nd day at Colombo.

There are plenty of positives to be taken, despite the sorry defeats.

There is no reason to think that the team is divided and not united.

Are you telling me that Misbah was not responsible enough when he got out to a bad decision? That ball was missing leg stump by some distance.

Are you telling me that Shoaib Malik under performed because a straighter one sneaked through the smallest of gaps between bat and pad and just kissed the bail?

I am not saying that Misbah and Malik did well; they have been far from their best in this series, but it is still not reason enough to think that they are conspiring against Younis Khan.

There are no divisions within the team.

The team as a whole failed at Galle, the team as a whole failed at Colombo.

It wasn't due to the bad performance of a few individuals. It was due to the bad performance of the team!

Younis Khan is right in asking for time with the team and all of us should be doing just that rather than pointing fingers.

Pakistan has hardly been playing test cricket and this series is just the start of a long 12 months, during which they will play as many as 11 more tests after the 3rd one against Sri Lanka.

All those 11 tests will be played away from home, in New Zealand, in Australia, and in England.

Those are tough conditions to play in and Pakistan requires experienced players to be at their best to take on those sides.

This is not the time for wholesale changes.

It is the time to back the experienced players, it is time to be a bit more patient, it is time to stop looking for excuses every time the team performs below potential, it is time to accept that we were beaten because we lacked the skill and the aptitude, and not due to some imaginary factions in the team!

I understand that it is not easy being a Pakistan fan. The team puts us through varying emotions without blinking an eye.

It frustrates us, it makes us curse and abuse, it makes us proud, it fails us, it makes us cheer, it makes us sad, it makes us jump up with joy, it makes us break the TV screen, it makes us angry, it makes us smile, it makes us party like one crazy nation, it makes us pull our hair out, it makes us panic, it builds our expectations and then dampens them, it makes us...

Even a Bollywood movie does not dish out so much drama.

But would you have it any other way?

I surely wouldn't!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


England's Shoaib Akhtar

That is who Andrew Flintoff was.

Hindered by bad knees, broken ankles, and disciplinary problems, Flintoff never really lived up to his potential; much like Shoaib Akhtar.

Both Flintoff and Shoaib started their test careers around the same time; 12 years later both find themselves at the end of the road with unfulfilled goals; not due to a lack of ability but due to a lack of determination and drive.

I'm not saying that either cricketer did not have the determination to do well for their country; they just didn't have it in them to remain motivated for a sustained period of time.

Managing one's body is as much a part of a cricketer's career as working on one's batting and bowling.

Like Shoaib, Flintoff never really did that.

The late night drinking and partying, turning up drunk at practice sessions, drinking through pain; Flintoff never really changed his ways despite several warnings. Much like Shoaib.

He was one hell of a cricketer no doubt, but with a bowling average higher than his batting one in tests shows how Flintoff has not lived up to the tremendous potential he had.

He did manage to play 30 more tests than Shoaib Akhtar did during the last 12 years, but that's because of the higher number of tests England plays.

If you take a look at the number of tests both players missed during this time, it is about the same.

Flintoff really starred in only one series; the 2005 Ashes.

Besides that, he never really won matches or series for England on a consistent basis.

I feel Flintoff has let England down more often than he has helped them win; not through his mediocre performances but because of his indiscipline and injuries. A lot like Shoaib Akhtar.

I hardly remember a series that he played in full; again much like Shoaib Akhtar.

I hardly remember a tour in which Flintoff's indiscipline did not come to notice; again much like Shoaib Akhtar.

One area however, where Flintoff differs from Shoaib Akhtar, besides the genital warts, is that the realization of "enough is enough" has finally dawned on him.

The realization that the injuries are getting out of hand, the realization that he can no longer give his best for England in test cricket, the realization that it is time to go.

And hence comes Flintoff's announcement to retire from test cricket after the Ashes.

I believe Shoaib Akhtar should take a cue from this and do the same.

With the end of Flintoff, comes the end of yet another test career. Not a great career, however, but one that had the potential to be.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


The Cardiff Spill-Over & the Lord's Record

The drama following the Cardiff test has hardly subsided and the next Ashes test is already upon us!

A lot has been said following England's last wicket heroics at Cardiff; there have been pot shots taken, players have reacted, former players have reacted, the media has reacted, retirements have been announced, former coaches have spoken, captains have spoken, bloggers have written, and what not.

All this and all of them missed out on a dramatic Colombo affair.

Before I move on to Lord's, I just want to add my two-bits to the spill-over from Cardiff.

  1. England played out of their skins to draw a test and it got all of England raving about a sensational performance. Their best is past them now, it is going to be all down hill from here.
  2. Ricky Ponting is the last person in this world who should be talking about "playing cricket in the right spirit".
  3. Anything and everything spoken for and against Kevin Pietersen is a load of crap. He plays for his team, he is a great batsman, he looks ugly when he scores, hence he looks ugly when he gets out.
  4. You tell him Duncan Fletcher! What do you mean he is irrelevant Ricky? He is probably the most important English person related to cricket this decade.
  5. I wonder what Ricky feels about Nathan Hauritz statement, where he says that "Australia would have done the same".
  6. I also wonder why Ricky thinks that Flintoff's retirement announcement will make England lose focus. Weren't the 2006 Ashes a farewell series for McGrath, Langer, and Warney?

Coming back to Lord's and the rest of the Ashes series.

Focused or not, I don't think it makes much of a difference to England's chances in the 2009 Ashes.

As I said before the series, I don't think they are going to win anything.

Not till they continue to persist with Stuart Broad. What good is he anyway?

I actually feel that had Flintoff announced his retirement with immediate effect, it would have been better for England.

Flintoff doesn't cut it any more as the 6th batsman and 3rd pacer in the side.

A specialist batsman at 6, coupled with three pacers, none of whom are Flintoff or Broad, will actually give England more balance and strength in my opinion.

But with this being Flintoff's farewell test series, that is not going to happen now, is it?

A lot is being said about Australia's and England's history at Lord's. 75 years since England beat Australia there?

Well even if England had beaten Australia every single time in the last 75 years at Lord's, even then they would not have stood a chance to win the 2nd Ashes test that starts tomorrow.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 14, 2009

What Would You Like to be Remembered As?

Most famous people are asked that question at least once in their lifetime.

Almost every interviewer has that question up their sleeve for the celebrities.

You must have read a number of different answers to that question, such as:

"I would like to be remembered as the most talented actor in India."

"I would like to be remembered as an entertainer."

"I would like to be remembered as an actress and not just a sex symbol."

"I would like to be remembered as a man who served his country to the best of his abilities."

"I would like to be remembered as the fastest bowler in the world."

"I would like to be remembered as the best opener to play for Australia."

"I would like to be remembered as the next Imran Khan."

"I would like to be remembered as a cricketer who always gave his 200%."

But one thing that I am sure you would have never heard before is:

"I would like them to remember me as the craziest cricketer that ever played for Pakistan."

Now who would like to leave a legacy like that?

None other than the one and only Shahid Afridi!

Trust him to go against the norm and come up with something like that.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


10 LBWs

10 Pakistani batsmen fell to an LBW decision in two innings in the just concluded test match.

In comparison, only 2 Sri Lankan batsmen lost their wickets in that manner.

There's something wrong there.

Not with the umpires, with the Pakistani batsmen!

Did they forget to use their bats? Did they forget to move their legs out of the way?

Whatever it is, it needs to be sorted out soon enough.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Sri Lanka Make History

Saying that Pakistan had the liberty to bat all day definitely did not mean that they had the ability to do so.

Well I would think that they had the ability too but these dramatic collapses of "Pakistani Proportions" are becoming all too regular now.

Just when you thought they couldn't get worse, we saw their worst collapse ever, and their third one in as many innings.

The new ball did the trick for Sri Lanka again as Pakistan's batsmen were found wanting against the swing of Nuwan Kulasekara.

Mohammad Yousuf was yet again undone by Rangana Herath, who for the second time downed Pakistan in the second innings.

Besides Fawad Alam's amazing effort coupled with Younis Khan's support, no Pakistani batsman was up for the challenge.

They folded meekly and left Sri Lanka with an easy target to chase.

The bowlers could have made it more competitive but Warnapura and then the experienced King Sanga and Jayawardene just took the game away.

It is a historic victory for Sri Lanka as it completes a first ever series win for them over Pakistan at home.

They had not beaten Pakistan in a test at home since 1986 and they had never won a test series against them at home ever; within 7 days of cricket they have completely turned those facts upside down!

As for Pakistan; a lot of thinking to do. Maybe later. For now, let the Sri Lankans rejoice.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


An Un-Colombo Morning

Unlike the first two mornings at Colombo, which saw a total of 11 wickets fall, this morning we witnessed the batsmen pile on the runs with utmost ease.

I guess Fawad Alam and Younis Khan slept soundly last night!

Both, Fawad and Younis, looked very comfortable at the crease and the runs flowed for Pakistan, stretching their lead from an overnight 28 to 144.

The best thing about Fawad's innings is that he has scored at a very good pace, yet he has hardly played any big shots.

It would be ironic to say that his runs have come unnoticed, but that is the way he has played.

Fawad has given the Sri Lankan bowlers a slow death and they are probably still wondering what hit them.

Younis was a bit more aggressive this morning; he missed out on a well deserved century and would have got there had he not tried to reverse sweep a rank full toss.

It was not a delivery that should have got a wicket but then something had to go Sri Lanka's way.

Pakistan is now in a very good position and they can convert this lead into a match winning one if they continue in the same vein.

I'm not sure what would be a match winning total here as the wicket is playing very well and Sri Lanka have chased 350+ on this ground before.

However, going by the way Sri Lanka have batted in this series, I would be confident if they are set a total over 300.

Having said that, Pakistan should look to bat out the day and take the match away from Sri Lanka.

They have the liberty to do so.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Bangladesh's 2nd Test Victory; Historic?

Cricinfo has termed Bangladesh's test win over the West Indies as "historic".

Is it really?

To be honest I expected this Bangladesh win as soon as I heard that West Indies will be fielding a second string side; it hasn't come as a surprise or a shock to me.

It is only their second test victory ever, with the previous one coming against Zimbabwe over 4 years ago.

9 years, 60 test matches, 2 wins, not good!

Only a fool will think that Bangladesh has made progress with this win.

Sure its a great win for them; but it needs to be looked at in perspective.

If it wasn't for the WICB, WIPA, and a contractual dispute, Bangladesh would not have had this win.

The West Indies handed it to them on a platter and Bangladesh did well not to lose it.

Besides Tamim Iqbal's century and a solid knock from Junaid Siddique there weren't any notable batting performances.

The spinners looked good but only because they were up against a side that looked more like a cricket club than an international team.

The win is good for their confidence no doubt, but I'm afraid I don't think it is historic.

Bangladesh still have a lot more to do to make me believe that they can compete at this level.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Monday, July 13, 2009

Fawad Alam Makes me Proud

I don't have to tell you that I have been talking about Fawad Alam for two years now.

You all know how much I have written about him; how much I have called for him to be included in the Pakistan XI; how much I have rated him.

I was surprised to see some people question what Fawad Alam had done to demand a place in the Pakistan XI.

Well for those who follow Pakistan's domestic cricket and Pakistan A team tours know that Fawad Alam has been the best batsman in the country for about 3-4 years now.

He first caught my eye when he was the leading scorer in a domestic 20-20 tournament in 2005-06.

Since then, Fawad made strong waves in all formats of the game; 20-20, List A, and First-Class; one doesn't muster up a first-class average of 57 by being mediocre.

Throughout this time, I never thought he demanded a place in the XI. I thought he commanded one!

All that is in the past now, for Fawad Alam has just become the 10th batsman in Pakistan's history to hit a century on test debut.

He makes his way into an elite list, which includes Pakistani greats such as Khalid Ibadullah, Javed Miandad, Saleem Malik, and Younis Khan.

On top, Fawad became the first Pakistani to hit a century on test debut away from Pakistan.

He played a chanceless knock in a pressure situation and in a game in which Pakistan looked down and out almost as soon as it began.

Fawad may not be the most gifted stroke player nor the most technically correct batsman, but he is a fighter who grinds his way through situations as was apparent in his innings today.

He is not a big hitter of the ball but he still scores his runs at a fairly decent pace, mostly through his nudges into the gaps and running between the wicket.

Umar Gul and Saeed Ajmal brought Pakistan back into this second test against Sri lanka; but if Pakistan go on to win this match, it will be because of the lead they muster up on the back of Fawad's innings.

His job is not over yet, but he has done me proud. I'm sure he has done a lot of others proud too.

This century may lead a number of people to speak Fawad up as the solution to the opening problem; though I am not sure about that.

This is the first time in his entire career that Fawad has opened in any form of the game.

He has made the most of the opportunity given to him and Pakistan have definitely found a great batsman; a great opener or not, only time will tell.

I still think Pakistan needs to find specialist openers and fit Fawad into the middle order where he has spent his career so far.

That's a thought for later; for now lets savour this brilliant innings from Fawad Alam.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


The Colombo Mornings

There's something about the mornings in Colombo.

Pakistan lost 6 wickets in the morning session yesterday; Sri Lanka lost 5 today.

Are the batsmen not getting proper sleep?

Yesterday morning was just a poor execution of batting skills against a new swinging red cherry.

This morning, however, the Sri Lankans were outsmarted by a rejuvenated Umar Gul.

After a lacklustre performance in the first test, Gul completely redeemed himself this morning with a top performance that got him 3 wickets, including the all important one of King Sanga.

Saeed Ajmal bowled non-stop during this session, and bowled well; it surprised me though that Mohammad Aamer was given only 4 overs this morning.

Aamer should have had a couple of wickets; if only Khurram had safer hands and some other edges had flown to the fielders, but I believe Younis should have bowled him more.

But then with 5 wickets, Pakistan has done well and somewhat brought themselves back into this game so I wouldn't argue against Younis Khan's tactics.

History would tell you that 150 would be a more than enough lead for Sri Lanka, but NC has different ideas.

A good Colombo morning for the Pakistanis after the nightmare yesterday.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


A Season for Debutants?

I was randomly thinking about it and then looked it up.

Starting from May 2008 (New Zealand's tour of England and the Australia's tour of West Indies) upto and including the ongoing test matches, here is a list of test debutants.

Sri Lanka:
Ajantha Mendis, Dammika Prasad, Tharanga Paranavitana, Angelo Mathews

Australia: Brad Haddin, Beau Casson, Cameron White, Peter Siddle, Jason Krejza, Doug Bollinger, Andrew Mcdonald, Ben Hilfenhaus, Phil Hughes, Marcus North, Bryce McGain

Bangladesh: Naeem Islam, Mahbubul Alam, Imrul Kayes, Raqibul Hasan, Rubel Hossain, Mahmuddullah

New Zealand: Daniel Flynn, Aaron Redmond, Gareth Hopkins, Jesse Ryder, Tim McIntosh, Martin Guptill

India: Amit Mishra, Murali Vijay

West Indies: Amit Jaggernauth, Llionel Baker, Brendan Nash, Llendl Simmons, Dale Richards, Omar Phillips, Ryan Austin, Travis Dowlin, Chadwick Walton, Kemar Roach, Nikita Miller

England: Darren Pattinson, Graeme Swann, Amjad Khan, Tim Bresnan, Graham Onions

South Africa: JP Duminy, Imraan Khan, Albie Morkel

Pakistan: Khurram Manzoor, Sohail Khan, Mohammad Talha, Mohammad Aamer, Abdur Rauf, Saeed Ajmal, Fawad Alam

That is an extraordinary number of test debutants!

And only the West Indies faced absurd circumstances that resulted in 7 debutants in their ongoing test against Bangladesh.

All the others are for genuine cricketing reasons, if you know what I mean.

I'm not sure if there has been another period in test cricket that has witnessed so many debuts.

There might be, but this to me looks like probably one of the largest number for 3 cricket seasons - 2008, 2008-09, and 2009 as defined on Cricinfo.

So what is it? Is a test cap easier to achieve these days? Or are several teams going through a rebuilding phase? Or have there been too many injuries? Or the boards are just feeling generous?

55 debutants in 15 months of test cricket; I can count only 20 out of them who are or will be regulars for their test teams.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Sunday, July 12, 2009

Ashes Day 5: Two-Bits

I was expecting an innings win for Australia but Paul Collingwood lived to do what he claimed he would - bat out the game for England.

Australia could not close what really should have been their game, especially after they ran through England's middle order and had them at 127-6.

It was quite unbelievable really, particularly when Monty Panesar came out to bat and went back unbeaten.

Here are my two-bits from Day 5:

  1. Graeme Swann was supposed to be the biggest threat to Australia but he failed to pick up a single wicket; his unbeaten 47 and 31 though probably saved the game for England.

  2. James Anderson managed his 2nd and 3rd highest test score in this match; quite a game to do it in.

  3. Nathan Hauritz with figures of 6-158 surprised me; what shocked me is that he did a lot better than Swann.

  4. There was talk before the Ashes that the batting from the tails will probably decide the series. Australia's tail did not get a chance in this match; England's last 4 wickets, on the other hand, added 108 runs in the 1st innings and an unbroken 125 runs in the 2nd.

    I'm not sure whether that says more about England's tail or Australia's bowling.

  5. Ben Hilfenhaus is a bowler and a half; I don't see Lee or Clark playing a single game this Ashes.

  6. Mike Hussey was the only batsman in this match who did not manage to hit a boundary; even Monty managed to hit one!

  7. Why was Mitchell Johnson not bowled near the end of the England's innings? Was Ponting trying to save some money again by handing the ball to North?

  8. This was the first first Ashes Test this decade that ended in anything but an Australian victory. The last time this happened, it was Brisbane and it was 1998.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Oh Pakistan!

I expected a lot of things from Pakistan's 2nd test match against Sri Lanka, but I did not expect any of this:

  1. Pakistan bowled out below 100 for the 10th time in their test history.
  2. Pakistan bowled out for their 7th lowest test score ever.
  3. Pakistan bowled out for their lowest ever test score against Sri Lanka!
In fact Pakistan's 117 in the 4th innings of the Galle test was their lowest ever test score against Sri Lanka; it has taken them less than a week to wipe out that record.

Twice in this series; two of their lowest ever scores.

Can it get any worse for Pakistan?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


A New Cricket Application in Town

How many of you own an iPhone or an iPod touch?

For those that do, this is for you; for those who don't you may buy one just for this.

Virtual Cricket is a new cricket application specifically developed for the iPhone and the iPod touch; and its review tells me that it is the best cricket application around.

The application not only allows one to follow the scores of LIVE cricket matches, it provides for ball-by-ball commentary, full scorecards, player and team graphs, and a wide range of statistics.

The best part about it is that it also provides a newsfeed of the latest news, articles, and opinions on cricket on the web; not only from leading cricket websites such as Cricinfo, but also from cricket blogs.

From what I hear, it is the best cricket application developed thus far integrating all the features of other applications and also utilizing iPhone options to make it an enhanced experience for the users.

Try it for yourself to see what it is all about; if you would like to, follow the banner on the right to the iTune store.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


What are they doing with Fawad Alam!?

I cannot believe what I am watching!

Fawad Alam making his test debut for Pakistan and opening the innings!

What is Pakistan doing?

Are they hell bent on destroying one of the most promising careers that has not even got going yet?

Fawad Alam has been the best batsman in Pakistan's domestic circuit for close to 4-5 years now, but he IS NOT an opener!

I am more than pleased to see him make his test debut considering that I have been writing about him for close to two years now.

But I am not happy to see him open.

He has never opened in his life! Not in domestic cricket, not for the U-19 side, not for any side!

For Pakistan to throw him at the deep end in his very 1st test match goes to show the lack of planning, and a lack of a whole lot of other things, within the team management.

Fawad might go on and do well as opener, but if he fails, it will be a major major blunder on part of the selectors and the team management.

Even if he does well, does it garantee him the opening spot? It should not; there should be specialist openers and Fawad should be batting in the middle order!

First the selectors don't select a reserve opener in the squad. Then when the team management decides to drop an out-of-form-one out of the XI, they throw a debutant, who has never opened in his life before, at the deep end of things.

What happened to Shoaib Malik and Kamran Akmal who have opened before?

It is just as if Pakistan doesn't want to give Fawad a proper chance to succeed at international level.

In ODIs and T20Is they bat him at 7 or 8, which hardly gives him a chance to bat; in a test match they ask him to open, which is one of the most difficult tasks in the game.

Just give him his position at number 5 or 6!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Pakistan and Sri Lanka Ready for yet another Clash

In just about 4 hours Pakistan and Sri Lanka will take the field again for the 2nd test match of their series.

The 1st test last week set the tone for a fast paced, action packed series between the two; if the initial reports coming in regarding the nature of the pitch are true, then this morning will see yet another exciting test match kick off.

After Pakistan's dramatic collapse on the 4th morning of the previous test, there were a number of reactions from various quarters.

Shoaib Malik and Salman Butt received a lot of criticism, Fawad Alam's exclusion raised eye brows, while some even questioned the omission of Abdul Razzaq and Danish Kaneria.

Personally, I don't think there was anything wrong with the XI that Pakistan fielded in the 1st test.

They dominated the test for 3 days, before collapsing in a heap.

What does the team composition have to do with that?

An Alam, Razzaq, or Kaneria would not have prevented defeat last week for Pakistan.

I don't see a reason why Pakistan should tinker with its line up; the only change I would like to see is Fawad Alam or Faisal Iqbal in place of Shoaib Malik.

I am not a fan of make-shift openers; particularly in test matches, hence I see no reason to separate Salman Butt and Khurram Manzoor.

Sri Lanka is likely to go in with the same team, unless they want to bring in an additional pacer, which I highly doubt.

Here are a few things that I am looking forward to seeing:

King Sanga and Younis Khan, after their double failure last week; big innings from the captains.

Ajantha Mendis with a point to prove or three; a few more wickets than he has managed thus far against Pakistan.

Umar Gul after a lacklustre perfomance; a breathtaking opening spell.

Another Mohammad Yousuf century; don't count it out.

Rangana Herath being smashed around; how I would love that!

More magic from Mohammad Aamer; this boy has it in him.

Another failure from Mahela Jayawardene; it'll take some time for him to get back to his best. Or will he ever?

Dilshan with a fiery cameo before getting out playing a scoop; don't think he will stop doing it.

Misbah finding yet another way to lose his wicket; you can surely count on that!

And a Pakistan victory; it has to be 1-1.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Ashes Day 4: Two-Bits & Hearsay

I sense an innings win for Australia on the 5th day.

Marcus North and Brad Haddin just shut England up today and further proved what I had to say about the English bowlers.

I can't believe how over rated they were before the Ashes began.

My two-bits from day 4:

  1. Marcus North and Brad Haddin managed centuries on their Ashes debuts; I'm not sure who all have managed that - I know Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist, and Mark Waugh have; I know Allan Border and Steve Waugh haven't. I'm sure there are many more cricketers with the same achievement, but its quite an effort from these two.

  2. Stuart Broad just keeps getting worse - please someone tell me why he's playing international cricket?

  3. North and Haddin put on an even 200 for the 6th wicket; I thought that must have been one of the highest for the Ashes but it was far behind the 1937 effort (346) between Bradman and Fingleton.

And some hearsay.


Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Saturday, July 11, 2009

Random Pakistan Cricket Fact #15

Kamran Akmal has more dismissals in test matches than Rashid Latif and Moin Khan.

For an average wicketkeeper, I found that quite amusing.

How has Akmal managed to surpass Rashid and Moin?

His dismissals per innings (2.05) are also higher than Moin's (1.24) and Rashid (1.88).

In fact, Kamran Akmal has more dismissal per innings than any Pakistani wicketkeeper in tests!

Figure that one out.

Imagine where that figure would be if he didn't drop all those catches, or miss all those stumpings.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Ashes Day 3: Two-Bits & No Hearsay

The first test of the Ashes, and the first of the three tests I predicted to lose overs due to rain; good start I say to the Ashes Prediction Competition!

It was rain that made them go off, not the bad light, right?

Though I think I'm going to suffer on the Mike Hussey front and the first test result blunder.

Anyhow, here are my two-bits for the day 3:

  1. This is the second time that Michael Clarke has missed a century in the opening Ashes test in England after his 91 at Lord's in 2005. He still doesn't have a test hundred in England.

  2. Stuart Broad started this test match with an average of 38, an economy rate of 3.2, and a strike rate of 71. Pathetic that is. He hasn't done himself any good in this game. Why England persists with him is beyond me.

  3. For those who thought that England picked their wicketkeeper forgetting about the catching and stumping - Prior has been behind 3 of the 5 dismissals.

  4. Out of the current Australian batting line up, Ricky Ponting (127, Leeds 1997), Michael Clarke (91, Lord's 2005), and Michael Hussey (86, Brisbane 2006) scored 50 or more in their Ashes debut; today Marcus North joined that list. He could very well join Ponting too.

  5. Graeme Swann wicketless? So much for the English hopes.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Friday, July 10, 2009

3 in 3 for Umar Akmal!

Umar Akmal continued his fine form in Australia with yet another century; his 3rd of the tour after his back to back effort in the 2 test matches against Australia A.

In the 1st ODI between Pakistan A and Australia A, Umar Akmal smashed 104 runs off only 70 deliveries, which included 5 sixes and 10 fours.

3 centuries in 3 matches on tour in Australia - haven't seen this before!

The best part is that Umar was not up against some average second grade bowling; he faced internationals Shaun Tait, Doug Bollinger, Brett Geeves, and Jason Krejza.

This tour is not yet finished and if Umar can continue his awesome run with the bat, it won't be long before the selectors will be seriously considering him for the senior side.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Ashes Day 2: Two-Bits & Hearsay

After Day 1, I was of the opinion that England were ahead; today Ricky Ponting and Simon Katich have ensured that Australia are definitely ahead.

A result is still possible I believe. Don't rule out an Australian lead and an English collapse; its happened way too often in the past.

Particularly in the first tests of an Ashes series.

Speaking of first Ashes series tests, here are my two-bits from Day 2:

  1. Ricky Ponting set the record straight in more than one way with his century; besides erasing memories of a bloody 1st test in 2005, Ponting kicked off an Ashes series in England with a hundred. He had done the same in Australia in the two Ashes series held there in this decade, but not in the two Ashes series held in England during the same period.

  2. Simon Katich managed his 1st Ashes century; strangely he has played all his Ashes tests in England. His previous best was 67.

  3. Ponting became the 4th batsman to cross 11,000 test runs; he did so in 9 more innings than Brian Lara, and in 1 less innings than Sachin Tendulkar.

  4. Before the series began, I called England's bowling shit. Anderson and Broad with test averages of 34 and 38 respectively did not exactly catch my fancy; all they did today was prove me right. Economy rates of over 4 and no wicket to show - they need to lift their game!

And some hearsay.


Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


The Ashes Prediction Competition

For once it is not Sportsfreak running a tipping competition.

This time its a couple of South Africans, who for some reason are interested in the Ashes. I presume to witness Australia's demise.

After all their coach, Mickey, gave the English some tips. So did Buchanan, but so what right? Australia are not losing the Ashes!

That's my tip anyway.

The competition is being run by The Commentary Position, a South African blog operated by Darren and Roscoe.

Their tips, or predictions like they call it, are here.

So far its them, Jrod, Damith, Brian Carpenter, and I who are competing.

Yep, Damith and I are up against each other again after our all famous Pakistan-Sri Lanka debate over at BCC!

Here are Damith's picks for the Ashes.

And here are mine.


THE FORMALITIES


Most Runs Overall (15) --> Michael Hussey, yeah I think he's back to his robotic ways. Everyone will pick Phil Hughes I'm sure.
Most Runs England (10) --> Ravi Bopara, any doubts?
Most Runs Australia (10) --> Phil Hughes, I'm hedging!
Most Wickets Overall (15) --> Mitchell Johnson, he will kill them English.
Most Wickets England (10) --> Graeme Swann, the pacers are useless.
Most Wickets Australia (10) --> Mitchell Johnson, don't need a hedge here.
Best Tosser (captain who wins the most tosses) (5) --> Andrew Strauss, he has to win something!
Man of the Series (10) --> Mitchell Johnson & Andrew Strauss, in England there are always 2 men of the series.
1st Test Result (10) --> England
2nd Test Result (10) --> Australia
3rd Test Result (10) --> Australia
4th Test Result (10) --> Australia
5th Test Result (10) --> Australia
Overall series result (15) --> Australia 4-1.


THE TRIVIALITIES


Number of Tests that lose overs to rain (note, not bad light) (5) ---> 3
Number of Tests that Flintoff will be able to manage (5) ---> 2
Number of Tests won by an innings (5) ---> 2
Number of Tests played by McDonald (5) ---> zero
Number of Tests played by Lee (5) ---> zero

If you're interested in taking part, you can still do it; however you will start from -1. Still worth it I believe.

Hop on over to The Commentary Position and give them your entry.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Thursday, July 9, 2009

Even God is on Chris Gayle's Side

The Ashes have allowed the drama unfolding in the West Indies to be pushed into the background.

If there was ever a dramatic cricket story; this is it!

Potentially the West Indies could field 9 debutants in their test match against Bangladesh, which should have started an hour ago but still hasn't due to rain.

The actual West Indies team is boycotting the series because of contractual disputes with the WICB.

Its strange that the dispute has gone to the extent that has led the board to field a second string team for a test match.

Sure its Bangladesh, but its still a test match.

Doesn't the board think that Chris Gayle, Chanderpaul, Sarwan, Jerome Taylor, Fidel Edwards, Dwayne Bravo are worthy of the contracts they are asking for?

Hasn't WICB thought of the repurcussions of losing a test match to Bangladesh?

It's more than likely.

So far the rain Gods have sided with Gayle and made sure a new look West Indies does not take the field.

But it's just about time before it happens; I don't think I have seen something more absurd than this!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,


Random Pakistan Cricket Fact #14

Imran Khan to Inzamam: "I know that you will win us the World Cup."

True story.

Pakistan had played about a dozen warm up matches in Australia before the 1992 world cup; Inzamam Ul Haq had failed in all of them.

When members of the team and the management suggested that he was not good enough, Imran Khan maintained that, "this boy will win us the world cup."

After Pakistan's last league game against New Zealand, which was another failure for Inzamam, Imran Khan went up to Inzamam and said, "You scored only 5 but you hit 1 boundary and that was an amazing stroke. I know that you will win us the World Cup."

The rest, as we all know, is history.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Ashes Day 1: Two-Bits & Hearsay

The Ashes build up in the media was overwhelming to say the least; but that was nothing compared to the over drive they went into today.

I woke up to over a 100 new entries in my RSS Reader. That has never happened before and I have over a 100 blogs and sites that I subscribe to!

It goes without saying that almost all of those new entries was something or the other about the Ashes, which kicked off today.

Anyhow, so here are my two bits about day 1 of the Ashes.

  1. Australia have as many as 7 Ashes debutants in their line up. Only Ponting, Katich, Hussey, and Clarke had played an Ashes test before today; meaning that Australia's entire bowling attack is playing their first test against England.

  2. On the other hand, England have only 4 Ashes debutants - Bopara, Prior, Broad, and Swann.

  3. Nathan Hauritz 1st Ashes wicket was Kevin Pietersen; not bad was it.
Now for some hearsay from Day 1.


Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


The best thing about Mohammad Aamer

We all knew the boy had pace.

We all knew he could swing the red ball both ways.

We all knew he was touted to be Pakistan's next pace sensation.

We all knew he was one for the long term for Pakistan.

We all knew he would get wickets in heaps.

All that, Mohammad Aamer showed during his debut in the first test against Sri Lanka, with a match haul of 6-112.

The best part about that though, was that all his 6 wickets were top order batsmen.

Aamer got the best of them, 3 in each innings, 1 bowled, and 5 caught by the keeper or in the slips.

Just goes to show how well the left armer bowled.

King Sanga twice, Jayawardene, Dilshan, Paranavitana, and Warnapura - that's 5 of Sri Lanka's top 6 that Aamer managed to topple over in his debut test.

He has a lot of promise and a long road ahead of him; hopefully a bright one.

And hopefully he follows in the foot steps of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis and not Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 7, 2009

You Really Think England Can Win?

To say there has been plenty of hype about the Ashes would be the biggest understatement ever.

All the Australian and English blogs have been buzzing with Ashes hype; that is not the surprising bit.

What is surprising is that many believe that England have a real chance at winning the Ashes.

They can't be serious!

I have no idea how anyone can seriously believe that England can win.

Sure they have great batsmen; Andrew Strauss converts 50s to 100s at a better rate than anyone; Kevin Pietersen scores centuries more often than anyone else; Ravi Bopara has knocked centuries in his 3 previous tests.

But their bowling is shit.

I don't even know why Stuart Broad plays international cricket.

James Anderson and Graham Onions hardly look the sort that can run through the Australians.

It is not the West Indies batsmen they're up against. It is the Hughes, the Katich, the Ponting, the Hussey, the Clarke, the North, the Haddin, the Johnson.

That is one heavy batting line up.

Andrew Flintoff is probably the only threat to them but it won't be long before he'll be limping off the field or getting dropped for missing a boat or something.

Graeme Swann is a more than decent spinner, but he's no threat. Definitely not. He was for the West Indians, not one for the Aussies.

Monty Panesar is a joke.

Adil Rashid is probably their best hope but they won't give him a single game.

The Australians recently beat South Africa at home; a team who had not lost a test series in almost forever.

While the English could not bowl out the West Indies to win a game in the Caribbean; sure they beat them at home but the West Indians were hardly interested in being there.

I just cannot see England winning any game in the Ashes; nor can I see how anyone else can.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Why was Rangana Herath Man of the Match?

I watched the last Pakistani wicket fall this morning, but I didn't bother to stay up any longer to watch the presentation.

I switched the TV off and went to bed.

Once I woke up, I didn't bother to check the scorecard; I usually do to check who the man of the match was, what the figures were and so on; this time I didn't.

Till now that is.

After reading the comments regarding Rangana Herath on Krishna's post about Pakistan's loss, I went over to Cricinfo's scorecard to check his best ever figures out.

4-15 looks good but why in the world was that a man of the match performance?

Don't ask me who else it should have been, tell me why Herath got the man of the match award?

Sure he bowled a match changing second over of the day this morning, but his 4-15 really included only 1 big wicket.

That of Mohammad Yousuf; the delivery he bowled to have Yousuf play all around it was a very good one.

Besides that, Herath hardly did anything else.

Salman Butt threw his wicket away needlessly, while Abdur Rauf and Mohammad Aamer can hardly count as match winning wickets.

Then why Rangana Herath?

Why not Tharanga Paranavitna who put together a rearguard action when the other batsmen struggled; or Nuwan Kulasekara who managed to keep Pakistan's lead to only 50 runs; or Thilan Tushara who truly bowled an unplayable spell?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Awesome Advertisement for Test Cricket

That's what the first test between Pakistan and Sri Lanka was.

Who said Pakistan and Sri Lanka play boring dull draws?

They did so in Pakistan earlier this year but then that's how pitches have been off late in Pakistan.

If history is anything to go by, a Pakistan vs Sri Lanka test match produces a result more often than not - out of the 35 tests they have played against each other, only 12 have ended in draws.

Coming back to this test at Galle; it had everything one could have asked for from a test match.

Outstanding pace bowling with plenty of swing; canny spin bowling with batsmen trying hard to read and counter; brilliant rearguard actions with the bat; a dogged century from one of the best batsmen in the world; mini collapses and a major one on the 4th day; partnerships and broken ones; balls beating the bat; bats dominating a few sessions; pretty much even stakes for both sides throughout the game; and a result on the 4th morning.

All that came from both Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

And then we hear people say test cricket is not exciting!

There wasn't a single moment during this test match when I was bored. It was fast paced action throughout the four days.

Now I hope Sri Lanka are brave enough to have similar pitches for the two remaining test matches and don't produce flat tracks to enforce dull draws and a series win.

Ideally this series should go into the 3rd test at 1-1; then we would truly have an awesome advertisement for test cricket!

You tell me; would you rather watch fast paced cricket action over 3 hours in a T20 game, or the same for hours everyday for 5 days?

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Pakistan is Pakistan after all ...

Last night everyone went to bed thinking that Pakistan will win their first test match in two and a half years.

I didn't.

Go to bed that is.

I stayed up all night in anticipation of a Pakistan win.

97 to get, 8 wickets in hand, Yousuf and Butt at the crease; who would have thought that the Pakistani batsmen had other things on their minds.

Sri Lanka have all but closed this test and I guess its time to go to bed.

I know Stani and many others will be looking to slit my throat for pointing out that Sri Lanka had not won a test against Pakistan at home since 1986.

But a fact is a fact. It was true.

So the win, which was supposed to be a first for Pakistan in two and a half years, will now in all probability be a first for Sri Lanka in 23 years!

A bit historic for them I guess.

Sri Lanka never looked like winning this game; Pakistan was on top from the moment Younis Khan called right at the toss.

All the way till this morning.

Tushara and Herath bowled brilliantly and the Pakistani batsmen had no answer for the swing and spin.

But there is no excuse for Pakistan's slide from 71-2 to 86-7.

They blew it!

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Random Pakistan Cricket Fact #13

3 Pakistanis have taken 4 hatricks in test matches; all have come against Sri Lanka.

Wasim Akram did so twice in consecutive test matches during the Asian Test Championship in 1999.

The first one of those I witnessed at the Gaddafi. The second one I watched live in my college dorms.

Abdul Razzaq and Mohammad Sami are the other two.

There's definitely something about Sri Lanka that Pakistan fancies; I'm not sure exactly what.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , ,


Monday, July 6, 2009

Sohail Tanvir does it for Shane Warne

There must be something about Shane Warne that Sohail Tanvir always brings out the best for him.

He did it during the 2008 IPL campaign, ending the competition as the league's leading wicket taker.

And he did it again for the Rajasthan Royals in today's T20 match against Middlesex Panthers.

The 2008 IPL and County T20 champions met today at Lord's in a game played for the British Asian Trust, one of the Prince of Wales' charities.

Batting first, the Royals posted a winning total of 162 that included an Asnodkar and Kaif consolidation play and a late burst from Mascarenhas.

Even Justin Langer turned out for Warne's team but he couldn't get going with the bat.

In response the Panthers were bowled out for only 116 with Tanvir picking up 3-20 in his 4 overs.

He got the crucial wickets of opener Godleman, Eoin Morgan, and Tyron Henderson, who had appeared for the Royals in this year's IPL.

Tanvir's lack of form for Pakistan did not hurt their chances in the World T20, but it would have been good to see him performing for his country.

Like he does for his IPL franchise.

So what is it about Warne that brings about the best in Tanvir?

Maybe Younis Khan needs to take some tips on what makes Tanvir tick.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


A More Than Happening Test Match

A first time captain, 4 debutants, first over wickets, wagging tails, century from an ICL rebel, wicketless Mendis, Younis Khan picking up wickets, opener nightwatchman, first ball wicket for Mendis; and a whole lot more.

On top, we will have a result on the 4th morning of the test.

To say that the first test between Pakistan and Sri Lanka has been happening will be a gross understatement.

A lot has happened during the three days of this test, but 3 things have stood out for me.

  1. A nightwatchman walking out as opener.

  2. A debutant getting the wicket of the opposing captain in both innings.

  3. Debutants picking up 16 out of the 32 wickets that have fallen thus far.
I don't know if either of these have happened before in a test match; I wouldn't be surprised if these are first time instances.

If someone has the facts, please enlighten me.

I'm going to go and do some digging myself.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , ,