Showing posts with label Pakistan vs New Zealand 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pakistan vs New Zealand 2016. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Can Pakistan overcome Australia?

Pakistan has just kicked off its 12th tour to Australia, where they have never won a Test series. It has been 52 years since Pakistan first toured Australia, and in all this time they have managed to win only 4 tests out of the 32 played down under.

7 of the tests were drawn, while Australia have won a whopping 21!

The last three tours to Australia resulted in Pakistan being clean swept 3-0 on each tour.

Pakistan have faced 9 successive defeats in Australia.

The last time Pakistan won a test in Australia was 21 years ago. 

One has to jog back another 15 years to find another win for Pakistan over Australia.

Such a history, coupled with Pakistan coming off three successive test losses including a first ever test series loss to New Zealand in three decades, indicates that this tour to Australia will be a huge disaster for Misbah's men.

Australia are firm favorites. All the odds are against Pakistan for this series. Any odds you see, like the ones on https://www.aceodds.com/promo-codes/bet365-bonus-code.html will show that Australia are the side to bank on.

But then, this is the same Pakistan that remained unbeaten in 7 test series over two years.

This is the same team that reached the pinnacle of the test rankings.

This is the same team that held a strong England side to a draw during the English summer.

This is the same team that has beaten Australia in the last three tests played between the two sides.

This is the same team, that under Misbah, believes in achieving the impossible.

The New Zealand disaster was due to a number of reasons. An unprepared team, no practice, wet conditions, a stand-in captain, and an unsettled batting combination, which did not have any time to familiarize itself with the conditions. All this added to the despicable performance.

Australia, however, is different.

Conditions for batting are better. Micky Arthur is more familiar with the conditions and the opposition. Australia's batting is arguably at its worst in three decades. Misbah is back at the helm and will be rallying his troops after three consecutive test losses.

Even though Pakistan has never won a series in Australia, this tour presents Misbah and his men a real chance to change history.

Misbah has already become the most successful captain in Pakistan's test history; a series win in Australia might give him the coveted title of the greatest captain Pakistan ever had.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , ,


Monday, November 14, 2016

Pakistan's Test Dominance over New Zealand

Pakistan have lost just 8 tests to New Zealand, while they have won three times as many! Pakistan have lost fewer tests only to Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. Their W:L ratio of 3.0 against New Zealand is their second best W:L ratio.

Safe to say that Pakistan have been quite dominant over the Kiwis in Test cricket.

Even in New Zealand's seaming conditions, which are alien to Pakistan's batsmen, Pakistan has dominated with 10 wins to New Zealand's 5.

Some may say that given the history of dominance, Pakistan may treat these upcoming two tests against New Zealand as a warm-up to their tour of Australia.

That may be a grave mistake.

History might be on Pakistan's side, but Trent Boult, Tim Southee, and Matt Henry are on New Zealand's.

Those three have the capability of running through any batting line up.

Pakistan's batsmen have been in sterling form for a while now so they are no pushovers, but they will have to be at the top of their game in seaming conditions.

Its not like they will be playing pokies at the source where they can try their luck.

It will be interesting to watch what batting combination Pakistan goes in with. Given the conditions in New Zealand the 5 batsmen-WK-Allrounder strategy may not work and Pakistan will have to move back to their original successful formula of 6 batsmen + WK.

Additionally, with no requirement to play an additional spinner, Nawaz may not be required.

The next question is that will Azhar Ali continue to open?

If he does, it allows Pakistan to play a middle order comprising Asad, Younis, Misbah, and the super talented Babar Azam.

If Azhar moves back to his preferred number 3 then Sharjeel will be included in the XI and Babar will have to miss out. This will also move Asad back to number 6.

This is probably going to be the most important decision that Pakistan's think tank takes on this tour.

Nevertheless, the batting definitely has a more sorted look than the bowling.

Yasir Shah along with three seamers is what the bowling will probably feature. The question is which three seamers?

Mohammad Aamer, Wahab Riaz, and Sohail Khan seems likely. But Rahat Ali was a great asset in England so maybe he will be preferred to Sohail.

The thing to look forward to with the bowling is surely Aamer's swing in New Zealand's conditions. The English summer was quite dry and Aamer barely got any swing. New Zealand might be different and it might end up being the tour that Aamer needs to bounce back to his very best in Test cricket.

Pakistan vs New Zealand has provided plenty of exciting matches in the past and this promises to be yet another exciting Test series.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , ,


Can Sharjeel Khan make an impact in Tests?

Sharjeel Khan's inclusion in Pakistan's test squad for the two match series against New Zealand has met with mixed reactions.

Rightly so given the sort of batsman he is.

My initial thoughts on Sharjeel were that at best he is a T20 batsman. His initial international outing in 2013 also showed that he was best suited for T20s, however he was dropped from both limited overs formats after failing in ODIs.

Following the PSL last year, Sharjeel was drafted back into the T20 and ODI squads. In T20s he continued his striking form, while in ODIs he left plenty to be desired with a number of failures in between some sterling whirlwind knocks.

For me, he remains a great T20 batsman and an average ODI one.

So then why has he been selected for the test squad?

What were the selectors thinking?

Is he the best choice for opener / reserve opener in the test squad?

Sometimes it just feels like the selectors are making a play at a Casino and trying their luck at winning with a new opener.

With Sami Aslam cementing one of the openers slots, it was Azhar Ali's initial hesitancy to open in tests, which resulted in the selectors looking for a third opener for the tour.

Having given it some thought, Sharjeel may not be a bad choice despite his average performances in ODI cricket.

Many have likened Sharjeel's stroke play to that of Virender Sehwag and David Warner, both of whom played ODI cricket for a couple of years before breaking into the test squad. All three are quite similar in terms of how they approach batting.

A glance at Sehwag's and Warner's careers shows that they had / have far better performances in Tests than in ODIs. While Warner has closed the average gap in recent times (48 in tests; 41 in ODIs), Sehwag ended his career with a Test average of 49 and an ODI average of 35.

Even thought both batsmen have the aggressive nature to excel in ODIs and T20s, they were far more prolific in Tests than in the limited overs formats.

A look at their ODI performance before either made their test debut bears a lot of similarity with Sharjeel's performance.

In fact, Sharjeel has fared better than Warner and Sehwag did in their initial years of ODI cricket.

This also goes to show that both Warner and Sehwag improved as ODI players after making their test debut. 

Probably it was learning the art of staying at the wicket longer in Tests that made them better ODI batsmen.

Maybe, Sharjeel will go through the same learning curve if he does in fact make it to the Test XI in New Zealand.

Given that he is a batsmen made in the same mold as Warner and Sehwag, his inclusion in the Test team might end up being a master stroke by the selectors. He may end up being the perfect aggressor to complement Sami Aslam's gradual accumulation at the other end. He may provide that spark to Pakistan's Test team whose top 6 batsmen bat in the same mode.

If Sharjeel can have even half the impact that Warner and Sehwag had on their Test teams, it would be a job well done for Pakistan.

While I don't rate him much as an ODI batsman, I am actually looking forward to the prospect of having an attacking batsman at the top of the order in Tests.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, February 3, 2016

World T20 2016: Pakistan Selectors need to focus on Continuity

A 2-1 series loss to New Zealand and the preceding 3-0 loss to England resulted in Pakistan falling in the ICC T20 rankings from number 2 to number 7. With the World T20 just over a month away, Pakistan's preparation has been far from ideal. Till a few years ago, the popular perception was that the shorter the game, the better Pakistan is; however this cannot be further away from the truth. Since the turn of the decade, Pakistan has been a superior test team compared to an ODI and T20 team. The disparity between results is clear.


This disparity becomes even more glaring when you consider results among the top 8 teams; i.e. excluding matches against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe in the past 5 years.


Pakistan has maintained a strong performance in test matches over the past 5 years, winning more than they have lost; however in the limited overs formats, the green shirts have been found wanting. One apparent reason for this stark difference is the continuity factor.

While Misbah has been at the helm of the test team throughout this period, Pakistan has seen the ODI and T20 captaincy change hands several times. From Afridi to Misbah to Azhar in ODIs and from Afridi to Misbah to Hafeez and back to Afridi in T20Is. This is never settling for a team. Moreover, Pakistan’s test team has had a stable batting line up for a long time now, unlike the ODI and T20 teams that have witnessed a lot of chopping and changing.


The difference between the number of players tried by Pakistan at each batting position across formats is also quite evident. Sure one should be more flexible in limited overs games; however the number of different batsmen used by Pakistan in each position over the past 5 years also shows that not many batsmen were provided with an opportunity to settle down in any one position.

What is difficult to understand is why hasn't the same board, selection committee, and team management followed the same formula of success across formats? When continuity was key in ensuring positive results in tests, why was it not used for the limited overs formats?

With the World T20 round the corner, the biggest dilemma facing Pakistan is that of selection. By this time, majority of the squad should have been decided; but that does not seem to be the case. Especially when the captain himself gives comments like "time is running out for Ahmed Shehzad and Umar Akmal".

The most shocking part about that statement, which resonates the feelings of majority of the fans, is that Shehzad and Akmal are two of Pakistan's best batsmen in the shortest format of the game. Not only are both of them among the leading run scorers for Pakistan in T20Is over the past 5 years, they also have outstanding averages and strike rates. I am really not sure what more they need to do to prove their abilities, but both are definitely two key members of Pakistan's T20 team.


There is no reason why any of these 5 batsmen should not be on the plane to India in March.

While the above 5 batsmen have displayed consistent form, there have been a few batsmen that have been extremely disappointing. Sohaib Maqsood has always looked out of sorts in T20Is; and it was no different in the recent series against New Zealand and England. Mohammad Rizwan has also been a disappointment in T20s. Haris Sohail and Rafatullah Mohmand have also not displayed anything extraordinary in the few T20s that they have played for Pakistan to consider them.

A name that has been doing the rounds with respect to World T20 selection is Kamran Akmal. His recent domestic form has been remarkable and he was the leading run scorer in the recently completed domestic one-day competition. Kamran has always been a prolific scorer in the domestic circuit and I can understand the urge for the selectors to include him in their World T20 plans; however his T20I record over the past 5 years is mediocre at best.

I do not see any reason why any of these batsmen should be a part of Pakistan's World T20 squad.

While Sohaib and Rizwan seem to have got plenty of chances in recent times, I fail to understand what wrong Mukhtar Ahmed, Sherjeel Khan, and Nauman Anwar did for Pakistan to discard them after only a handful number of games.


Looking at those averages and strike rates absolutely bewilders me why neither of them have played more T20s for Pakistan. Forget about being selected in the playing eleven, these three have not even been a part of Pakistan's T20 squads for the recent series.

Another batsman that should be a no-brainer selection for the World T20 is Babar Azam. He is yet to make his T20I debut for Pakistan, however if his ODI innings are anything to go by then one can easily see why he is a must have in the T20 side. He has demonstrated immense character in his short career thus far, and his wide range of strokes shows his potential for the T20 format.

Then wicketkeeper position does not require much debate. Sarfraz Ahmed has done nothing wrong to be dropped and has easily been the pick of the wicketkeepers that Pakistan has tried in T20Is in the past 5 years.


Pakistan’s bowling squad for the World T20 squad, in my opinion, should comprise 4 pacers and 2 spinners. Mohammad Aamer, Wahab Riaz, and Imad Wasim pick themselves given their recent performances. Even though Aamer was not at his best in the T20 series against New Zealand, he showed improvement with every international outing. Wahab has been carrying the attack on his shoulders for some time now, while Imad has been a revelation in the limited overs formats.


The other 3 members could be anyone from Mohammad Irfan, Umar Gul, Anwar Ali, Sohail Tanvir, Zafar Gohar, Yasir Shah (if cleared), and Saeed Ajmal who recently announced that he is aiming to be a part of Pakistan’s World T20 plans.

Surely the Pakistan Super League will allow the selectors to judge all the players; however I believe that Pakistan should seek continuity rather than stop-gap solutions. It is about time that Pakistan adopts an effective selection strategy for the World T20, similar to what they have done for the test team. While the Pakistan Super League performances can help selectors finalize candidates for the two or three vacant positions, majority of the squad should be in their mind right now.

This is the 15 I would go with: Shahid Afridi (C), Mohammad Hafeez, Ahmed Shehzad, Umar Akmal, Babar Azam, Shoaib Malik, Mukhtar Ahmed, Sherjeel Khan, Sarfraz Ahmed (WK), Imad Wasim, Mohammad Aamer, Wahab Riaz, Umar Gul, Anwar Ali, Yasir Shah (if cleared) or Zafar Gohar.

Whoever the selectors decide on, they should ensure that they select the same 15 for the Asia Cup T20 and the World T20. Ensure continuity and provide the players to settle down as a team ahead of the T20 championship.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Sunday, January 17, 2016

How can you stop Salman Butt and Mohammad Asif from playing for Pakistan?

The bans are over and Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif, and Mohammad Aamer are back; the latter in international colors and the former two for their domestic team. Considering that they did not play any competitive cricket for 5 years and have now come out of the wilderness to get their first taste of cricket, it has been quite a remarkable comeback!

Let us take Aamer out of this equation given the support he was provided throughout his ban by the PCB, ICC, and current and former cricketers. Butt and Asif were condemned by all. They did not get the kind of sympathy Aamer did; not from the administrators, nor from the fans. The PCB did not provide them the same kind of support, nor did the board do them any favors by delaying the rehabilitation process till it was completely necessary.

So in a situation like this when one knows that the entire world is aware of the wrong they have done, how does one motivate themselves? Think about it. Butt and Asif went through jail terms. They served a ban for cheating their team, their sport, their country. They were not provided support by officials in the same manner that another player was. Everyone wrote and spoke about how it was the end of their careers. They were not allowed inside the academies nor did they have access to practice facilities. Butt was condemned by everyone for being the architect of the fix, while Asif had struck the final nail in his coffin full of offenses.

Everyone including me thought that their careers were over! We all knew that Aamer will be back, but none of us ever thought that Butt and Asif would be able to make a comeback. Age was not on their side. A 5-year layoff from any sort of profession is as good as an end of a career, let alone sport where mental strength and fitness play such a major role.

Ignoring what they did and only thinking purely about the mental strength and fitness required to compete at the highest level after a gap of 5 years, their comeback has been nothing short of remarkable. Butt’s 135 and 99* in his first two innings and Asif’s 2-22 and 0-29 are phenomenal achievements given how they spent their past five years.

There was always this remote possibility that they would perform at the domestic level, but now that they have (particularly Butt), what will the PCB do? They have allowed Aamer to come back and don the green; will they be as welcoming to Butt and Asif if both continue to perform in domestic games? It will be highly unfair if both are ignored despite building their cases considering that a fellow player who was accused and convicted for the same crime has been welcomed back.

In fact, the PCB has had to intervene and coerce a couple of players to accept Aamer’s presence in national colors. What will they do in Butt’s and Asif’s case?


I understand that everyone from the administrators to the players and fans believe that Butt and Asif are more guilty than Aamer was. Their respective jail terms also imply that. However, like Aamer, the other two also went through their terms and fulfilled all obligations that were required of them for the ban to be completed. Now that they have been allowed to compete domestically, how can anyone stop them from competing internationally? 

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,