Showing posts with label Marcus North. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marcus North. Show all posts
Sunday, July 12, 2009

Ashes Day 4: Two-Bits & Hearsay

I sense an innings win for Australia on the 5th day.

Marcus North and Brad Haddin just shut England up today and further proved what I had to say about the English bowlers.

I can't believe how over rated they were before the Ashes began.

My two-bits from day 4:

  1. Marcus North and Brad Haddin managed centuries on their Ashes debuts; I'm not sure who all have managed that - I know Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist, and Mark Waugh have; I know Allan Border and Steve Waugh haven't. I'm sure there are many more cricketers with the same achievement, but its quite an effort from these two.

  2. Stuart Broad just keeps getting worse - please someone tell me why he's playing international cricket?

  3. North and Haddin put on an even 200 for the 6th wicket; I thought that must have been one of the highest for the Ashes but it was far behind the 1937 effort (346) between Bradman and Fingleton.

And some hearsay.


Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Saturday, July 11, 2009

Ashes Day 3: Two-Bits & No Hearsay

The first test of the Ashes, and the first of the three tests I predicted to lose overs due to rain; good start I say to the Ashes Prediction Competition!

It was rain that made them go off, not the bad light, right?

Though I think I'm going to suffer on the Mike Hussey front and the first test result blunder.

Anyhow, here are my two-bits for the day 3:

  1. This is the second time that Michael Clarke has missed a century in the opening Ashes test in England after his 91 at Lord's in 2005. He still doesn't have a test hundred in England.

  2. Stuart Broad started this test match with an average of 38, an economy rate of 3.2, and a strike rate of 71. Pathetic that is. He hasn't done himself any good in this game. Why England persists with him is beyond me.

  3. For those who thought that England picked their wicketkeeper forgetting about the catching and stumping - Prior has been behind 3 of the 5 dismissals.

  4. Out of the current Australian batting line up, Ricky Ponting (127, Leeds 1997), Michael Clarke (91, Lord's 2005), and Michael Hussey (86, Brisbane 2006) scored 50 or more in their Ashes debut; today Marcus North joined that list. He could very well join Ponting too.

  5. Graeme Swann wicketless? So much for the English hopes.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Friday, May 8, 2009

An Interesting Pakistan vs Australia 20-20 Post-Match Presentation

The post-match presentation after the 20-20 between Pakistan and Australia at Dubai Sports City was one of the most interesting presentations I have witnessed.

It was very different from those that were held after the ODIs, particularly because of the interactions between some of the players.

Unlike the Gala Dinner, which was held a few days back, the Pakistan and Australia players mingled with each other. There were animated discussions, jokes were cracked, and it was all very amusing to watch.

Here a are a few pics from the presentation.
At first, Shahid Afridi seemed a bit disturbed by something he saw in the crowd.
Then Umar Gul adjusted his pyjamas while Salman Butt looked on with a strange expression.
The two wicket keepers, Brad Haddin and Kamran Akmal shared a word.Haddin probably wanted to know what Akmal's gesture on reaching his 50 meant.

Umar Gul looked surprised at why Marcus North was being so chummy with him.

But when he realised, they had a little discussion, exhanged some smiles, and then held hands.
Shahid Afridi and Brett Lee had a long and animated conversation, gesturing and waving their hands and laughing out aloud.

And when they realised that they had attracted the photographers' attention, Afridi and Lee were out with their best pose.
Brett Lee then moved away from Afridi and had a chat with Umar Gul, probably asking him some of those bowling secrets, and later suggesting how he might play him next time.

While the rest of them interacted, Andrew Symonds was found sitting down on the grass, bare feet again. He had Callum Ferguson for company.
After receiving his match winning performance trophy, Akmal walked towards Shane Watson and probably discussed their future with the Rajasthan Royals.

Aqib Javed stood alone all this time looking very very grumpy and unamused.
There was a lot more than this happening and I will have the whole series of Afridi & Lee and Gul & North up on facebook soon.
The Pakistan players and sponsors had some fun will posing with the trophy - those pics will be up next. Later at night.
As for what these players were exactly saying and thinking - figure it out for yourself.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, March 3, 2009

The Australia That Works Hard

I guess I was too early in calling "how times change". It took a couple of days for an Aussie debutant to get a ton; and for the Aussie debutant opener to become the top scorer among the 3 openers that made their debuts during the week.

I have not been this delighted at an Australian victory since they beat the West Indies in 1992 to ensure Pakistan a semi-final spot at the world cup.

On the 1st day of this test, I tried explaining my support for Australia, whom I have not supported during their 15 year reign of invincibility, by arguing the case of the underdog and talking of my dislike for South Africa.

After their victory, I have more reasons.

There is no arrogant 6 foot plus bully at the top of the order trying to intimidate and decimate a bowling attack. Instead there is a 5 and half feet determined, innocent looking kid trying to make a mark in international cricket.

There is no pigeon legged pacer irritating the crap out of me by sticking to one line and length and dismissing batsman after batsman. Instead there is a sturdy looking swing bowler who moves it both ways and bowls with a smile that was rarely visible on the pigeon.

There is no drunkard brawler who was more of a slogger than a test batsman and annoyed me by scoring runs so easily. Instead there is a correct batsman who works hard for his runs.

There is no wannabe rockstar who bowled beamers and smiled for the cameras and started the lawn mower after every wicket. Instead there is a young pacer who hops like a one legged kangaroo and looks better while batting than the former.

There is no spinner who turns it a mile, or one that had a larger than life image, or one that bowled with his tongue out that made me feel like pulling it out and chopping it off. Instead there is a medium pacer, who does not even have a permanent test spot.

There is no pigeon wannabe who bowls the same nagging length and looks more like an office clerk than a test cricketer. Instead there is real hard working test bowler who shows a lot of passion in his effort on the field.

There is no wicketkeeper who used to change the course of tests in the matter of a session and pretty much changed the role of the keeper in todays times. Instead there is someone trying to make his own presence felt, both in front and behind (no pun intended) the stumps.

Matthew Hayden, Glenn Mcgrath, Andrew Symonds, Brett Lee, Shane Warne, Stuart McGill, Stuart Clark, and Adam Gilchrist won many tests for Australia during their decade and a half of dominance.

They intimidated the opposition, completely dominated the matches, and made winning so easy that it made it impossible for me to support them.

Great cricketers they were no doubt, but for them it didn't seem like hard work.

For them it was more like winning was their job.

They rarely failed, which is why I wanted them to.

Phil Hughes, Ben Hilfenhaus, Marcus North, Mitchell Johnson, Andrew McDonald, Peter Siddle, and Brad Haddin are no where near the stature of the players they have replaced.

Not yet anyway.

Nor do they seem to be as naturally gifted as their predecessors.

Which is why supporting them is all the more easier.

While the former group seemed to win it all without breaking a sweat, the latter one worked hard for their win at the Wanderers.

Hughes, Hilfenhaus, and North were playing their 1st test. McDonald his 2nd. Siddle his 5th. Johnson and Haddin their 20th or thereabouts.

For the first time in probably 2 decades have I seen an Australian side this inexperienced, for whom winning was not as easy as it has been for Australia over the years.

More than that, these players are still trying to make a permanent place for themselves in the line up.

It felt good to see the Australians work so hard for their runs and wickets.

It felt good to see the Australians pushed and intimidated.

And it felt good to see them come out of that on top.

It always feels good to see new cricketers, trying to establish themselves at the international level, ending on the winning side against a top team.

Despite the ugly face of Ponting still lingering around the team, I like the look of the new Australia.

Somehow, I hope they remain the new Australia and not turn into the old invincible Australia.

Elsewhere, NC has said something similar.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , , , ,


Saturday, February 28, 2009

Its not the Pitch, its the Batsmen & the Fielders!

There has been a mammoth match-saving captain's knock of 313 by Younis Khan.

There has been a huge 460 odd run partnership for the 4th wicket where Jayawardene made the most of two dropped catches and scored 240 and Samaraweera knocked a stroke filled 231.

There has been an aggressive unbeaten 158 by Kamran Akmal.

There has been an attractive 142 by Andrew Strauss, also made after making the most from a dropped catch.

There has been a century on debut - 117 by Marcus North.

There has been a maiden test century - 104 by Ravi Bopara.

There have been three 90s - Cook and Collingwood played atrocious strokes on 94 and 96 respectively to be caught in the outfield, while Mitchell Johnson was left stranded on 96 as his tail-end partners failed to support him.

All this in a week of test cricket without even a single 5 wicket haul.

When you take a look at the bowlers on show - Umar Gul, Muralitharan, Ajantha Mendis, Jerome Taylor, Fidel Edwards, Dale Steyn, Makhaya Ntini, Morne Morkel - its hard to believe.

Is it really the pitches? Or has the bowling not been upto the mark? Or is it just that the batsmen have played out of their skins?

Marcus North played a solid test innings on debut. He was composed, ran well, and punished the bad balls. North was up to the task against the best pace attack in the world and showed the Aussies what they had been missing in India and during the summer at home.

Johnson, as Coverdale would tell you, is Australia's Andrew Flintoff. His knock was pure skill and aggression.

Strauss was coming off a 140 odd in his previous test and got a life early on in his innings, while Cook bided his time as Strauss attacked and was also given a 2nd chance by the West Indian fielders.

Collingwood has 3 centuries in his last 8 or 9 tests, and Bopara made the most after a 41 hour flight, a century in a side game, and a dropped chance.

Edwards bowled brilliantly in this game, his fielders just didn't support him. He had Strauss and Bopara very early in their innings. So you can't really blame the pitch for being flat.

Those who think Karachi was a bad advertisement for test cricket, need to think again. Younis Khan's innings, in my view, was a great advertisement for test cricket. It showed the world how to bat in a test match - 12 hours and 48 minutes at the crease is no joke, especially when you haven't played test cricket for 14 months.

Even if the test was played on a green top, I reckon Younis would have scored the same amount of runs. Courage and determination can take you to unprecedented levels.

Jayawardene made the most of two dropped chances, and I reckon a batsman of his class and temperament would have scored just as much on any sort of wicket if he was dropped on 43 and 124.

Samaraweera was in aggressive mood since he walked to the wicket. He made the most of a very inexperienced bowling attack - a total of 20 odd tests for the 3 pacers he was against that included a debutant and one with a single test to his name. On top a spinner who hasn't learnt much from his 50 tests.

Kamran Akmal would have played the same kind of innings and would have scored the same number of runs, even if he had walked out to bat with Pakistan at 50-5. Look up history for proof.

So then, is it really the pitches?

I believe the batsmen have played out of their skin.

North and Johnson scored where, besides Ponting, every batsmen on both sides has struggled to cope against the swing. Its swinging all over the place at the Wanderers.

The Karachi pitch has come in for quite some criticism from everywhere, and I'm not too sure why. Both the teams have criticized it, commentators have criticized it, bloggers have criticized it, and even Sambit Bal has criticized it.

With all due respect to all of the above, I beg to differ. Plus, Mr. Bal, I think you are way off in comparing Karachi to the farce at Antigua.

Younis Khan was the difference between an innings defeat and the eventual result. Plus, Pakistan on the final day showed the pitch wasn't really a paradise. Forget that, Murali was spinning it a mile and either way he doesn't really need a pitch, and Mendis had the batsmen in trouble everytime he bowled his leg spinner - only his line was way off for him to get a wicket.

So really, its the batsmen who have played outstandingly this week or taken the opportunity given to them by the opposing fielders.

Make your pitch on this post...



Labels: , , , , ,